- Thread starter
- #81
Thanks for sharing that. That is some horrific mileage. You do own an LX so you’re not a stranger to that kind of mileage. Now having gone through this, would you have gone with smaller tires or change anything else? I had bigger tires on my t4r with E load. Learned my lesson there. I’m enjoying the soft soccer mom ride until it’s time to get new tires.
Yea it was bad, I agree lol. We came very close to taking the LX instead mostly for it's ability to tow a little better, but it likely wouldn't have done any better in regards to fuel economy. And in the end, the GX did quite well in regards to handling the load so I am glad that I took it and got to see how it handled. In that regard I was very pleased.
I don't think I would go any smaller on lift/tires because on a regular day (no towing, 2-3 people city/hwy driving) I get anywhere between 15-17.5 mpg with my current setup. I am used to full-size trucks and Jeeps on 37's so it's hard for me to accept a small to average build even though I know I don't need all of my vehicles to be lifted on oversized tires. These 285/70's are my idea of a mild/modest build lol. If anything I'll likely go bigger in the future and probably re-gear in an attempt to at least maintain what I currently have in terms of power and economy.
In regards to the LX I am not sure just yet whether or not we will keep it in the long run. I made the misses promise that we would hang on to it for at least two years, that comes next February, that leaves another 10 months of judgement so we shall see. If it gets replaced it'll likely be back to a Ford or RAM 3/4-ton diesel, but it's just too early to tell. I would love to have all three (GX, LX, diesel) but with only two of us in the household it really doesn't make sense. Should we decide to stay in a 200 series it'll be a tough decision between keeping the LX and building it out versus trading it for a late model (2016+) Land Cruiser.