Its not as bad as it looks, there is a section in the middle that does not have threads and is tapered I can only amuse to keep you from over tightening it.
I don't know if 'stretch bolts' were in vogue already when this engine was built, but, if that were a stretch bolt, which often have a tapered section with some engineered weakness built in, the objective is for the bolt to have a spring-like tension.
Typically these are supposed to be thrown away after removal and replaced with new bolts.
Over in the VW community there is an unfortunate cult of stretch bolts. Any number of different bits of hardware here and there are referred to as stretch bolts that probably aren't. Often, VW or Bentley will recommend new bolts for an R&R just on principle, is my perception, but this is not to say that the bolts were designed as stretch bolts or that they were torqued to such tension that they are likely to have stretched.
So, there are innumerable online vendors that sell maintenance kits, and invariably one or two of them will bundle all new bolts and claim that they are stretch bolts and should be replaced. This makes people feel extra responsible when performing their own maintenance and makes the vendor a few extra bucks. And then the rest of the vendors end up following suit.
It's stupid.
The first time i changed the timing belt on my Mk4 1.8T, the Internet Wisdom was that i should replace all three motor mount bolts as they are stretch bolts.
I bought my parts from a good local vendor who did not have any motor mount bolts.
So i went to the dealership, where the parts guy explained that they had never ordered a set. Because they reuse them 100% of the time. Because they are perfectly normal cadmium plated shoulder bolts.
That belt was at 35,000 miles (water pump failed) and i put three more belts on it using those same motor mount bolts every time, over the course of more than 100,000 miles, before someone ran their subaru into me on I15.
Below is a photo of the four subframe cradle bolts from a Mk5 Golf / Jetta / GTI / GLI chassy. The weird ones are stretch bolts, and you can see where the upper one has been visibly stretched. Exactly where it is supposed to stretch.
This design, fwiw, is a bunch of nonsense. The subframe cradle was designed with a significant amount of side to side play for some reason (ease of assembly maybe? Just sort it out when you do the front end alignment?), and the stretch bolts (torqued to 54 ft/lb) are an abject failure at keeping it from shifting around on hard cornering.
The B6 Passat has the same subframe cradle, same bolts, and same problem. There is a VW TSB specifying that drivers complaining of this issue should have installed a kit containing some spacers with grippy spots on them between cradle and frame, and some regular shoulder bolts, torqued a bit harder.
That also does not work.
At this point i have a very expensive kit to install that includes four CNC milled bronze bushings that eliminate the subframe cradle play and two ARP M12 shoulder bolts.