Shocks for a lifted 100

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Yeah, I agree with this. I had a 100 with an OME lift when they still made their Nitro (or were they Hydro?) shocks. Either way, they were the iteration before the current Nitrocharger Sport variety. That suspension seemed to work very well without the harshness. Now, on my current 100, when I had the Nitrocharger Sport shocks (or were they just solid steel bars internally?), they was unnecessarily harsh. I've got front and rear bumpers, and even changing to OEM shocks, it's still well-controlled without being bone-jarring. Granted, I haven't run Baja with this setup, but for everything I've done with it so far, it's performed just fine. Many friends swear by Ironman Foam Cell Pros, but not wanting to spend $200/corner on a 325,000 milie truck, I opted for the OEM shocks. They work fine.

Yeah this is about how I feel and the system only being about two years old I am 99% sure that it is the NitroCharger Sport shocks. One of those that I feel just about every crack in the road especially when the tires are cold. On the highway you feel the transitions in the road, especially at bridges. I have heard great things about the Foamcell Pros too but yeah, $200/corner is a bit more than I want to spend even at only 202K. I think the ToughDog shocks are a bit cheaper with their 40mm front and 45mm or 53mm Ralph in the rear.
 
+1 ToughDog fan
 
Dobinsons, Slee, Radflo and Icon (Just differentials kit, for example) all sell longer than OEM shocks for lifted applications. Overall performance and off-road ride quality is improved after lifting the vehicle, especially on the front (with proper UCA's). This is a notable difference. Most of these shock lengths are published on this forum and on the vendor's sites. From my research the extended length Dobinson's and Icon's have the most extension, which we want with our front ends, provided we've extended the sway bar end links, have proper UCA's for clearing the shocks on full droop, and have a diff drop installed.

Well i have everything but the extended sway bar links (OME medium 1.5 lift kit, Slee diff drop, SPC UCAs and Dobinson IMS shocks (just got the front extended travel ones, haven't installed them yet). How critical are the extended sway bar links?
 
While I’d generally agree that a lifted 100 series is not going to ride and handle like a stock 100 series, I don’t agree that it has to ride like crap to be a "real" off road vehicle.

I’ve got three 100 series in the driveway. At this point in time, I’ve been able to compare stock vs lifted, and lifted brand X vs brand Y, side by side in multiple variations.

The ~2014 vintage OME medium kit on my son’s 2000 LC reminds me of an overly harsh C4 Corvette that I used to have. It felt great and sporty on a perfectly smooth surface and acceptable on rougher surfaces, up until the point where I drove my roommate’s Porsche 928, which was more compliant/controlled/balanced in almost every circumstance. Neither was a luxury car ride, and admittedly the 928 was more of a GT than a sports car, but the engineers at Porsche obviously spent a whole lot more time on their suspension decisions than “let’s just make it stiff, because it will turn better”.

With the limited front suspension travel of the 100 series, I have no illusion of it being a rock crawler, nor a Baja racer.

I would like mine to be compliant/balanced enough to drive on the street, and firm/controlled enough to take off road. The stock Toyota shocks seem too light/soft to me. The OME Nitro Sport Shocks seem too harsh/firm. (Just call me Goldilocks.) The Tough Dog foam cell shocks have seemed to be a move in the right direction for me.

I’ve been somewhat reluctant to get into the rebuildable, racing style shocks, due to cost and maintenance, but since I’ve added an extra 100 series, maybe it’s time to get my feet wet. I’ve got a set of Dobinsons IMS/MRA shocks on the way, and I’ll see how those do. Maybe it would’ve been cheaper and easier to just throw one of the full blown Icon/Just Differentials/Slinky kits on all three of them at the start, and just be done with it.

Good thoughts. I’m coming from a 40 on leafs so I think my lifted 100 rides like a caddy. I’ve heard good stuff about the Tough Dog’s foams. I think you’ll need to step into the high end stuff to satisfy your cravings... Icon comes to mind.
 
Good thoughts. I’m coming from a 40 on leafs so I think my lifted 100 rides like a caddy. I’ve heard good stuff about the Tough Dog’s foams. I think you’ll need to step into the high end stuff to satisfy your cravings... Icon comes to mind.

I've been fairly pleased with the 41/45mm Tough Dog shocks, but yes I do seem to be slowly working my way toward the Icons (or equivalent).

The MRA's three different adjusters should keep me occupied for a while though.
 
I find myself in a similar situation. Shocks? I have 2 100's and the '99 is riding on Ironman suspension and is my regular go-to vehicle. Drives and handles washboard very well. The second truck in an '02 and has OME suspension, and although I have not driven it very much, it seems like a much harsher ride. I have returned the OME shock that were for the '02 and am now trying to decide which route to go.The Dobinson IMS shocks are intriguing and it is news to me that the Pro Foam shocks are now different than their predecessors. I am in Canada so the pricing is crazy expensive regardless, but I want to make an informed decision and not have a shock that rides like crap. Looking forward to hearing the ride quality results from the Dobinson IMS shocks.
 
I put new OEM shocks with 866 springs and it rides like a dream with plenty of up travel. Sitting at 21.75 to the hub on the front and a lil over 22 to in the back. For 40 bucks a shock it’s hard to beat.
 
I put new OEM shocks with 866 springs and it rides like a dream with plenty of up travel. Sitting at 21.75 to the hub on the front and a lil over 22 to in the back. For 40 bucks a shock it’s hard to beat.
From previous posts, it seems the OEM shocks will not support the added weight I have. Both trucks have ARB bumpers and winches (well almost), plus swing out rear bumpers, roof rack, RTT's and fridge/drawers.
 
From previous posts, it seems the OEM shocks will not support the added weight I have. Both trucks have ARB bumpers and winches (well almost), plus swing out rear bumpers, roof rack, RTT's and fridge/drawers.
Coil springs and torsion bars support weight, shocks do not.
 
Coil springs and torsion bars support weight, shocks do not.

True, although shock valving does play a role in controlling the motion of additional weight, and controlling the stronger springs that are used to support additional weight.
 
I put new OEM shocks with 866 springs and it rides like a dream with plenty of up travel. Sitting at 21.75 to the hub on the front and a lil over 22 to in the back. For 40 bucks a shock it’s hard to beat.
Are these typical measurements bc I have wondered how high I could go before there was problem.
 
From previous posts, it seems the OEM shocks will not support the added weight I have. Both trucks have ARB bumpers and winches (well almost), plus swing out rear bumpers, roof rack, RTT's and fridge/drawers.
I'm running OEM shocks with Slee bumpers, winch, sliders, Slee skid plates - zero issues. Rides / handles well, off-roads well - have over 100k miles on this setup.
 
I am wondering if something has changed in recent years for the OME setups. Seems like those that have had the setup for 5yrs. + seem to feel that it is a nice ride, compliant and smooth. Where conversely those with newer setups (mine is less than 5yrs old as PO put it on) seem to all think that it rides harshly. Or could just be the thing that regardless OME needs some added weight to get pull compliance from everything.
 
From previous posts, it seems the OEM shocks will not support the added weight I have. Both trucks have ARB bumpers and winches (well almost), plus swing out rear bumpers, roof rack, RTT's and fridge/drawers.

Can't lose with ironman pro foam cells.
 
I am wondering if something has changed in recent years for the OME setups. Seems like those that have had the setup for 5yrs. + seem to feel that it is a nice ride, compliant and smooth. Where conversely those with newer setups (mine is less than 5yrs old as PO put it on) seem to all think that it rides harshly. Or could just be the thing that regardless OME needs some added weight to get pull compliance from everything.

To me OME shocks ride like dog**** compared to most everything else. Even with bumpers/winch/etc.
 
Well i have everything but the extended sway bar links (OME medium 1.5 lift kit, Slee diff drop, SPC UCAs and Dobinson IMS shocks (just got the front extended travel ones, haven't installed them yet). How critical are the extended sway bar links?
Sorry I'm late to this, and I'm not sure if you've already pulled the trigger on the extended end links.... But, I found that I was trashing the stock end links (breaking them) on the front due to having more extension with my extended Dobinson's. Extension also felt harsher on the front with the stock links when driving through woops etc... Everything feels much smoother when the suspension extends now and I'm not trashing the oem links. On the rear, my sway bar was actually hitting the rear shock on the extended end without the longer links. The longer links extended the sway below where it was hitting the shock body, therefore clearing the shock upon full extension.
 
So in both cases the extended sway bar links are a winner?
 
Last edited:
So in both cases the extended sway bar links are a winner?
I am reading that when it comes to articulation of the suspension they are a winner. If it is a mall crawler with a lift, then not necessarily needed.
 
I just received my OEM shocks will be replacing my OME after a year, i cant stand the harsh ride anymore, im very light weight. Im wondering if the OEM shock lengeth is the same as OME.
 
I am reading that when it comes to articulation of the suspension they are a winner.
Only partially. They help with downtravel but conversely limit uptravel by binding sooner. This is problematic on “lifted” trucks because downtravel is already reduced.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom