3-link front on FJ80

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Happy Bday Shawn sweet work. Are the springs being retained with anything at this point?
 
P I M P . Inspiring as well.
 
actionjackson said:
It feels good on the road. Definately better than it was with my stock radius arms. NO death wobble thank goodness. Just got back from a snow bashin trip and it performed very well.

And I'm sure you took pic's right......right???

-Ammo
 
tclndcrz said:
why dont you guys use chains? they rock man
The issue most people have with chains is they remove sheet metal when you flex unless you have plenty of clearance.
 
Shawn,
While at the SEMA Off Road show here in Indy I saw a Jeep setup with the 3rd and 4th links attached to the the 1st and 2nd links. (As opposed to your 3rd link to the frame.)
Was that a consideration while you were in the design stage? Just curious.
 
jklubens said:
Shawn,
While at the SEMA Off Road show here in Indy I saw a Jeep setup with the 3rd and 4th links attached to the the 1st and 2nd links. (As opposed to your 3rd link to the frame.)
Was that a consideration while you were in the design stage? Just curious.


That would get you right back to where you started, radius arm setup;)

All that work for nothing
 
That truck has one mean setup. Nice work man!
 
bustanutley said:
That would get you right back to where you started, radius arm setup;)

All that work for nothing

thanks, I'm just starting to understand and research hardcore setups.
 
Shawn .. congrats .. I thought is a very impresive job on your Cruiser ..

So did you have measurement of your caster with this 3 link setup .. ? are you uper link engought to handle all torque from your drivetrain to your axle . ?
 
bustanutley said:
That would get you right back to where you started, radius arm setup;)

All that work for nothing


not quite if you run just one upper...

i've worked on and wheeled a jeep setup that way, works very well.
 
But isn't running with only one upper link on one side like CruisinGA said, the same like this?

76my.jpg


This way i can get a good articulation in the front axle, but under hard breaking, the body on the side with the bolt removed "dives" a lot....
Are there any disadvantages on driving (only offroad) with the stock radius arms with one bolt removed?
 
But isn't running with only one upper link on one side like CruisinGA said, the same like this?

76my.jpg


This way i can get a good articulation in the front axle, but under hard breaking, the body on the side with the bolt removed "dives" a lot....
Are there any disadvantages on driving (only offroad) with the stock radius arms with one bolt removed?


other than the stock mounts bending.. guessing if your using CC bushings as most are with this set up you will still have bushing deflection. Its a poor mans 3 link. it will never be what has been built in this thread. There is alot more geometry to it as well than just having 3 connecting points.
 
Poor mans works pretty good, but it isn't balanced side to side. I plan to go 3-link here soon.

Back to my question though, does anyone know if he was using bumpstops?
 
Poor mans works pretty good, but it isn't balanced side to side. I plan to go 3-link here soon.

Back to my question though, does anyone know if he was using bumpstops?

Yes...Shawn uses bumps on that setup...just how much over stock, I'm not sure of...but if you look at some of the rear end pics you can see the bump extensions
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom