So I have run into a conundrum in the build of my 100 series LandCruiser…I have three paths forward that I can take. I thought I would utilize the collective wisdom of ‘Mud to help make a decision. First, a little background.
I purchased my 2001 LX470 in 2009 with the goal of making it the platform for a multi-year, round-the-world on-road and off-road trip. I have VERY slowly been upgrading towards that goal. Last year, I bought a second LX470, a 2000, to be a future parts vehicle and to have a motor and tranny that can be used in 20 years or whatever. The 2001 just surpassed 102,000 miles and the 2000 just clicked over 111,000. Both are in excellent shape. I have a pick-up and a motorcycle that are my daily drivers.
I am at the point in my build that I need to decide a suspension path to go down and commit to it. The trip itself will be composed of various types of terrain…from fast Autobahn type driving to Alaska Cruiser Trek type obstacles. My major dream is to ship the 100 to Europe and then travel the BAM Road and the Road of Bones in Russia while also taking a major detour down into Kazakhstan and Mongolia. The BAM Road is decrepit railroad service road that has tons of water crossings due to collapsed bridges. A SFA is the best suspension to tackle this portion due to greater lift possibilities, bigger tire possibilities, and great articulation. This is the most ambitious 4x4 adventure I anticipate running into. The rest of the trip consists of corrugated gravel roads, rutted and washed out dirt roads, and some pavement (all a forte of the IFS in the 100).
With these two very different types of road conditions that will be encountered, I realized my mission parameters for the basis of the LandCruiser build are contradictory and problematic. I have had several e-mail discussions with various respected people on ih8mud regarding the upgrading of the suspension of the 100. I had made the focus of my suspension upgrades to deal with the corrugated roads…keep the IFS, keep it stock, and run AT 33’s. However, after running my ideas by Christo, his direction pointed to a SAS. And now I am stuck…what to do? I can see the merits of both the IFS and the SFA…
Option 1 – Keep the OEM IFS system and upgrade shocks all around (ICON), use heavy springs in the back, add front and rear lockers, re-gear, and stay on 33’s. PROS: Most economical of the three upgrade paths, everything is OEM, least amount of deviation from stock geometry, excellent for most roads encountered. CONS: Less durable IFS compared to SAS, lack of great articulation up front, max of 33’s, no major lift possibilities could be problematic with some water crossings in Russia.
Option 2 – Upgrade the IFS system with aftermarket UCA’s, shocks, springs, lockers, re-gear, and move up to 35’s. PRO: Get to 35’s for a somewhat decent cost, excellent driveability on most roads, decent articulation, good lift height. CONS: Moving away from OEM parts and stock geometry, durability of IFS system goes down (steering rack, etc.).
Option 3 – Send to Slee for the SAS treatment, add aftermarket shocks, springs, lockers, re-gear, and possibly 36 to 37 tires. PROS: Excellent durability, ease of dealing with issues in the field, awesome articulation, more easily tackle water crossings due to greater lift options. CONS: Cost, driveability suffers on corrugated roads.
I am really stuck between options one and three. Option two is not really attractive to me as it is too much of a compromise, but I would love to hear a differing opinion as well. Due to the costs of option three, I would probably have to put my 2000 up for sale to help finance the 20K+ SAS job. I like option one though because of the simplicity of the mods and the fact that I can do it all myself. Plus, Bph555 took his all the way to Patagonia and back and that is a testament to the already capable rig that the 100 series LandCruiser truly is. Anyway, feel free to vote in the poll and then respond with your suggestions in the thread.
As an aside, people may mention that I should look at the 80 versus the 100. I agree that the suspension of the 80 is what I am looking for, but the motor is not. I haul my dualsport up to Canada behind the 100 on a trailer and I don’t feel the motor in the 80 would be adequate for my needs. I would be trading one problem for another… Another option would be to go to Nicaragua or Panama or New Zealand and buy a newer 70 series (2007+). Problem is that they are so expensive. I could keep both 100’s and do the Slee SAS in one of them for the cost of a newer VDJ78. HZJ105’s aren’t attractive due to the anemic diesel motor in them. An HDJ100 would be tempting but poses the same suspension issues as the UZJ100.
I purchased my 2001 LX470 in 2009 with the goal of making it the platform for a multi-year, round-the-world on-road and off-road trip. I have VERY slowly been upgrading towards that goal. Last year, I bought a second LX470, a 2000, to be a future parts vehicle and to have a motor and tranny that can be used in 20 years or whatever. The 2001 just surpassed 102,000 miles and the 2000 just clicked over 111,000. Both are in excellent shape. I have a pick-up and a motorcycle that are my daily drivers.
I am at the point in my build that I need to decide a suspension path to go down and commit to it. The trip itself will be composed of various types of terrain…from fast Autobahn type driving to Alaska Cruiser Trek type obstacles. My major dream is to ship the 100 to Europe and then travel the BAM Road and the Road of Bones in Russia while also taking a major detour down into Kazakhstan and Mongolia. The BAM Road is decrepit railroad service road that has tons of water crossings due to collapsed bridges. A SFA is the best suspension to tackle this portion due to greater lift possibilities, bigger tire possibilities, and great articulation. This is the most ambitious 4x4 adventure I anticipate running into. The rest of the trip consists of corrugated gravel roads, rutted and washed out dirt roads, and some pavement (all a forte of the IFS in the 100).
With these two very different types of road conditions that will be encountered, I realized my mission parameters for the basis of the LandCruiser build are contradictory and problematic. I have had several e-mail discussions with various respected people on ih8mud regarding the upgrading of the suspension of the 100. I had made the focus of my suspension upgrades to deal with the corrugated roads…keep the IFS, keep it stock, and run AT 33’s. However, after running my ideas by Christo, his direction pointed to a SAS. And now I am stuck…what to do? I can see the merits of both the IFS and the SFA…
Option 1 – Keep the OEM IFS system and upgrade shocks all around (ICON), use heavy springs in the back, add front and rear lockers, re-gear, and stay on 33’s. PROS: Most economical of the three upgrade paths, everything is OEM, least amount of deviation from stock geometry, excellent for most roads encountered. CONS: Less durable IFS compared to SAS, lack of great articulation up front, max of 33’s, no major lift possibilities could be problematic with some water crossings in Russia.
Option 2 – Upgrade the IFS system with aftermarket UCA’s, shocks, springs, lockers, re-gear, and move up to 35’s. PRO: Get to 35’s for a somewhat decent cost, excellent driveability on most roads, decent articulation, good lift height. CONS: Moving away from OEM parts and stock geometry, durability of IFS system goes down (steering rack, etc.).
Option 3 – Send to Slee for the SAS treatment, add aftermarket shocks, springs, lockers, re-gear, and possibly 36 to 37 tires. PROS: Excellent durability, ease of dealing with issues in the field, awesome articulation, more easily tackle water crossings due to greater lift options. CONS: Cost, driveability suffers on corrugated roads.
I am really stuck between options one and three. Option two is not really attractive to me as it is too much of a compromise, but I would love to hear a differing opinion as well. Due to the costs of option three, I would probably have to put my 2000 up for sale to help finance the 20K+ SAS job. I like option one though because of the simplicity of the mods and the fact that I can do it all myself. Plus, Bph555 took his all the way to Patagonia and back and that is a testament to the already capable rig that the 100 series LandCruiser truly is. Anyway, feel free to vote in the poll and then respond with your suggestions in the thread.
As an aside, people may mention that I should look at the 80 versus the 100. I agree that the suspension of the 80 is what I am looking for, but the motor is not. I haul my dualsport up to Canada behind the 100 on a trailer and I don’t feel the motor in the 80 would be adequate for my needs. I would be trading one problem for another… Another option would be to go to Nicaragua or Panama or New Zealand and buy a newer 70 series (2007+). Problem is that they are so expensive. I could keep both 100’s and do the Slee SAS in one of them for the cost of a newer VDJ78. HZJ105’s aren’t attractive due to the anemic diesel motor in them. An HDJ100 would be tempting but poses the same suspension issues as the UZJ100.