- Thread starter
- #21
Again, I agree with these sentiments, that's why just this weekend I put over 500 miles on the truck and we didn't even need its off road capabilities. We just like to drive this twenty year truck way more than the other two cars we got.
And I find myself peeking out the window multiple times a day just to look at my LX and admire her
One of these days it will decide to snow in WI like the good old days and I will just drive through piles of snow like a bad ass and I will be so happy that I will buy her some more upgrade jewelry!
Kind of like we had some flooding here last summer (about 30 inches of standing water on some streets) and I was able to drive through it and help rescue a couple of people.
And I find myself peeking out the window multiple times a day just to look at my LX and admire her

One of these days it will decide to snow in WI like the good old days and I will just drive through piles of snow like a bad ass and I will be so happy that I will buy her some more upgrade jewelry!
Kind of like we had some flooding here last summer (about 30 inches of standing water on some streets) and I was able to drive through it and help rescue a couple of people.
That stuff is part of off roading and owning a vehicle in general.
10k for a vehicle that is going to last you another 200k miles seems like a pretty good deal to me. Especially if it's paid for. @geanes summed it up perfectly.
Old cars take work, but not all old cars will continue to work this well and take the sort of abuse a land cruiser can take. There aren't many 20 year old vehicles that you can drive cross country, then do 200 miles of back roads, some hard trails, then drive back across the country.. with zero issues... at 200k miles, most other vehicles are just about to be scrapped, or they are on their second or third transmission or engine. A friend with a JK has 220k miles and literally is on his 3rd engine and 2nd transmission... who do you think paid more, him or you?