VtaTom
SILVER Star
I've been through the "what tire is best" threads but I wanted to ask if anyone has any reason why I shouldn't put on Yokohama Geolanders in stock size. It's my cheapest option because I'm running an unused geolander as my spare but I don't want to be stuck with a bad choice. Reviews seem solid but wondering if anyone has run these on their 100 series in rain, snow etc.
My two main options are:
4 new Michelins.
3 new Geolanders w a Nexen spare for a month or two.
Mostly I'm driving on paved roads or forest roads.
I was hoping to get 1-2 more years out of the Nexen HTs on when I bought it three years ago but my fronts are worn out. (The backs were new but the fronts were almost new when I got it.)
My plan was to switch to AT tires when I got around to lifting and bumpers, etc. towards an expedition setup for the desert and the Sierras. So I could run Geolanders for a few years and switch to 285 (BFG or whatever) later on.
Except for a cargo barrier I'm running bone stock.
I'd appreciate any confirmation or warning since I'm getting them Saturday.
My two main options are:
4 new Michelins.
3 new Geolanders w a Nexen spare for a month or two.
Mostly I'm driving on paved roads or forest roads.
I was hoping to get 1-2 more years out of the Nexen HTs on when I bought it three years ago but my fronts are worn out. (The backs were new but the fronts were almost new when I got it.)
My plan was to switch to AT tires when I got around to lifting and bumpers, etc. towards an expedition setup for the desert and the Sierras. So I could run Geolanders for a few years and switch to 285 (BFG or whatever) later on.
Except for a cargo barrier I'm running bone stock.
I'd appreciate any confirmation or warning since I'm getting them Saturday.