Just made a similar decision . . . .
I'm retired & my wife has a 4 mile roundtrip commute to work (when she doesn't walk).
Like you, our DDs, 2 88 FJ62s & a 00 Tundra 4WD, get around 11-13 & 13-16 respectively (EPA's new
estimates).
We were looking for a new XUV which would get better mileage & still meet our desire to take a dirt road if we wanted to. Drove Mazda CX7, Toyota Matrix (2.4L), Nissan Rogue & Xterra (14-20 mpg). X was the only one capable to meet our lifestyle with confidence parts would remain intact.
We looked at CRV, RAV4 & FJ Cruiser, but didn't like them.
Market reality, look at 2008 mpg estimates = automakers have yet to improve mpg in XUVs much over say, 2005 models. Most are offering higher HP rather than better MPG (ie: Matrix 2.4L from Camry; well new 5.7 Tundra does get 1 MPG better on highway); or a CUV on a car platform (can you say
station wagon?).
We decided that in 2-3 years' time automakers
should have better mpg in
all vehicles.
Wife's botom line: FJ62s lacked
throttle response, air bags, cruise; and drip oil on garage floor.
Our compromise: '97 LX450 = 1 MPG better than FJ62s, so our gas bill stays same. Sell off FJ62s = LX purchase price (hopefully). Insurance less, as total # drops by 1 FJ62 (liability only).
Our game plan:
Wait out automakers' introduction of clean diesels & other MPG improvements for 2-3 years. Save depreciation $ on new 2008. Continue putting a new payment amount (less higher fuel costs) into bank. We'd then like to buy a high MPG vehicle & drive the LX450 only when 4WD is needed.
I made this decision once before,
IN 1980! Anyone seen what a clean 1977 FJ55 is going for these days? Wonder what the 2WD Hilux stretched cab dually I traded it for is worth today?
