Update: 5W-30 & Heavier Recommended RoTW (5 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Personally PF farm is great entertainment, but terrible source of oil information and education. I liken it to how select companies have begun filling walmart shelves with the same oil with different branding; Gas truck, hybrid, extended drains, advanced fuel economy etc etc.
Agreed. 30k ft view at best for project farm “testing” results. Fun to watch, but not really getting at the heart of what makes each of the higher end oils special - if anything.

The motor oil geek guy on YT knows his stuff. It’s similar to watching the (legit) experts on
Bitog forum discuss oil merits, differences, drain intervals, and used oil analysis results for different brands and applications. Saves time for sure. There’s some GREAT oil options out there for our engines. We all have our bias from experience, etc.

As mentioned before, it seems like there’s a wide range of oil weights that will work for our engines in the US. I can’t say it has never happened, but as others have said it seems like oil related failures are very rare. That’s a great thing! Pennzoil UP is a good choice for a readily available oil that works really well. It’s what I tell my boomer neighbors to buy if they don’t want me to order amsoil or HPL for them.
 
Personally PF farm is great entertainment, but terrible source of oil information and education. I liken it to how select companies have begun filling walmart shelves with the same oil with different branding; Gas truck, hybrid, extended drains, advanced fuel economy etc etc.
I agree, I like the motor oil geek more and P UP does really well in the tests he does. Since it is not at a premium price vs Mobil 1 or Castro I think it is therefore a good choice.

Overall, as long as you put oil in there… and replace with not to long intervals it is probably fine for most of us.
 
Last edited:
I agree, I like the motor oil geek more and P UP does really well in the tests he does. Since it is not at a premium price vs Mobil 1 or Castro I think it is therefore a good choice.

Overall, as long as you put oil in there… and replace with not to long intervals it is probably fine for most of us.
dont forget the annual rebate, makes pup an even more compelling option.

I do have a soft spot for m1 0w40 though.
 
I also think the W30 or W40 vs W20 from Toyota is the difference we notice in noise or smoothness, not whether it is Costco or Mobil or Castrol or Pennzoil UP.
Its difficult to quantify smoothness unfortunately, as most are using their self calibrated butt dynos/vibration meter.

That being said subjectively, i do feel smoothness at the beginning of an oci, or when switching oil brands.
 
I will say in my 15' LX, when I've gone 10,000 miles on an oil change interval, there were virtually no detergents left. As in less wear protection. I send mine off to Blackstone Labs every oil change as I bought it with 89,000 miles. I've tried 5k, 7,500 and 10k intervals. From a an objective scenario it seems 7,500 would be my upper limit. 5,000 shows very little breakdown and has some room to run. That is running 0W-20 Mobil1 synthetic.
Just some food for thought.
I have no doubts about what you are seeing also. But that comes down to mass produced oil blends. More on that lower in this post.

Can you elaborate more on choosing a lower hths oil?
In my opinion, viscosity rating and cold weather pour point are very simple ways of trying to kinda guide armatures to generally what they need. I would recommend looking at HTHS and MRV. HTHS is (and I’m going to use wrong term and crazy simplify this, so please no one bit my head off) how hot you can push an oil before it starts to breakdown. MRV is how easily an oil can push though little spaces when cold, under load. Like in an engine.

When I first read that post, I was thinking he meant NOACK 😂 HTHS didn’t register.

Yeah idk why you would want lower HTHS.
Because you want the oil to quickly cool parts, and sometimes, a higher HTHS will hinder that. Extreme example, 2,000+ hp drag production cars. They run 5 weight oil in their motors because, the oil is cold and now acts like a much thicker oil. So back to a 3UR, most of there engines are daily driver, short trip vehicles. If I wanted to reduce wear, I would run a “thinner” oil that would move faster around the ringer when cold, and heat up quicker. As the engine will turn off, and cool soon after start up.

HTHS is not viscosity though. It’s related but if I had two oils exactly the same except for HTHS, I’d always go for the one with higher HTHS.
Totally agree. If MRV is appropriate for the starting temp range, and I have a nothing special, normal production motor, like a 3UR, I’d take .1 HTHS more. But yeah, 100% agree with you.

Sorry for late responses, I’m in and out a lot. And I apologize that this post is all over the place. I’m trying to shove a ton of engine tear down experince into a fast to read post. I don’t want to ruffle any feathers also, so don’t take me too seriously. If you disagree, no worries, we can still be friends. But I worry it will be awhile for me to respond again.

So, I would recommend getting away from worrying about viscosity. I really would. Look more into VII (viscosity index improvers). In this very thread, I used to run Redline 0W-30. Not anymore. I have found from pushing some of these motors overseas that keeping the oil from breaking down when running long intervals, that cheap shelf, wide range oils like 0W-30 breaks down faster than I want. Because it is loaded with VIIs instead of just using higher quality base oil. Cost reasons.
Also, bulk oil that I see everyone recommend, if you take two bottles of exactly the same oil from the shelf, and send those off for analysis, you will find that they are not always the same. Just like anything, if you make (blend) something fast, to get costs down, you will get a wider “acceptable” range.

Instead of making a long, drawn post even longer. Check out High Performance Lubrication (advlubrication.com), and while mostly overkill, their No VII, in 5w-20 will give more “protection” than anything anyone on here is using and handle high heat and heavy towing better than anything you are getting at Walmart or Amazon. Bold statement, I know. If you will be starting your motor in freeing temps, run their Premium Passenger Plus 0w-20. If you want to run a 30 weight, go for it. Mind you, the weak link in a 3UR is not the low tension piston rings, cylinder walls, or valve train. It’s the timing chain tensioners. Toyota got to four different versions of the chain tensioner design before they stopped making that motor. So is the tensioner design finally fixed or did they just stop there? Because when you get to four redesigns, I know think that maybe you needed five or six designs. Or… the chain is just way too long and tensioner #1 just will have a shorter life span.

Anyway, I’m not saying a 0W-30 is necessarily bad. Just that they usually need a lot of VIIs to get that, and those breakdown faster, and you will probably find varnish in your motor. If you are towing heavy up mountains, and camping overnight in freezing temps, well, 0W-30 sounds about right. But I don’t think I would use a 0w-30 when summer came around if I had the choice, especially if I was using sub $40 for five quotes bulk oil and running 5,000 mile oil change intervals.

I probably should have hit on “oil film thickness,” but really, that’s not a thing that will present itself unless you lost your radiator and still wanted to PUSH IT TO VALVE FLOAT!!

So yeah, all in all, if you are going to run 5,000 miles OCI, oh run whatever you want with a good filter. 3UR is going to a half million miles as long as you replace chain tensioners somewhere in there (which will also get your cam towers and timing cover resealed in the process). Want to run in 110+ºF while pulling a trailer, off road, in low range, while drunk, doing donuts, screaming Toyoda! Maybe HPL oil made of much more expensive base oils and additives that are blended to such are tighter tolerance time after time, with no VIIs to break down, and if you secretly want a diesel, then run a higher HTHS.
 
Regarding the tensioner the general conclusion is that 5W30 or 0W30 or heavier provides more oil pressure and helps the tensioner actuator. Obviously if the oil flow path is very tiny it will have lost pressure by the time it gets to the actuator and nobody on this forum (ideally an ex Toyota 3UR-FE designer) can provide this insight.

My personal assessment is that the 3UR-FE was designed for 5W30 or W30 or in hot climates like Middle East for W40 or heavier and that as result of pushing for 0W20 by the regulator is that those running that do not have long term enough force on the chain and get into problems and a rattle.

So I recently switched at 35k oil change to 5W30 and used OEM filter from dealer + a quality yet affordable prices oil like Pennzoil UP.

The thin 0W20 oil in very cold conditions will probably reduce cold start wear, so for the folks in Alaska at winter conditions of less than minus 20 or minus 30 degr F get in that place. I would say not for most of continental US except for maybe a few really cold days in winter.
 
Regarding the tensioner the general conclusion is that 5W30 or 0W30 or heavier provides more oil pressure and helps the tensioner actuator. Obviously if the oil flow path is very tiny it will have lost pressure by the time it gets to the actuator and nobody on this forum (ideally an ex Toyota 3UR-FE designer) can provide this insight.

My personal assessment is that the 3UR-FE was designed for 5W30 or W30 or in hot climates like Middle East for W40 or heavier and that as result of pushing for 0W20 by the regulator is that those running that do not have long term enough force on the chain and get into problems and a rattle.

So I recently switched at 35k oil change to 5W30 and used OEM filter from dealer + a quality yet affordable prices oil like Pennzoil UP.

The thin 0W20 oil in very cold conditions will probably reduce cold start wear, so for the folks in Alaska at winter conditions of less than minus 20 or minus 30 degr F get in that place. I would say not for most of continental US except for maybe a few really cold days in winter.
I don’t disagree with the general consensus, but I would like to offer a different perspective…

Said in a calm, carefree way, (I rewrote this part to be overlay simplified) let’s take viscosity differences between a 20 or 30 weight when at 212°F, it’s generally a 3% different. But if you look at the difference when at 90°, it’s around 20% different.

Now know that 5w-30 and 5w-20 are not at all the same at 70°F.

Now back to the tensioner. The way it holds oil, is not perfect, and it leaks down. Also, the chain is massive and tensioner #1 just had to deal with a lot of fast whipping chain.

So I feel that the start up, with the tensioners being slower to get to pressure with 30w is worse than the tensioners running already “pressurized” at, well any oil viscosity from 20-40 when at 212°F. Because the difference between a hot 20 and 30 is so small.

I’ve replaced so many tensioners in the 3URs that honestly, I don’t want to do them anymore. I just think it’s most of a “way too long of a chain” issue than an oil issue. So I’m not at all saying, ohhhh you all running 30 weight are messing up! Far from it.

Now onto oil overseas. I know from living most of my adult life in the Middle East that the desert gets cold, but not Wisconsin cold. And while Death Valley gets hot, most of the US has shade and I didnt find much shade in Iraq and Saudi. Not to say it’s not there, I remember walking in an area of Iraq, I thought I was in Vietnam (never been there). But remember that Toyota is recommending on the masses. So absolutely some people should run 30w. @TeCKis300 is one of those. Running a trailer, off roading, slow desert driving. Yeah, he’s not the norm. But lots of guys are treating their 200 like a civic. And that’s awesome. I wish I could daily a cruiser. But for those daily guys working 10 miles from home, I don’t know, I think I would recommend 20 weight. Even if it was Florida. Like a 5w-20.

Anyway, I’m not super passionate about this subject. And I think that it’s awesome that we are all trying to really take care of our trucks. Lord knows most people can’t even be bothered to even change their oil. I just wanted to offer that I think if anyone gets really into oil, to focus not on 20 or 30 weight. Get more into base oils, HTHS, MRV, filtration, analysis, and engine tear downs.

If someone can’t do those things, get some Costco oil and change every 3k-5k miles and use a Toyota filter. I bet your motor will motor will make it just as long as some yahoo like me that spends $17/qt on oil, with a primary and bypass filter, and changes oils based on the next country and load out that I’ll be running on that particular run. But… it is fun to think about all the ways to make it, better.
 
I don’t disagree with the general consensus, but I would like to offer a different perspective…

Said in a calm, carefree way, (I rewrote this part to be overlay simplified) let’s take viscosity differences between a 20 or 30 weight when at 212°F, it’s generally a 3% different. But if you look at the difference when at 90°, it’s around 20% different.

Now know that 5w-30 and 5w-20 are not at all the same at 70°F.

Now back to the tensioner. The way it holds oil, is not perfect, and it leaks down. Also, the chain is massive and tensioner #1 just had to deal with a lot of fast whipping chain.

So I feel that the start up, with the tensioners being slower to get to pressure with 30w is worse than the tensioners running already “pressurized” at, well any oil viscosity from 20-40 when at 212°F. Because the difference between a hot 20 and 30 is so small.
Out of interest I looked up some data on Pennzoil UP and Mobil 1 and my interpretation/logic what that does to the chain tensioner actuator.

Viscosity - For 0W20 and 5W30 the Kinematic Viscosity at operating temperature of 100C or 212F is 8.8 vs 10.3 centi Stokes (PUP) and 8.2 vs 11.1 (M1). That is a 17% to 35% difference, not 3%. Maybe for other brands it is different, would not think so but happy to be shown different.

Start Up - The rotary positive displacement oil pump with more viscous oil is more efficient due to less bypass with 5W30 vs 0W20. It also will stay better in place after shutting down the engine. Then we are back to the oil flow path to the actuator, which I do not have any detailed info on. I do not think it is that tiny that the actuator sees less pressure with more viscous oil. This obviously changes at very low temp conditions. In fact one must consider that the oil does not flow at the actuator, it just pushes against it static. There is no dynamic friction loss, maybe the first few seconds after startup. Therefore oil pressure created by the oil pump is the main factor.

Oil Pump Pressure - Is higher as witnessed by several on this forum going from 0W20 to 5W30. On the internal pressure gauge around 10%. After the oil starts flowing and in say > 0 degr F conditions it will result in higher oil pressure and therefore more force exerted by the tensioner actuator in the same ~10% amount. I doubt the transition period to these operating conditions is much different in time between 0W20 and 5W30 and that it is therefore useful to run the tensioner at effectively around 10% less actuating force using 0W20. Seems to me prolonged use with less tension is not good and increases wear and issues. That goes back to what the engine was designed for in the early 2000's. Based on factory delivery in the first years of 5W30 I therefore conclude the design was based on 10.3 to 11.1 centi Stokes oil which would then be the "sweet spot".

So why does the chain sound disappear upon warm up? One can argue that is the high initial viscosity condition (maybe part of your point Taco2Cruiser). I must say I do not have an immediate direct explanation why it would disappear. The engine and parts heat up and they slightly grow. The actuator housing may grow some and allows the actuator to move out easier with less friction. I do not know for sure or fully can reason this through, I am interested to see if others do know. However, I am more worried about not enough chain tension during hours of operation at temperature which then results in issues. I am also thinking this as BMW on the N57 replaced the chain tensioner for one with a stronger spring (is combined spring and oil pressure operated), so enough chain tensioner force can be an issue.

Happy to hear other aspects to this or disagreement. This is a public forum, shoot me down if you like. Prefer that is with data and engineering logic. Ideally we have a Toyota 3UR-FE engine designer participating. That would be real cool.

1724801352083.png


1724801382327.png


Kinematic Viscosity = the absolute viscosity of a liquid divided by its density at the same temperature = In fluid dynamics, it is sometimes more appropriate to work in terms of kinematic viscosity (sometimes also called the momentum diffusivity), defined as the ratio of the dynamic viscosity (μ) over the density of the fluid (ρ). It is usually denoted by the Greek letter nu (ν)

This is for Mobil 1 at 100C or 212F you have 0W20 at 8.2 cSt and 5W30 at 11.1 cSt or a 35% difference

1724802302353.png


1724802125689.png
 
Last edited:
I have no doubts about what you are seeing also. But that comes down to mass produced oil blends. More on that lower in this post.


In my opinion, viscosity rating and cold weather pour point are very simple ways of trying to kinda guide armatures to generally what they need. I would recommend looking at HTHS and MRV. HTHS is (and I’m going to use wrong term and crazy simplify this, so please no one bit my head off) how hot you can push an oil before it starts to breakdown. MRV is how easily an oil can push though little spaces when cold, under load. Like in an engine.


Because you want the oil to quickly cool parts, and sometimes, a higher HTHS will hinder that. Extreme example, 2,000+ hp drag production cars. They run 5 weight oil in their motors because, the oil is cold and now acts like a much thicker oil. So back to a 3UR, most of there engines are daily driver, short trip vehicles. If I wanted to reduce wear, I would run a “thinner” oil that would move faster around the ringer when cold, and heat up quicker. As the engine will turn off, and cool soon after start up.


Totally agree. If MRV is appropriate for the starting temp range, and I have a nothing special, normal production motor, like a 3UR, I’d take .1 HTHS more. But yeah, 100% agree with you.

Sorry for late responses, I’m in and out a lot. And I apologize that this post is all over the place. I’m trying to shove a ton of engine tear down experince into a fast to read post. I don’t want to ruffle any feathers also, so don’t take me too seriously. If you disagree, no worries, we can still be friends. But I worry it will be awhile for me to respond again.

So, I would recommend getting away from worrying about viscosity. I really would. Look more into VII (viscosity index improvers). In this very thread, I used to run Redline 0W-30. Not anymore. I have found from pushing some of these motors overseas that keeping the oil from breaking down when running long intervals, that cheap shelf, wide range oils like 0W-30 breaks down faster than I want. Because it is loaded with VIIs instead of just using higher quality base oil. Cost reasons.
Also, bulk oil that I see everyone recommend, if you take two bottles of exactly the same oil from the shelf, and send those off for analysis, you will find that they are not always the same. Just like anything, if you make (blend) something fast, to get costs down, you will get a wider “acceptable” range.

Instead of making a long, drawn post even longer. Check out High Performance Lubrication (advlubrication.com), and while mostly overkill, their No VII, in 5w-20 will give more “protection” than anything anyone on here is using and handle high heat and heavy towing better than anything you are getting at Walmart or Amazon. Bold statement, I know. If you will be starting your motor in freeing temps, run their Premium Passenger Plus 0w-20. If you want to run a 30 weight, go for it. Mind you, the weak link in a 3UR is not the low tension piston rings, cylinder walls, or valve train. It’s the timing chain tensioners. Toyota got to four different versions of the chain tensioner design before they stopped making that motor. So is the tensioner design finally fixed or did they just stop there? Because when you get to four redesigns, I know think that maybe you needed five or six designs. Or… the chain is just way too long and tensioner #1 just will have a shorter life span.

Anyway, I’m not saying a 0W-30 is necessarily bad. Just that they usually need a lot of VIIs to get that, and those breakdown faster, and you will probably find varnish in your motor. If you are towing heavy up mountains, and camping overnight in freezing temps, well, 0W-30 sounds about right. But I don’t think I would use a 0w-30 when summer came around if I had the choice, especially if I was using sub $40 for five quotes bulk oil and running 5,000 mile oil change intervals.

I probably should have hit on “oil film thickness,” but really, that’s not a thing that will present itself unless you lost your radiator and still wanted to PUSH IT TO VALVE FLOAT!!

So yeah, all in all, if you are going to run 5,000 miles OCI, oh run whatever you want with a good filter. 3UR is going to a half million miles as long as you replace chain tensioners somewhere in there (which will also get your cam towers and timing cover resealed in the process). Want to run in 110+ºF while pulling a trailer, off road, in low range, while drunk, doing donuts, screaming Toyoda! Maybe HPL oil made of much more expensive base oils and additives that are blended to such are tighter tolerance time after time, with no VIIs to break down, and if you secretly want a diesel, then run a higher HTHS.

So far my LX has towed ~3500 miles of the 5000 miles I've owned it and then another 700 mile doing 80 mph to St George UT and back. I am ok having a thicker oil since I am spending 95% of my miles under high load and temps and very few truly cold starts.
 
Out of interest I looked up some data on Pennzoil UP and Mobil 1 and my interpretation/logic what that does to the chain tensioner actuator.

Viscosity - For 0W20 and 5W30 the Kinematic Viscosity at operating temperature of 100C or 212F is 8.8 vs 10.3 centi Stokes (PUP) and 8.2 vs 11.1 (M1). That is a 17% to 35% difference, not 3%. Maybe for other brands it is different, would not think so but happy to be shown different.

Start Up - The rotary positive displacement oil pump with more viscous oil is more efficient due to less bypass with 5W30 vs 0W20. It also will stay better in place after shutting down the engine. Then we are back to the oil flow path to the actuator, which I do not have any detailed info on. I do not think it is that tiny that the actuator sees less pressure with more viscous oil. This obviously changes at very low temp conditions. In fact one must consider that the oil does not flow at the actuator, it just pushes against it static. There is no dynamic friction loss, maybe the first few seconds after startup. Therefore oil pressure created by the oil pump is the main factor.

Oil Pump Pressure - Is higher as witnessed by several on this forum going from 0W20 to 5W30. On the internal pressure gauge around 10%. After the oil starts flowing and in say > 0 degr F conditions it will result in higher oil pressure and therefore more force exerted by the tensioner actuator in the same ~10% amount. I doubt the transition period to these operating conditions is much different in time between 0W20 and 5W30 and that it is therefore useful to run the tensioner at effectively around 10% less actuating force using 0W20. Seems to me prolonged use with less tension is not good and increases wear and issues. That goes back to what the engine was designed for in the early 2000's. Based on factory delivery in the first years of 5W30 I therefore conclude the design was based on 10.3 to 11.1 centi Stokes oil which would then be the "sweet spot".

So why does the chain sound disappear upon warm up? One can argue that is the high initial viscosity condition (maybe part of your point Taco2Cruiser). I must say I do not have an immediate direct explanation why it would disappear. The engine and parts heat up and they slightly grow. The actuator housing may grow some and allows the actuator to move out easier with less friction. I do not know for sure or fully can reason this through, I am interested to see if others do know. However, I am more worried about not enough chain tension during hours of operation at temperature which then results in issues. I am also thinking this as BMW on the N57 replaced the chain tensioner for one with a stronger spring (is combined spring and oil pressure operated), so enough chain tensioner force can be an issue.

Happy to hear other aspects to this or disagreement. This is a public forum, shoot me down if you like. Prefer that is with data and engineering logic. Ideally we have a Toyota 3UR-FE engine designer participating. That would be real cool.

View attachment 3712464

View attachment 3712465

Kinematic Viscosity = the absolute viscosity of a liquid divided by its density at the same temperature = In fluid dynamics, it is sometimes more appropriate to work in terms of kinematic viscosity (sometimes also called the momentum diffusivity), defined as the ratio of the dynamic viscosity (μ) over the density of the fluid (ρ). It is usually denoted by the Greek letter nu (ν)

This is for Mobil 1 at 100C or 212F you have 0W20 at 8.2 cSt and 5W30 at 11.1 cSt or a 35% difference

View attachment 3712479

View attachment 3712475
I ended up writing a thesis statement and like 80% of the things I write on here, I decided not to post it. So I'll just try and write bullet points. In no particular order or importance.

Advertised oil specs are what the company shoots for, not exactly what you will get, all the time. For an API certification, all samples don't have to meet spec, just a majority of them.

API reported, they have over 27,000 products licensed globally and analyzes over 1,000 samples annually to assure compliance. Recent results found that 46% of these samples had issues ranging from minor discrepancies to more serious viscosity and NOACK inconsistencies. Some 15% of the samples had "questionable additives" indicating a divergence from the original chemical fingerprints established during licensing.

Oil pressure is up 10%. Okay, so why not go to 20% with 40 weight. What details do you know about the 3UR means more is better? Is there a too much? What is the minimum pressure needed? Is too much pressure wear the tensioner out faster because it is now less likely to deflect and more stress is placed on the tiny components combined with the raw stress of tensioner #1 handling all the forces off the crank while the three other tensioners have double the service life because #1 basically has to take the hit? Ok that last one is what me and a bunch of other Toyota Master Certified Technicians and Master Diagnostic Technicians talked about in great length a few years ago.

Lots of oils fall out of grade when in use, and sometimes in short use. Do a ton of analysis over the miles to know what the oil is capable of. And analysis won't tell you much about the engine despite what some bad information out there says (except for simple things like finding coolant in you oil or a bearing that spun). But for general wear, you need to tear that motor down for that. Back to my 3% comment. Real world testing, I've seen VOA be that close on the same oil in different grades.

Chain tensioners. They leak down. That comes from me tearing these motor apart and finding problems. I ask a lot of questions from the drivers and I combine that with my ASE master certification and a fair number of year of exercise working for the DoD, and buying, modifying non standard vehicles like Toyotas for use in combat. I also would go with the vehicles and make changes if needed while in those area. This is not my research from behind a computer. This is dirty, tangible experience. I hope you don't think I'm saying this in a mean way, or trying to be condescending. I'm just trying to explain with great empathy that it seems today, everyone has forgotten that jut because findings are not on a webpage, it still exists.

There is not one size fits all when it comes to anything.

Ok, my summary. You don't trust the government (don't blame you) and you think the EPA told Toyota that their billion dollar R&D budget and thousands of asians in white lab coats can suck it. Well, I won't say Toyota is perfect, lord knows the 200 has some problems, that's for sure. Either way, I need you to also not trust another company that says their products are what they say they are. I hope that makes sense.

That leaves me with somethings I hate to say, I don't have a solution for you other than do a virgin oil analysis for every oil you buy. Tear your motor down, measure cams and bearings, and inspect rings and walls. Do it again every 30,000 miles. Report back here in 300,000 miles with findings. Buy a second motor also and run a different oil as a good comparison.

And the most important thing I keep saying that it seems people here are getting hung up on viscosity. I simply recommend focusing more on tear downs (I know no one is doing that yet, but one day), analysis, base oils, HTHS, MRV, and consistency from batch to batch. Take that and then bounce it off your use, and make the best decision you can. Bright side, run whatever you want, as long as you change it before it is depleted or too contaminated, it's not going to matter one bit. Your 200 will have so many other issues from 500k miles of wear and tear. But for the motor, meh.

Jerry's final thought (my name is not Jerry). The hot shot driver that took two 2nd gen Tundras to a million miles each. He did the first one with a 4.7L running factory recommended 5W-30. The second one with a 5.7L with factory recommended 0w-20. That is hauling oil industry pumps with fast, hard driving. Just change your oil people. If you want to nerd out, actually nerd out, not debate viscosity.
 
Last edited:
translation if the viscosity you wish to run is documented to be ok in the manual, both for nadm or global the oil is fine so long as you pay attention to the temp range its specified for. Just change it according to the duty schedule you expect to be driving in.

-fin
 
Sorry Taco Cruiser, I am not seeing the argument why to use 0W20 instead of 5W30. Lots of talk washing it all down and no data or engineering logic presented;
- However I can report my engine is running smoother with 5W30 PUP than the Toyota 0W20
- Others have reported chain rattle to go away using 5W30
- Clearly the 3UR-FE was designed for 5W30 and not the thinner 0W20
- 0W20 was only in development by the motor oil suppliers at the time Toyota designed the 3UR-FE for global use focusing on reliability and capability and not some Toyota Corolla or Honda Civic build to be economical including good looking mpg numbers
- How is your claim backed that viscosity reported by Exxon Mobil or Shell/Pennzoil is not correct nor consistent? Shell is going through a special manufacturing process to build a quality base oil from Natural gas. I expect Exxon does a very consistent job as well. Is there data out there to suggest that in fact one bottle of Pennzoil or Mobil 1 5W30 is within 3% of the quoted 0W20 viscosity? Please share that data as for now that makes no sense. I am not talking about Costco or Walmart or some specialty small motor oil producer selling you wonder oil and additives. They may in fact be very consistent as well, but I do not care as 5W30 PUP is quality oil at a fair if not low price.
- I do not think for US applications there is a need to go to W40 as that maybe beyond the sweet spot for chain tension. It may also be better yet than W30. Not sure how we would find out. Do know chain tensioner issues should not be there at 125 to 150k as reported. And what changed after bringing the 3UR-FE on the market...? A switch from 5W30 to 0W20. What a coincidence...
 
Last edited:
Sorry Taco Cruiser, I am not seeing the argument why to use 0W20 instead of 5W30. Lots of talk washing it all down and no data or engineering logic presented;
- However I can report my engine is running smoother with 5W30 PUP than the Toyota 0W20
- Others have reported chain rattle to go away using 5W30
- Clearly the 3UR-FE was designed for 5W30 and not the thinner 0W20
- 0W20 was only in development by the motor oil suppliers at the time Toyota designed the 3UR-FE for global use focusing on reliability and capability and not some Toyota Corolla or Honda Civic build to be economical including good looking mpg numbers
- How is your claim backed that viscosity reported by Exxon Mobil or Shell/Pennzoil is not correct nor consistent? Shell is going through a special manufacturing process to build a quality base oil from Natural gas. I expect Exxon does a very consistent job as well. Is there data out there to suggest that in fact one bottle of Pennzoil or Mobil 1 5W30 is within 3% of the quoted 0W20 viscosity? Please share that data as for now that makes no sense. I am not talking about Costco or Walmart or some specialty small motor oil producer selling you wonder oil and additives. They may in fact be very consistent as well, but I do not care as 5W30 PUP is quality oil at a fair if not low price.
- I do not think for US applications there is a need to go to W40 as that maybe beyond the sweet spot for chain tension. It may also be better yet than W30. Not sure how we would find out. Do know chain tensioner issues should not be there at 125 to 150k as reported. And what changed after bringing the 3UR-FE on the market...? A switch from 5W30 to 0W20. What a coincidence...
I don’t think you read what I’m mainly saying. I’m not saying to only use 0w-20 instead of 5W-30. I’m saving it is a case by case situation and that there are more important things about oil than 20 vs 30. To clarify one last time, I’ve conducted literally thousands of virgin and used oil analysis. I’ve done a lot of internal work on these motors. That’s an aspect of where I found that oils can become within 3% of grades. You do know oil doesn’t stay at the same characteristics when it’s used?

I’ll add something, I mainly run 30 weight in the 200s I run. So no, I’m not against it. It’s a case by case thing, and it’s okay to move between grades based on what you will be doing next.

Anyway, from another recent thread.
Why do all the complicated oil sampling analysis at additional costs, when using 5W30 and 5k intervals is the obvious way?

What will you actually do with the data? Sell your 200 early for no reason because the analysis shows a bit more wear?
You refuse to even consider testing. You have made a blind assumption that 5W-30 is better, yet then demand others to provide data to prove your lack of data false.

Well, they designed the 3UR-FE in the 5 years window prior to 2008 and they did not change it thereafte. Maybe minor tweaks to motor management for the flex fuel version and elastomers used, not any of the main lubrication system components, flowpaths and bearings etc.

0W20 did not even exist. Came out around 2010.

They may have done some calculations and even tests when EPA pushed for it and said ok (engineers or in fact managers/marketing…) as most folk do not keep their vehicles above 100k miles, let alone 200k miles.

I plan to keep my 200 for the next 25y so I like to be able to have no engine wear issue well beyond 200k. There are probably quite a few enthusiasts here who want the same. Originally recommendation was 5W30 and in hotter climates like the Middle East 10W40. Unless you live well north in Canada or Alaska, you do not need 0W. Another route is to use 0W30 or 0W40, they can get expensive and IMO not worth it unless you are going for >500k miles.

Obviously all mileage numbers are indicative to frame what 0W20 and 0W30 or 0W40 can do for you. There is also oil change frequency which will play into engine cleanliness and longevity. 5k is the more conservative way then 10k and again those planning to keep well above 200k miles want to consider this and not follow Toyota/Lexus marketing department.
Wrong. Oil driven chain tensioners, chains, some bearing have had new part numbers over the years. That’s off the top of my head when ordering parts for costumers trucks.

20 weight oil has been around since around 2001 in Japan! A couple years later after much testing, in 2005 Honda was ready for it to be used in their non hybrid engines. Nissan and Toyota were testing 0W-20 during the same time and It was used by Toyota in their production vehicles in Japan since 2009 (that means it was used in development of those motors well before 2009). It only came stateside in 2010 due to the process of API certification. But was absolutely around and in use within Toyota before the 3UR even began being designed.

No hard feelings, but you have made assumptions based off of a lack of knowledge. I’m sure there’s no amount of anything that will get you to think otherwise based on your personality you presented on this forum, and I’m not going to even try past this. In all honestly, I’m not trying to make an enemy. So let’s just agree to disagree and let’s go places, like our separate ways on this one?

I wish you luck, I really hope you cross a million with your 200. If you need any service or work done, I’d be happy to wrench on your truck.

Rob
 
Last edited:
translation if the viscosity you wish to run is documented to be ok in the manual, both for nadm or global the oil is fine so long as you pay attention to the temp range its specified for. Just change it according to the duty schedule you expect to be driving in.

-fin
You sir are a man amongst men.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom