Well, little has progressed with the kids going back to school but I did manage to get the engine out of the 79 series.
In speaking with a roads engineer, the guy who approves changes to cars here in Australia, he had a big issue with cutting the 45 chassis and widening it and also the body work I was doing. He seemed to think that it wouldn't be able to register and that it needed an 'identity'. After some thinking as he said about this 4 door body was it done by the manufacturer. I went back to him with information about the FJ45V that came out and said this was what I was looking at reproducing. Anyway, its back in his court. (and I can't use the 79 series chassis as it is shaped like a banana and the chassis can't be registered again, ever, statutory write off - damaged bad enough to be deemed unsafe by registration authority)
Been measuring the engine, it's 800mm wide at the top and 530 wide near the bottom. There is the turbo hanging on the side as well. The 45 chassis is 610mm wide between the rails so it will be a close fit on the turbo side but can be done. The innerguards will have to be a custom fit to go around the width of the engine and still have room to get hands down the side etc...
It's at the rear end where I am going to have problems in running the Patrol coil sprung rear end. As the engineer wont allow the chassis to be widened the spring hats are right smack bang where the chassis rails run. This causes people to cut the chassis at this area or move the spring perches on the diff. I don't really want to change the axle set up and cutting into the chassis is also a right pain in the backside to get engineered now. If I was going the 45 with Patrol axles, I would have to pass the swerve test, where the car has to pass between 4 sets of cones in a lane change scenario. It's done with driver and then done fully laidened up to the GVM. Interesting to say the least and I would have to drive the car doing the test!.
So, think I might take another look at the 80 series chassis I have here as it might be easier to use that. I would have loved to have kept it all 40 series, but I won't get the end result that I am looking for by using it without cutting the 1 tubular section and removing the 2 riveted sections and replacing with wider bits. The chassis strength would not be compromised, but as both engineers I have spoken to say, widening the chassis is a big no no. As the 80 already has the spring hat setup I save a bit of time and money fabricating the suspension bits, but will have to look at adding 200mm (8") to the wheelbase by either moving whats there or adding it into the chassis.
Overall, the 80 chassis is looking the better and easier option although meeting the 1996 ADR's adds a few complication in, but that shouldn't be too much of a drama. These are things like collapsible steering columns (the 79 series has one I can use) child seat anchor points, it's a non abs car so that doesn't change anything there and possibly a few other things that I need to get my head around, but it will give me 660mm in the engine bay between rails, manufacturers coils suspension set up on the +'s on the -'ves a shorter wheelbase, (can be engineered lengthened chassis) more ADR's to meet, full registration ($650pa) for another 8 years until the thing is 25 years old, then it qualifies for club rego ($80pa) and some moving of the chassis mounted body brackets (I have a few to choose from as I will have the 79 series ones as well as the 45 ones to use as well as the existing 80 series ones)
Anyway, I'll chat to the engineer again. Would love him to come back and say, stuff it, lets widen the chassis, but he wont as they sign off on the thing and can be in serious trouble for dodgy engineering certificates. So, decision time again soon as to which way I head.
At least lifting the engine and box out didnt pull the shed roof down, but it did creak a bit.
Ready for the trolley I made up for it the other day.
80 series chassis I have sitting out back. Luckily I held onto it, was going to sell it a few months ago after I made my mind up on using the 45 chassis and widening the thing. 80's chassis are good for flex so just a matter of wheelbase and what to do. Bloody stupid rules and regs we have here.