Props to you on the seamless topic transition to a "What oil am I running?" thread!
![]()
*raises hand*
My bad!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Props to you on the seamless topic transition to a "What oil am I running?" thread!
![]()
0.100 of what?A gasoline combustion chamber wants a .100 flame kernel for a perfect burn.
A .1 flame kernel is very hard to create at even a low RPM.
The closer you can get to the .100 mark, the better your engine will run.
0.100 of what?
MV? Calorie/Second? Dyne? Therm?
I won't pretend to know what the perfect combustion scenario is, but I do have a Engine Development PhD for my V.P. of Engineering and an Engine Development Engineer for a supervisor whom I could ask.
My point is and was that if the spark is good enough to get the fuel mixture lit in any reasonably possible operating scenario then anything beyond that is money spent for not much gain. The lone exception would be if the money spent resulted in better reliability. The stock system with normal plugs seems to work pretty well. Were we talking massive boost or lots of NOx or some other method of increasing the A/F density in the combustion chamber, then more potent ignition systems are worth looking into.
How long do your plug wires, cap and rotor last with that kind of spark plug gap?
Was the night and day difference between a worn and tired ignition system and the new set-up, or between a well running ignition system and the new set-up?
I wonder what you're doing differently from everyone else who has gone down this path? In all of the trials that I've seen it worked for a while, but nowhere near 100k miles.