ReDesign? 2019 or? (2 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Initial quality usually has very little to do with reliability. Initial quality often focuses on fit and finish, and the number of minor details that need to be addressed such as interior trim, seatbelt issues, windshield seals, blah blah blah. It is usually not related to the engine since there are hundreds of Interior and X terrier doodads that can add up quickly against initial quality, but the engine is a comparatively small factor in the “initial quality” equation.

Quality control on engines rarely show up “initially.” So things like door handles, and low-end mech stuff gets judged for that initial review.

Have a look at long term reliability?
-Toyota and Ford are worlds apart.
 
I’d put money down that it’s a
NOT-naturally-aspirated 6.

That's what I got from it also, he (Dave) was trying to say it without actually saying it.
 
That's what I got from it also, he (Dave) was trying to say it without actually saying it.

Exactly.

And two other highly-connected, world renowned others have commented similarly.
 
Other predictions:

I will bet the iconic 100 and 200 series slab sided D pillar will be gone in favor of a more Infiniti style look.

More aggressive overall styling as with most of their other new models.

Also, Toyota thinks the gaping maw on the new Avalon looks good,


2019-Toyota-Avalon-Limited-Hybrid-front.jpg


so who knows what the stock bumpers on the 300 will be like. Not an improvement is my guess.
 
Last edited:
Other predictions:

I will bet the iconic 100 and 200 series slab sided D pillar will be gone in favor of a more Infiniti style look.

More aggressive overall styling as with most of their other new models.

Also, Toyota thinks the gaping maw on the new Avalon looks good,


2019-Toyota-Avalon-Limited-Hybrid-front.jpg


so who knows what the stock bumpers on the 300 will be like. Not an improvement is my guess.

The high level rep in Breck described the opposite.

He said it would take a decidedly more “military look.”

I personally take that to mean less curvy and more utilitarian looking...and big, flashy grills do not scream military.

If they harken back to a more utilitarian look...somewhere between the bulbous 200 and the troopy—with its interior metal panels...I’d be pretty pleased.
 
Wow, that's encouraging.

Either way, I can't afford dropping 100,000 dollars on the 300, nor have I ever bought the first version of anything. It's the used market for me.
 
Last edited:
Wow, that's encouraging.

Either way, I can't afford dropping 100,000 dollars on the 300, nor have I ever bought the first version of anything. It's the used market for me.

Heh... Me too.
I said somewhere earlier in this thread...

-“The only thing I can predict with absolute certainty about the 300 Series...is that I won’t be able to afford a used one until about six years after it’s release.” Or some such verbiage...

:hillbilly:
 
Personally I think the current 4Runner looks fantastic in the more off-road oriented trims.. if they take any ques from that I’ll be happy.

And yes, port+direct is almost a given, but even then you have a high pressure fuel pump that puts more emphasis on fuel quality and filtration, etc.

I am not an engineer.

But from personal experience, my 1993 MR2 (4cyl Turbo) with 225K miles (am original owner), and my 1995 Supra (I-6 Twin Sequential Turbo) TT (132k miles-am original owner), haven't had any turbo issues.

Neither of those vehicles were designed for anything like the use case of a landcruiser. Towing being an obvious example of the huge difference in design philosophy.
 
Most likely the 300 series will actually start to share parts with the Highlander vs just the looks ;)

5.7l Highlander base model. 5.7 highlanderCruiser.Sport model. 5.7HighLexusLanderTRD.
 
Last edited:
Most likely the 300 series will actually start to share parts with the Highlander vs just the looks ;)

5.7l Highlander base model. 5.7 highlanderCruiser.Sport model. 5.7HighLexusLanderTRD.

Name=Highland Cruiser 200.1
 
Any reason to not buy a 2018 now, as opposed to waiting for the 2019's to hit the lot?

Read the link in post number 10 of this thread and decide for yourself if your question revolves around a series change.
 
Read the link in post number 10 of this thread and decide for yourself if your question revolves around a series change.

I'm guessing its safe to assume 2019's will not be a 300 series. Which, I am totally fine with. I'd rather buy at the end of the 200 series model run, rather than being a guinea pig on the 300s.

Local inventory of LC's must be running out in my area, prices of the trucks left on the lots are gradually increasing; most cars I would have assumed do the opposite.
 
So, looking for some help here folks. Any chance there will be the addition of full speed adaptive cruise or maybe even the lane tracing that will be in the 2019 Corolla and rav4? I have been waiting and waiting for the land cruiser to get updated with full speed adaptive cruise because it’s the only vehicle in think is worth the money but driving a Tacoma every day is wearing down on me. What would you guys drive that combines the capability of the land cruiser with the stress relief of full speed adaptive cruise in the interim?
 
Only Toyota knows what's coming in the 2019 model year. I suspect no changes from 2018.

2013+ have radar-based adaptive cruise control. Not sure what you mean by "full speed adaptive cruise".
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom