sleepycruiser
I will get by….I will survive -Touch of Grey LC200
So I found another GX that I am trying to go look at this week. Ad states the mileage is 167k. It is a 2004. When I pull up the history on the Carfax and the Lexus website it shows the mileage at 81k in 06/011, 201k in 11/2015 and then 205k in 12/2015, and then 118k in 02/2016. The 81k and the 118k were put in by The same dealership and the 201k and 205k were put in by a different dealership. Both are large Lexus dealerships. Carfax also shows 97k in 4/2013. Thoughts? If the 201k and 205k are typos then that means it was only driven a few thousand miles from 2013 to 2016...which is also weird.
Carfax also shows ‘Functional damage’ from a rear collision. No airbags deployed. Bad?
The seller has owned it since 2009 according to Carfax and has no idea about the mileage discrepancy.
The Carfax also shows 2 different dealers reporting on it on maintenance dates....which I have never seen before.
Carfax also shows ‘Functional damage’ from a rear collision. No airbags deployed. Bad?
The seller has owned it since 2009 according to Carfax and has no idea about the mileage discrepancy.
The Carfax also shows 2 different dealers reporting on it on maintenance dates....which I have never seen before.