KO2 vs Toyo MT Mileage Data

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
May 16, 2008
Threads
31
Messages
360
Location
Longmont, CO
Plot Spoiler: 17% improvement in mileage.

I had my set of Toyo MTs (315/75R16) for just over 6 six years. They were bulletproof and stayed balanced for the duration. I put over 40,000 miles on them and they still were at 13-14 across the board.

But they were hideous on mileage. Great for brakes and while that sounds like a joke, it isn't. I could take my foot out of the gas and go from 50 down 25 quickly without touching the brakes.

I had had BFG KO in the 285 variety (33s) with stock gearing. Once I went to 488s I went to the 35s and the Toyo MTs.

Here is the data:

1) I took years of data and consistently would get no better than 14.7 MEASURED with the Ultragauge. This ended up being pretty accurate if you multiplied that by 0.93 (the effective factor considering I am still over-geared about 7% with the 488s and 35s). I would get as low as 13.9 if the tank included a lot of snowy, slow heavier air driving during winter. But during the summer with a typical tank of driving my commute and some town driving, I got darn close to that 14.7. For years.

1a) That 14.7 is really 13.6 mpg which strongly correlated with the amount of gas I would put in and the miles driven.

1b) I would get between 245 and 285 miles indicated per tank with the Toyo MTs.

2) I now have three full tanks of gas and 1000 miles of driving. I'm consistently getting at 17.2 indicated. Now I have my ARB awning attached and I'm guessing that is actually hindering the measurement by something significant, maybe 0.3 mpg but it's worth noting.

2a) That 17.2 works out to about 16 mpg which is also strongly correlated with the amount of gas I put in the tank. See my attached image.

2b) I'm pretty consistently getting 325 miles from a tank and got 350 on one but she took 20+ gallons to fill thereafter so still pretty consistent.

Notes and opinions:

A) I drive with an eye to mileage. Some don't I do. But my driving does include dropping out of overdrive and dropping into 2nd a fair amount. I do live in Colorado and this heavy pig needs to spin to get up hills without being the Pariah Of The Highway.

B) I did NOT like the way the MTs handled offroad. I would drop the PSI down 14 and even with my heavily armored rig, the tires barely deflect. They were stiff when I got them and got worse over time. I was taken aback by how poorly they behaved vs the KOs I had previously and I'm nearly certain it is because these extremely strong MTs just don't move.

C) The KO2s I have now I think are ideally suited for the west. There just isn't mud out here. We have plenty rock and sandstone but I've driven 1000s of miles of dirt and can only think of a couple areas with anything that could be considered real mud. We just do not need MTs out here. I saw a buggy with Toyo MTs and beadlocks aired down to 2 psi and those things looked perfect. He liked them cuz he could air down so far and the sidewalls were so bulletproof. But short of that, I just don't think these MTs are good for out west. The KO2s have so much better siping for winter and a much better tire for out here.

IMG_2394.webp
 
Last edited:
Very interesting analysis. What is even more interesting is that you apparently averaged factory freeway mileage of a brand new 97 on oversized tires and overloaded rig. And by switching to KO2's you're somehow making even better fuel mileage than a factory 97 was rated for on the freeway. I don't know which year you have so I'm using the one with the best fuel economy for comparison. You're in the mixed driving mpg's for a diesel cruiser. Pretty impressive. On 33's, bone stock with a yellowbox speed recalibrator, and with a full tune up and a clean bill of health I could only ever manage 13 freeway 11 mixed with my 93.
 
My personal experience with BFGs is limited to the original Radial All-Terrains and the various iterations of the BFG Radial Mud Terrains through the KM2. I do know that the KO was sold as a fleet tire for light trucks on the basis of, among other things, its good mileage performance. BFG seems to inject some kind of special mojo in each of these model tires.

Back when I worked in the corporate garage, employees could get work done at shop rates and parts pricing. Our president brought in his Suburban, complaining about the tires. I don't recall exactly what other than short tread life of whatever he was running previously. We put the KOs on after he chose them based on several options we offered to him and never heard another peep from him on that. And he was the sort to let you know if there was an issue with his ride (a good fellow, too, don't want to cast that as anything other than being a bit OCD on such matters as many of us are.)

Too much mud in my trail selection to run the KO, but for dry country wheeling I would agree they're definitely worth consideration.
 
I dig KO2s because they've been pretty good for everything I've thrown at them. Snow, ice, mud, hard pack, freeway miles, etc. Just a good solid set of tires for an 80.

I should add that I don't spend tons of time in mud; it makes up <5% of my offroading world.
 
i will buy more KO2's when i wear out my current set. 14.5'ish mpg on 285's with mostly highway and a little city driving. have a yellowbox converter. they are amazing in several inches of NYC slush. just had to rebalance at 20k miles in.
 
I put a set of 34 X 10.5 17 on my wife's 80 and can tell you that this truck has never felt so good with several different sets of tires on it. I've had BFGs for years, best set yet for sure.
 
I'm having a hard time wearing out my original KO's. I really have zero issues in moving right into KO2's. Best wearing tire I've ever used.
 
I recently spoke with a Tire guy (puts them on for a living) and he said that tires are now made with a progressive compound.
They are very soft on the outside and progressively harder as tire wears. This is how they can guarantee them to 90K miles.

He said that they are so hard that you can nearly drive them forever once the soft tread is gone but they will suck for grip ie useless in rain.
Tires main purpose is to supply grip between powertrain & ground.
 
Last edited:
Have you been able to measure the OD of the KO2's? My last set of KM2 were surprisingly under sized compared to the same size Toyo MT. Makes sense you'd be getting better fuel efficiency. The weight delta between the tires are ~15-20 lbs I believe.
 
I love this write-up, it matches so well with what I've recently experienced.

For a long time, I had 285 BFG KOs, ARB front bumper, no winch, stock gearing, 2.5" OME. For two years I averaged 14.6 per tank on my 78 mile round trip for work every day. A few weeks ago I added 4x4Labs rear with swing out, 4" Dobinsons flexi coils, and 37x12.50 BFG KO2s. My new average is 14.2, however, on way out to the OBX this week, over two tanks of gas and 8 hours, I averaged 16.1 loaded down with gear. I know it's average vs highway, but I'm still amazed at these new KO2s. Very little difference in average mpg considering the weight added, but still really easy DD duties with 37s. Yes, it's definitely slower acceleration on stock gears, but I have a brand new '17 Mustang GT for that.

I got 80k miles on the original 285s I took off, and they still have enough tread to sell on Craigslist. If the new set can match that, it'll be $ well spent considering what they can do in 99% of the situations I'll encounter.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom