bull said:
ok I'm done...you haven't even read what I have posted...
Me too Bull. Somebody (

) on this thread misquoted me then attacked me. That's OK though.
He said I've said the T-Bar is "progressive". I never said that. In fact, I've said that the T-bar is NOT progressive.
The T-bar "system" is progressive however, especially at the bars twisting limits. The rate is non-progressive up to the point that the bar resists as it nears it's compliance. His opinion of the bar having plenty of twist within the 7.5" travel is noted, though in real life testing, I and others have discovered otherwise.
Example....take a garden hose who'se material is consistent and non-progressive...lay it out...then pull on it on both ends. It'll stretch for a bit, though for only so far. Then, it gets harder and harder to stretch and at some point it either stops stretching or it breaks.
Recent posts speak of some comparisons between OEM and OME bars. Yes, the ride is stiffer with the stiffer OME bars. Higher rate.
My comments come from various lift heights with the same high-rate bars:
At 2"...my ride was near stock, though with improved handling. F&R flexed pretty-much like stock. Tha last little bit took more force to stuff the wheel.
At 2.75"...my ride was near stock on the mild bumps and stiffer on the big ones. Front flex was good and smooth through the first half of up-travel. The last bit though takes a lot more force and rarely did the wheel ever bottom out. It's hard to believe that another 0.75" would make a diff but it does on my truck.
Adding the N74L shocks helps this "problem" as the added rear pressure on the rear wheel when flexed helped to put added pressure on the opposing front. This helped F&R in the articulation dept.