Retro Tacoma w/ 80 series SFA from SEMA show tested

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Threads
65
Messages
346
Location
Charlotte, NC
I like the 80 series suspension concept on a mini. The rest is all stickers and bolt on stuff that I could do without.
 
The project team responsible for building the BTTF truck cribbed the front axle from a 1990-97 Toyota Land Cruiser FJ80, along with much of the rest of the front running gear plus the rear axle (though it uses leaf springs, not the FJ80's multilink setup).

I think I just threw up a little.

The rear multilink setup is one of the strongest points about the 80's suspension. I suppose leaf is cheaper and easier, but why throw that away?

(Yeah yeah, different goals than rock crawling.)
 
They probably kept the leaf suspension because it was far easier to adapt to the frame. Seems odd that they bothered swapping in the 80 rear axle as well and transmission and transfer case. Wasn't really needed at all as the stock rear axle is probably close to the same width as the 80 front axle anyway.

I doubt they were trying to copy the 80's overall design. To do that, they'd have to start from scratch, including dumping the garbage Dana designed and made C-channel Tacoma frame and put in a real 1 ton frame. Like maybe one from a "real" Toyota like the Hilux.

I wonder how many holes they blew through the frame trying to weld brackets to hold that axle in place and frankly I wouldn't trust that rig off road, if my life actually depended on it. And it sounds like builders agree as they say in the article, they wouldn't trust it for more than just fire roads. If that's the case, then what good is it? I'd rather have the stock IFS Tacoma if it's limited to just flat dirt roads.

Now, I've seen those axles mounted on "real" Toyota mini-trucks like the '95 and older versions and I had an SAS mini-truck myself. It rocked and they worked awesome. I used an '85 front axle on an '89 IFS mini-truck, but I always dreamed of bolting in an 80 front axle for the extra width.

Then I decided to just buy the whole thing instead. And never looked back. Sorry don't mean to be a party pooper. This just hit a cord with me, that goes back to when Toyota seperated their real truck, the Hilux and created the cheap non-Japanese designed version called the Tacoma. I'll get off my high horse now.
 
Last edited:
I like it. I find this statement funny:

ts fabrication came together so quickly last year that Toyota didn’t have time to finish up the last few tweaks required to complete the bullet-proof capabilities it needs to match its looks. It’ll run, but only on dirt trails and flat fire roads.

However, the article goes on to say that Toyota will further develop this truck. :hhmm:

I'm with everyone else.... Will we ever see a production date? :popcorn:
 
I wonder how many holes they blew through the frame trying to weld brackets to hold that axle in place and frankly I wouldn't trust that rig off road, if my life actually depended on it. And it sounds like builders agree as they say in the article, they wouldn't trust it for more than just fire roads. If that's the case, then what good is it? I'd rather have the stock IFS Tacoma if it's limited to just flat dirt roads.

It's a concept.


[inmydreams="on"]

I'll bet that if Toyota does end up producing a truck like this, they'll bring in a Hilux frame.

[/dream]
 
2.4 liter 22r? Thought it was 2.2 liter.
 
I had a 94 Hilux I bought new and boy was it a great little truck. This truck just brings back alot of good memories however I doubt id ever buy one. As someone else said...its mostly just stickers and bolt ons. :cheers:
 
2.4 liter 22r? Thought it was 2.2 liter.

22R was a 2.4L. A buddy of mine owned two, a 1988 2WD pickup and 1985.5 4Runner (EFI and SFA :grinpimp:).

He's still kicking himself for selling the Runner. :lol:

EDIT: Beat me to the punch :flipoff2:
 
Interior is ugly as (edit). I think its a kind of a cool throw back but...not in my garage. It should have been like the real Back to the Future truck, black on black rims. That would have been way better.
 
22r's and 22re's were 2.4L.

Huh, always assumed 2.2. Either way, I'd give anything to have my '88 sr5 4wd 22re back. It was big s*** with 31" bfg's. :hillbilly: In '96 I traded it for a Civic. :doh:
 
Those "20 year old seats" would go quite nicely in my 18 year old oak interior, I like the retro look....I also think it's cool knowing that there's at least a small group at Toyota thinking of some decent stuff. What if Mr. T actually gave real bumpers and other gear as options on new 4Runs and LC's?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom