rear main seal thoughts. (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Nice reseal job Jerry!

@ibrahim83 As I recall the pan can be resealed without pull rear seal plate. (see Unicorn) So seal plate can be pulled and resealed, without removing pan. But very likely you've the oil pump o-ring leaking also. You'd need to pull pans to get at the front (oil pump) o-ring.. Issue you'll have pulling pan engine in. Is keeping oil off FIPG seal area during assemble. If not kept dry and clean, FIPG will likely leak.

My bet, the 2UZ leak, because HM oil was used. Especial if O-rings damage.

I'm helping with an 07 VVT w/200K now. That HM (high mileage oil) was used in. Seems every o-ring is weeping. W'e re trying Mobil 1 oil along AT-205, to clean and recondition seals. I've hopes it will slow leaks to manageable level. We should know by this summer. .
Does high mileage oil cause more leaks? Any cons to putting at-205 in oil?
 
I've and 00 w/~360K miles, no oil leaks.

I'm not big on adding as a PM. But should not hurt. Manufacture of AT-205 is a seal maker. They explained to me, AT-205 is a plasticizer, using adds back what time and certain condition have cause to deplete. But use only amount specified (~1.33 oz per qt of oil). I've used on many rubber products (auto, shop and household) for about 3-4 years now. So far, I've not seen any adverse effects.

I'm considering adding to rear differentials. Why there! Because if we get axle seal leak, it can damage axle bearings. I've run into two for sure rear axle seal leaks. Also 2 possible weeps.

One thing that happens is cheapo oil & gear lubes used, and poor flushing intervals. Gunk builds up on seals (seems more so than on o-rings) like axle, cam and crank seals. Gunk will draw out plasticize and dry seal IMHO. We then come along, and use synthetic oils. Which cleans away gunk and we then see leaks/weeps. We get very good results with AT-205, in these cases. With age related plasticize depletion ( dry seals shrunken seals), we get good results also. Damaged seals, well, they need replacing. If damage from use of HM oil, IMO it depends on how long ago and how damaged. But that's still a question I have if at all effective with those.
 
Last edited:
^^^ Im not sure of the effect of AT-205 on rear diff LSD friction surface but I'd research the potential effects of it before adding to rear diff.
 
I replaced it and the front seals a few days ago.
I've always had drips from the window looking at the flexplate. Not bad drips, but drips, and they were getting worse.
Also I had some leak at the front. From either the timing belt tensioner pulley bolt, the front main seal, or low oil pan. (not dipstick penetrator)

And this is why I'm posting it.
There is an oring behind the front oil pump plate and the rear main seal retainer. They are the same part number. I do believe my rear drip issue was from this o ring. I don't really know where my front leak was coming from but both these o rings were very hard and came out in chunks. I'm sure both were original. These are outside of the fipg seal area.

You can see it in the pics.
If you're replacing the front or rear seals, it would be a very good idea to replace these also. I'm my case I doubt either front or rear main seals were bad.
but- here's something weird, two of my flexplate bolts were very wet with oil, the other six were dry. In my mind, it would be very hard to just replace the rear main without taking the retainer off also and getting at the O ring. I do think you could do it with the tranny out and engine in place but it would be very awkward to clean it down on the floor and also verify that your sealing surface with the upper oil pan was spotless. Doing it that way isn't the book method but I imagine it's possible.

The mission creep is real, and dangerous. Oh, and if partsouq is selling fake parts, I'm totally F-ed. I think my toyota budget is blown for the year.

View attachment 2621235

View attachment 2621236

View attachment 2621238

View attachment 2621239

View attachment 2621240

Three of my vehicles have a type of aluminum timing cover, seal, and upper oil pan that reminds me of this problem. The tricky part is to install the cover with RTV on the lower part that butts up against the upper oil pan without removing the upper oil pan. If you don't have the upper oil pan removed, the RTV just scrapes off and goes down into the oil pan. It does not end well.

Like we see in the picture, there are guide pins that force the cover to be mounted straight on so the bolts will align. There is an insider trick for that engine to remove the guide pins, and to not install the seal until the end. That allows the cover to be tilted at a slight angle for installation without the bottom (where the RTV is located) pressing up against the upper oil pan until the end when the lower bolts are partially and the cover is pulled into the upper oil pan. Then once the cover is in place and the bolts are started, the guide pins can be inserted from the outside. Note these are aluminum blocks where the guide pins can be easily removed and reinstalled if they get in the way. It may not be possible with an iron block. And then there is the issue of making sure the o-ring doesn't get pinched in the process.

If I'm faced with this situation in the future, I might pull the engine and do an all-out reseal.
 
Last edited:
^^^ Im not sure of the effect of AT-205 on rear diff LSD friction surface but I'd research the potential effects of it before adding to rear diff.
They list LSD as a use, they also build diff.. I first used in a 100 series rear diff, about two years ago. That one has about 15K miles on it now, no issues reported.


Re-Seal​

PART NUMBER : AT-205

Features & Benefits​

AT-205 Re-Seal is a fast, effective and safe stop-leak for all rubber seals and gaskets. The exclusive formulation restores worn or dried out seals and is not harmful to internal bearings and components.

Stops leaks in:
Engine - Gasoline and Diesel
Transmission - Automatic and Manual
Power Steering - Rack & Pinion and Steering Box
Differential - Conventional, Limited Slip and Locker
Hydraulic Systems - Plows, Lifts, Jacks and Industrial Equipment
(Do not use in brakes)
  • Professional strength, fast acting resealer
  • Compatible with conventional and synthetic oils, ATF, gear oil, power steering fluids and hydraulic oil
  • Does not contain petroleum distillates, will not over-swell or breakdown seals

Disclosure. I do not on stock in ATP....LOL May be I should!

 
Last edited:
Does high mileage oil cause more leaks? Any cons to putting at-205 in oil?
To very clearly answer the first part of your question: YES HM oil causes leaks.

It was first stated to me in mud, back some years ago. "It's like running your engine on "crack"".

I called Mobil 1 support, on the issues of HM oil. They said:
If HM oil used for two oil changes, it must then always be use. It is a petroleum based seal modifier.

HM oil should come with a warning. Addictive, long term use kills!
Many including myself want the best for their engine. We see High Mileage on the jug of oil and think; Yeah, that's my rig! HM.

I once installed it. Fortunately mud saved me from the addition. I had in less than 500 miles.
 
I just ended up removing the plate, cleaning everything 100% and fpig'ing everything back including the bottom of the metal plate that sits on the upper oil pan.

The o ring was plastic at this point. I'm pissed I missed the front one when I did the timing belt and cam and crank seals last month, oh well.

I also used synthetic oil (not high mileage) twice when I first got her. The leak started around that time. This was 4 or 5 years ago at 135k. Currently at 183k

Question is, considering the seals are new, can I go back to synthetic?

20210418_105439.jpg


20210418_105454.jpg


20210418_123409.jpg


20210418_123433.jpg


20210418_125952.jpg
 
Last edited:
Synthetic oil does not hurt seals. Some find leaks after its use, Why! IMHO it cleans seals and reveals issue already there.
 
They list LSD as a use, they also build diff.. I first used in a 100 series rear diff, about two years ago. That one has about 15K miles on it now, no issues reported.


Re-Seal​

PART NUMBER : AT-205

Features & Benefits​

AT-205 Re-Seal is a fast, effective and safe stop-leak for all rubber seals and gaskets. The exclusive formulation restores worn or dried out seals and is not harmful to internal bearings and components.

Stops leaks in:
Engine - Gasoline and Diesel
Transmission - Automatic and Manual
Power Steering - Rack & Pinion and Steering Box
Differential - Conventional, Limited Slip and Locker
Hydraulic Systems - Plows, Lifts, Jacks and Industrial Equipment
(Do not use in brakes)
  • Professional strength, fast acting resealer
  • Compatible with conventional and synthetic oils, ATF, gear oil, power steering fluids and hydraulic oil
  • Does not contain petroleum distillates, will not over-swell or breakdown seals

Disclosure. I do not on stock in ATP....LOL May be I should!


I tried the AT-205 on 2 of my cars recently:

A. I used the full bottle in the LX Crankcase (filled w/ M1 5W-30) to cure a RMS leak and approx 1 ounce in the PS fluid (M1 ATF) to stave off a small PS leak at the rack. Results: Turns out that it was not the RMS but the oil pump o-ring, and the AT-205 was not effective on that. More troubling (for me), the next day the PS fluid reservoir was filled with froth and the pump was groaning and assist was intermittent. Flushed all of the froth out and refilled w/ M1 ATF and the groaning went away and assist is back.

B. I used it in my E36 engine'd E30's PS reservoir to stave of a small rack leak. It also frothed and even worse, the pump groaned to the point of complete loss of assist and me shopping for a NLA pump. Just because, I drained it out as well, and replaced with M1 ATF. Fingers crossed but that did the trick. Assist is back and the pump is back to silent.

Cliffs: In both my applications, the PS reservoirs were previously filled with M1 ATF and I then added a prescribed amount of AT-205 to stop small leaks. In both instances, it caused excessive frothing of the fluid causing loss of assist and loud PS pumps. Countermeasure: drained and refilled with 100% M1 ATF. Result: Operation back to normal, no improvements on leaks. It was also not effective for me to stop a oil pump oring from leaking.

I'm not sold on the AT-205.
 
I just bought some attempting to stop what I think is also a rear main seal. Based on responses so far, it may be the oil pump o-ring instead.
I'll reply after a bit to let you know how it went.
 
I need to replace my Rear Main Seal also. Is this the O-ring everyone is saying to replace? or is it the O-ring where the Oil pump is? If so, Isn't the Oil pump in front of the motor?

Screen Shot 2021-04-26 at 3.05.18 PM.png
 
I need to replace my Rear Main Seal also. Is this the O-ring everyone is saying to replace? or is it the O-ring where the Oil pump is? If so, Isn't the Oil pump in front of the motor?

View attachment 2659050
Apparently there's two identical ones. One in the front and one in the back.

I only did the one in the back, as that's where I was working.
 
Apparently there's two identical ones. One in the front and one in the back.

I only did the one in the back, as that's where I was working.
Thanks for the quick reply...

So the rear main seal, FIPG, and that O-ring was the only thing you replaced? and did this solve leaking problem?
 
Thanks for the quick reply...

So the rear main seal, FIPG, and that O-ring was the only thing you replaced? and did this solve leaking problem?
Yes, rear main seal, o ring, and Toyota fpig.

500 miles, zero leaks with synthetic oil.

I finally reinstalled my skid plates after 2 years 😄
 
Bumping this thread again, this had some great info.

I am replacing my engine with a new/used one that has 220k on it. Does everyone recommend doing the o rings on the front and back as well as the rear main seal while I have the engine out? No time line to get it reinstalled so I can take my time. Or is this job too much of a PITA if they aren’t leaking on the new engine?
 
Bumping this thread again, this had some great info.

I am replacing my engine with a new/used one that has 220k on it. Does everyone recommend doing the o rings on the front and back as well as the rear main seal while I have the engine out? No time line to get it reinstalled so I can take my time. Or is this job too much of a PITA if they aren’t leaking on the new engine?
Do everything you can before installing the new engine. It is easier and you dont have to worry about it for another 200k miles.
 
I suspect the RMS in my 06 LX is leaking, and I was also told that by a mechanic.

My oil consumption is nil, and the oil underneath isn't much at all.

Is this (replacing RMS, O-ring etc) something you guys put off until oil consumption or oil leaking oil is more notable?
Is there risk of catastophic failure of anything with a "watch and monitor" plan?

I've checked and tightened VCG bolts and don't feel they are contributing.
 
I waited till there was a quarter sized drop after 8 hours cool down, and I had two weeks, and it was not 100 degrees outside.
I never burned oil or lost oil either between 5-6k oil change intervals.
 
Mine is at Toyota the moment having the Rear Main Seal replaced.
I'm a little put out in that the truck has only done 150k KM - which is just 93k miles.

Is my failure due to age rather than wear and 'tear'?

Actually - to be honest - I say 'tear' above - but the pun is intended as it's all been fixed under warranty - so not to many tears here.
They are also doing the water pump and the starter under warranty - so my tears are actually a little smile.
$900 NZD ($540 USD) for the lot. Score!

But the question remains - even though it's well lubricated - do Rear Main Seals need replacing simply because of age?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom