"Best Value" LX 570? (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

I traded my '19 LX for a '14 LX and couldn't be happier. I went from a fairly well built 100 series LC to the newer LX after doing a lot of research and talking to some of the old hands here on Mud about the relative advantages and disadvantages of each. I love the AHC system which I mistakenly tore out of the '06 before having Slee do the build. The new one had WAY too much tech for an old luddite like me plus I don't tow so the bigger brakes and 8 spd tranny weren't necessary. If I want the bigger brakes I can add them for around $500. I will say that the seats in the new one were nicer but I wonder how they would hold up if you are camping, kid hauling, dog hauling etc. as they seemed more fragile if that makes sense. I bought my '14 about a year ago (TX, MT car) with around 47k miles for $42k if that helps your search. I looked for a few months on the usual places before I found exactly what I wanted.
Best of luck.
 
If I want the bigger brakes I can add them for around $500.
Really? Won’t rotors, calipers, and backing plates cost more than that?
 
I own a 2009 LX. So my answer if quite biased.

It’s the same frame and engine across all years.

Newer has more tech progressively, but the 2009 LX is roughly the same tech level as a 2015 tlc.

For me I’d rather have the simpler tech and not have to fight thru the OEM layers that make no sense in the modern day of CarPlay/AA.

I bought one of the cheapest 200s for sale at the time, it had 209k miles.

I assumed that I’d spend a bit baselining and fixing, but over 6 years it has actually been less than I thought it would.

Being older model / less cost base I don’t fuss about cosmetics outside, no worry about pinstripes etc.

Since it’s all the same underneath the sheet metal you can decide what matters most to you and just find that version.

For me no car loan, no cosmetic concerns, and as low tech as an Lx got was the sweet spot.
 
Really? Won’t rotors, calipers, and backing plates cost more than that?

Depends on which route you take but yes, very doable under $500.

Parts:
1) Brake calipers from second gen Tundra or Sequoia. I don't believe their brakes changed at all through even the current 2020 modes, though I haven't verified. Mine were used from a 2014 Tundra with 25k miles. These can be found dirt cheap from many sources. Re-manufactured, car part recyclers, car part retailers, Ebay, etc.
2) Brake rotor from a Tundra or Sequoia. As a previous track enthusiast, my personal preference is OEM. Anything else in the aftermarket is of questionable metallurgy or quality control. Except for the top tier brands which won't be a better value.
- OEM Brake Rotors left/right - 43512-0C020
3) Brake pad of your choice. Or re-use current pads if there's a lot of life left. Or aftermarket, which specified same pad for LC, LX, Tundra, Sequoia. I personally like upgraded street pads like Hawk HPS, Stoptech Street Performance, or TRD.
4) Hard brake line from caliper to suspension bracket
- passenger side: 473160C091
- driver side: 473170C031
5) Brake line from bracket to chassis
- Stoptech stainless brake line kit: 950.44023
- OEM: 90947-A2016
6) DIY line retension bracket (**more info in install below)
7) Brake fluid

8) Optional - Tundra brake shield though I found gentle massaging of the 200-series one to be perfectly viable.
Worthwhile to link to prior art on this install that details how to swap the brake shield which I didn't bother with. Takes this up to a 3-4 banana job.

I'm easily under $400 all said and done, which is dirt cheap for a legitimate brake upgrade. Barely more than a standard full up brake job.

Notes:
- I choose to simplify and streamline the install with minimal parts/effort by not changing the splash shield. As it is thin stamped steel, it's easily bent for the bit more clearance the larger rotor takes
- Tundra flexible line from suspension bracket to chassis is 1.6" longer, which can be expected as the Tundra suspension arms are about 1.5" wider. This works well here for either Tundra suspension swap, or stock, or extended down travel with OEM shock spacer
- The Tundra brake line setup is different (refer to below picture). The stock rubber brake line on the 200-series is a single piece, with a banjo fitting at the caliper, and retention bracket at the suspension upright. The Tundra setup requires a hardline at the caliper using a standard double flare connection. This is mated to the flexible brake line at the suspension bracket. A retention mechanism needs to be devised to secure the different line type. Potentially, there is a Tundra bracket that can be used, but this has not been identified

Tundra setup left, 200-series right
View attachment 2413683
 
One small benefit of the 2008-2011, though it is aesthetic - You can remove the lower LX door cladding to get a cleaner "LC-type" look. On 2008-2011 it is attached with double-sided tape; on 2013+, there are holes in the doors.

Before/after pics in the post below:

 
My #1 piece of advice would be to prioritize maintenance records over mileage/model year. These trucks will practically run forever if they are taken care of.
 
I'm cheap, so I got a 2010. If I had wanted to spend more money, I would have gotten an LC instead of an LX, not a newer LX. Just this guy's $.02
 
I'm cheap, so I got a 2010. If I had wanted to spend more money, I would have gotten an LC instead of an LX, not a newer LX. Just this guy's $.02
I am poor so I got the cheapest LC. 16+ lx/Lc are best looking

08-10 are ugliest. I am ugly as is my truck.

I am ok with that
 
@pcut are you a 200 convert? I think I'd like that 13-15 LX but I'm also very happy with my 100 series. A lot of what I read from people who have owned both makes it sound like a 200 series is always the better option. Looks wise I give it to the 100, but the 200 series LX I drove was really impressive.
 
One small benefit of the 2008-2011, though it is aesthetic - You can remove the lower LX door cladding to get a cleaner "LC-type" look. On 2008-2011 it is attached with double-sided tape; on 2013+, there are holes in the doors.

Before/after pics in the post below:

that would actually be a big benefit to me. the less chrome the better.
 
I am poor so I got the cheapest LC. 16+ lx/Lc are best looking

08-10 are ugliest. I am ugly as is my truck.

I am ok with that
I would rank them

16+ LC
08-11 LX
13-15 LC
13-15 LX
08-11 LC
16+ LX

But beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess!
 
I would rank them

16+ LC
08-11 LX
13-15 LC
13-15 LX
08-11 LC
16+ LX

But beauty is in the eye of the beholder I guess!
well lc > lx. That is a given, thus I dont mingle those two.

Lc
16 + best
08-11 second
13-15 worst

——

lx
16+ best
13-15 second
08-11 worst
 
This is a dilemma I'm currently putting myself through. O n Tuesday I'm sending a 2015 LX with 87k for PPI, and also looking at a 2013 LX with 140k miles and trying to get it scheduled for PPI as well. Pricing is same given mileage adjustment and I think these are a good sweet spot (at least for me). I have the money for a 16+ LX but, I know I'll feel less guilty hauling stuff, going to home depot, scuffing it up, going to the beach, etc. having spent less money, and to just use it. But I also really appreciate great headlights, updated safety tech (BSM for my wife), and more modern things in general, hence the strong pull to lean towards a 16+. Not a fan of the 16+ mouse, but as others have said, it isn't good, but doesn't kill the deal for them once adjusted to using. So, to conclude, I also can't decide, but this has been a really good thread, and ultimately there is no wrong choice. Everyone has their use case and comfortable cash limits. For me, I'm tired of being on the sidelines of the 200 community and will hopefully be joining soon.
 
This is a dilemma I'm currently putting myself through. O n Tuesday I'm sending a 2015 LX with 87k for PPI, and also looking at a 2013 LX with 140k miles and trying to get it scheduled for PPI as well. Pricing is same given mileage adjustment and I think these are a good sweet spot (at least for me). I have the money for a 16+ LX but, I know I'll feel less guilty hauling stuff, going to home depot, scuffing it up, going to the beach, etc. having spent less money, and to just use it. But I also really appreciate great headlights, updated safety tech (BSM for my wife), and more modern things in general, hence the strong pull to lean towards a 16+. Not a fan of the 16+ mouse, but as others have said, it isn't good, but doesn't kill the deal for them once adjusted to using. So, to conclude, I also can't decide, but this has been a really good thread, and ultimately there is no wrong choice. Everyone has their use case and comfortable cash limits. For me, I'm tired of being on the sidelines of the 200 community and will hopefully be joining soon.

A fellow Pensacolian! Can’t go wrong, but if headlights matter the early ones are awful
 
well lc > lx. That is a given, thus I dont mingle those two.

Lc
16 + best
08-11 second
13-15 worst

——

lx
16+ best
13-15 second
08-11 worst
Discrimination. You are excused from being wrong 🤭

The right order from top to bottom best to worst looking.. it's simple, really.

'13-15 LC
'13-15 LX
'16-21 LC
'16-21 LX
'08-11 LC
'08-11LX
 
This is a dilemma I'm currently putting myself through. O n Tuesday I'm sending a 2015 LX with 87k for PPI, and also looking at a 2013 LX with 140k miles and trying to get it scheduled for PPI as well. Pricing is same given mileage adjustment and I think these are a good sweet spot (at least for me). I have the money for a 16+ LX but, I know I'll feel less guilty hauling stuff, going to home depot, scuffing it up, going to the beach, etc. having spent less money, and to just use it. But I also really appreciate great headlights, updated safety tech (BSM for my wife), and more modern things in general, hence the strong pull to lean towards a 16+. Not a fan of the 16+ mouse, but as others have said, it isn't good, but doesn't kill the deal for them once adjusted to using. So, to conclude, I also can't decide, but this has been a really good thread, and ultimately there is no wrong choice. Everyone has their use case and comfortable cash limits. For me, I'm tired of being on the sidelines of the 200 community and will hopefully be joining soon.
For what it’s worth the 13-15 headlights can be very good when aimed correctly and using upgraded osram or Philips HID bulbs.

I hope one of those pans out for you though.
 
Discrimination. You are excused from being wrong 🤭

The right order from top to bottom best to worst looking.. it's simple, really.

'13-15 LC
'13-15 LX
'16-21 LC
'16-21 LX
'08-11 LC
'08-11LX
i will not take such abuse !!! 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬









however you are my brother - so all is ok 😜😎😎





agree 10000% 08-11lx is the worst and ugliest for sure
 
For what it’s worth the 13-15 headlights can be very good when aimed correctly and using upgraded osram or Philips HID bulbs.

I hope one of those pans out for you though.
Good to hear and will know soon enough.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom