I' ll have to try the carquest one , ya like I said there was no groove for the clip , it was just smooth on the 38009 line I bought. Thanks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I' ll have to try the carquest one , ya like I said there was no groove for the clip , it was just smooth on the 38009 line I bought. Thanks
Wow that color looks familiar!
![]()
Hey Coe! How did you like your new gearing in Moab?
What a beautiful cruiser too!)
, and quite frankly, I can handle it, but only because I love the sport and the rig so much. After about 4 hours, it's not much fun in between obstacles. I have decent shackle angles (Although I have read threads on here that say shackle angle has little to do with the ride- it's all about spring rate) and I think that my spring rates aren't that bad- although the longer rear shackles I made right before Moab may have stiffened the rears a little more. So, between wanting a certain look that I think a springover would give me, wanting a less harsh ride, and a little more articulation capability, I am tossing around the possibility of going spring over with 60 rears like Stumpalama in his ROTW thread: STUMPALAMA I know that I could run 35's on the what I've got now, but I think that those running low springovers and 35's have the rigs that appeal to my eye the most. I know there's all kinds of controversy about going SOA or not- and I certainly haven't decided FOR SURE yet- but it is something that I am researching and thinking about. Either way though, it's not going to happen until I do some rust remediation which will hopefully happen this summer- between weekends wheeling the living daylights out of it in it's current configuration.


and I want to be able to spend many years wheeling the Cruiser as a family with out spending a ton of time working on it. We'll see how much progress I make though, and I'm ok if it doesn't get totally done: I would just like to have a lot of it done.<snip>
On the vacuum, the FSM for a 2F states that 16.5 in. Hg at idle is what you're shooting for. But that will drop with altitude, I believe a lot of us in Denver see in the 13-14 in. Hg range. With a little higher elevation I'd say a steady 12 would be pretty good.
Coe, I was just flipping through the pocket manual last night and saw that the spec for high altitude vacuum readings was 12.6 in. Hg. I'm not sure what Toyota defines as high altitude, maybe >6,000 ft?
Coe, in this picture, is this an obstacle on Behind the Rocks?

.
I am a lucky man. I will get to bring 2 ladies to CM next year: My wife, and my by-then-4 month-old daughter!




My buddy and I went up that obstacle in his CJ7 on 31s during EJS 2005. I've heard it's gotten much more difficult since then, and it certainly looks like it has. I didn't know that was where Pappy rolled though![]()
Thanks Man!Congrats on the future new addition to the family!
11. Tack your perch on, double check that it is still 180* from the factory location, and then weld it up. Looks like so...![]()


It would look like this if we all had your welding skills Coe, sweet looking bead man!
![]()