TLCA Thoughts 2008
Wow, what an interesting and timely thread. Once again my hat is off to Kowboy for stirring the pot. IMO, this was long overdue but, owing to my ‘unique’ situation, I am just not as comfortable putting all my cards on the table when it comes to opining on TLCA and it’s future.
Like Green Lantern, I have no beef with anyone or anything that’s been said here, and y’all are welcome at my campfires anytime. As for the beer, if’n you don’t like what I got, BYO! And after 20 years in the TLCA, Erik, trust me, I know you feel!
I think that it’s gotten to the point where there’s just so many new people on board any more that don’t know how we’ve gotten to where we are, that we should have a mission statement that explains exactly that, AND OFFER EVERY NEW BOD from here on out the chance to re-write that mission statement. SO in all fairness, even though every one of these subjects has been hashed out DOZENS of times before, for TLCA to remain relevant to those who are going to man the helm for the next two years, THEY need to hear and read the arguments today and PARTICIPATE in forming the conclusions and decisions that will shape the organization for tomorrow.
DISCLAIMER: while I wholeheartedly approve of having this discussion, I think that it is unfortunate that it will NOT be a comprehensive one for the simple reason that it is taking place on a public forum, and that a full and frank assessment of our strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement will HAVE TO INCLUDE financial information that is NOT APPROPRIATE for publication in a public forum.
1. Toyota Trails. I think that Alan posted an e-mail to BODreps a couple of years back that very succinctly stated his view, and the view of many that TT was the number one reason for people staying in the TLCA. It’s sad, but probably true. Would cutting it back, changing it’s format, or eliminating it in favor of exclusive web-based content cut our ranks? Probably. Drastically? Maybe. Does the BOD have the right to revisit this decision, take this chance, or any other one? ABSOLUTELY. Debate it and issue a written decision. Those who don’t like it are free to leave.
Is this the only issue regarding TT? No. Are there lower costs alternatives to the our current publishing arrangement we just don’t know about? Possibly. Would Todd [or anyone else on the BOD] mind knowing about lower cost alternatives? ABSOLUTELY NOT! Is it possible that in the face of diminishing print media opportunities, the available printing houses [if that’s what you call them] might be more flexible on minimum quantities NOW vs. LAST YEAR or two years ago. Maybe. Definitely worth investigating. Maybe if we offered someone a ‘finders’ fee to find us a more competitive deal, we’d get some answers real quick. Hmmm.
[If you digest search BODreps, you will see that this issue WAS addressed at length last year, and Todd very rationally explained ‘the numbers’ and that we really had a sweetheart of deal with our print house based on our relatively small size] I wonder what Zartman’s printing costs are?
Of course the other half of the cost of TT is in the layout. Could TT content be organized for less than what we’re paying Todd and his assistant? I don’t know. The last BOD certainly didn’t seem to mind going thru a few different Webmasters in search of ‘value’. I have no beef with the quality Todd’s work, but I wouldn’t pretend to know if it is competitively priced in the marketplace. Is this discussion off limits? I hope not. CAVEAT. Todd is not an outsider; he is one of us. If you feel it is appropriate to discuss his compensation publicly, please keep that in mind. Same with Jenn.
BOTH preceding discussion items have the potential to save a substantial amount of money without changing the quality of our TT.
2. RUBITHON. I agree with Kowboy that nothing should be beyond the review of the BOD, and I don’t think Rubithon is. Rather, I think that the BOD’s approach [mis-perceived by some as hands-off] is more like ‘If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.’ On this subject, I do feel qualified to speak. I participated in all 5 of the first Rubithons, as well as 3 more of the last 5. I have had the opportunity to witness the strengths and weaknesses of this event. IMO, Rubithon SHOULD be put on the table: to figure out how to replicate it’s enormous success for two or three more national events!
I think it would be interesting for the BOD for 2009 to pick ONE [any one really, I have no preference] of the other current TLCA sanctioned events and politely ask the sponsoring club to consider making it a national event. Find out what the club has to say about it.
Obviously from the TLCA’s side of things, it would be a lot easier than starting another event from scratch. More importantly though, articulating to a local club why it should consider making the commitment to TLCA that Rubithon has would be an excellent exercise in defining why we should even have a TLCA.
As far as TLCA support of sanctioned events, Roger started a good discussion on this last year on our MUD bodreps forum, but the current administration did not consider it cost effective. That does not mean a new BOD cannot revisit the issue. IMO, I like Kowboy’s idea of donating some big ticket item like a winch to EVERY sanctioned event. I consider it ironic that the same bean counters that say we can’t afford it completely overlook the element of goodwill [at the same time they’re pimping it to the Associate members!] Insert shaking head emoticon here.
3. The Administrator. Again, I agree with Kowboy that NOTHING deserves to be beyond discussion, and to be revisited whenever the membership deems it appropriate. Election time certainly seems like an appropriate time.
That said, from everything I’ve read and heard about the string of administrators that preceded Jenn, she has far surpassed them all. While it IS a paid position, it is IMO the single most thankless position in this organization. I personally would not have put up with half the CRAP Jenn has put up with for what she’s paid. Her job description seems to change on a regular basis, and she’s expected to have undertaken her new tasks retroactively [according to those who have a beef with her].
Is she perfect? I doubt it. Could she do a better job for us? Not unless AND until the membership can articulate what it is they expect AND she has an appropriate opportunity to consider whether it is worth adding to her job description for what she is paid.
And FWIW, I wholeheartedly disagree with Kowboy’s 9-5 thing. I will take quality over quantity any day. I’ll agree that Jenn gives us some really weird hours at times, but the fact of the matter is that she pretty much has done everything that has been asked of her, and usually within a reasonable amount of time. On this front, I really don’t think we’re gonna get any more bang for our buck elsewhere.
Respectfully submitted,
Mark Algazy, TLCA member #1086