ed97fzj80 said:
This Tire Rack
write-up shows good ways to go about it.
good suggestions and info, but once again, their nubers are off.
it's 25%, not 20%. here's why:
if you have 4 tires, and you get 40k out of them, then you put 40k on each tire. if you have 8 tires and rotate full sets (one set on for 5k miles, then the other set - full swaps), then you would get 80k out of the 8 tires. if you rotated them in by pairs or singles every 5k miles, then you'd still use all the tires by the end and you'd still get 80k out of the 8 tires.
what am i getting at? 4 tires = 40k. with 8 tires, you get and additional 40k.
with that same logic, if you had only 6 tires and you rotated them into the mix, then you would cut that 40k mile extension in half, since you only have half the extra tires. (see where this is going?)
with 6 tires, you get 20k extra. using that same logic, with 5 tires you would get half that, or 10k extra.
now for the hard math.
40k + 10k = 50k total mileage.
50k / 40k = 1.25 or 125% for a 25% increase
by their logic, you pay 25% more for that extra matching tire and only get 20% more mileage out of the set, so it's LOOSING MONEY. when you do the math correctly, you see that it's a wash on the value of the tires. you don't save any money by having 5 tires instead of 4, but you do get to wait longer inbetween trips to get new ones.
now THAT was a waste of time, wasn't it???
