Slow Paddler
SILVER Star
Today I drove a "new" (640 miles) one owner 2019 base LC200. I figure if I'm going to get one before the new ones are gone, now's the time. This was the only one around to test out. I'm currently in a 2016 4Runner Trail Premium w/KDSS, with KO2s and a roof rack. So slightly noisier than stock. My last drive in a Land Cruiser was a new 40 in 1977, and I've wanted one since. (The dealer wouldn't even evaluate my trade at the time, as my brakes went out on my Scirocco on the way there...)
The (Ford) dealer was awesome, giving us the keys and leaving us alone. We spent probably 45 minutes in and around it looking at the features, trying the seats, fiddling with buttons and screens, etc. Having the 4Runner, most of it was familiar, and I knew that it is old technology. Then we took it for a drive of mixed rural and Interstate for 20-30 miles, then back to sit in it longer to talk and get a feel for it. I'm picky with my seating, as my back gets tired and sore quickly in most vehicles. All told, we were in it close to 90 minutes.
Driving was different than I expected. I'd heard of the heavy steering, but it felt lighter than my 4Runner, so that was good. It was quieter than my 4Runner, but not as quiet as I thought it would be. I guess I expected luxury sedan silence, but that's not going to happen with a brick on frame vehicle. Road feel while driving was great, giving me a comfortable but not numb ride, and steering that felt more precise than I expected.
I'm 5' 8" on a good day, with short legs (28-30"inseam.) The lowest seat height on my 4Runner is quite a bit lower than the lowest on the LC. I'm in more of a sedan type feet out in front of me in the 4Runner, and more feet down like in a van in the LC. Probably something I could get used to, but it felt like a kid sitting at the big table. The seat is much stiffer and full compared to the 4Runner, too. The 4Runner is more concave like a sport seat.
Getting back in the 4Runner and driving the 90 minutes home was a mixed bag. It was suddenly noisy and jarring again, and a more confined cockpit. But the seats in the 4Runner gelt great after the LC. Sure they are more broken in, but I only have 34k on the 4Runner, so a long way from broken down.
And, just like the rest of the electronics, both have crappy audio. I was disappointed in the JBL system, and Deb wasn't far off when she said it sounded like the stereo in her 1977 Camaro 40 years ago.
We've got some pondering to do. I haven't quite convinced Deb that technically, a new LC200 would cost us only $150. I put $150 into an AAPL piggy back back in 1993, and can break it open and pull out a new LC today. She doesn't see it that way...
Anyway, those are my observations of a first drive. No questions; simply thinking out loud, as it were.
BTW, I couldn't figure out why a barely used Land Cruiser ended up in a Ford used car lot in pretty rural Ohio. That is, until I walked in the showroom and realized I was in a toy shop. It was filled with Porsches, Ferarris, Lamborghini, Bentley Continental GTs, Audi R8s, Vipers, custom Jaguar, etc. The LC was the cheap car in this place!
The (Ford) dealer was awesome, giving us the keys and leaving us alone. We spent probably 45 minutes in and around it looking at the features, trying the seats, fiddling with buttons and screens, etc. Having the 4Runner, most of it was familiar, and I knew that it is old technology. Then we took it for a drive of mixed rural and Interstate for 20-30 miles, then back to sit in it longer to talk and get a feel for it. I'm picky with my seating, as my back gets tired and sore quickly in most vehicles. All told, we were in it close to 90 minutes.
Driving was different than I expected. I'd heard of the heavy steering, but it felt lighter than my 4Runner, so that was good. It was quieter than my 4Runner, but not as quiet as I thought it would be. I guess I expected luxury sedan silence, but that's not going to happen with a brick on frame vehicle. Road feel while driving was great, giving me a comfortable but not numb ride, and steering that felt more precise than I expected.
I'm 5' 8" on a good day, with short legs (28-30"inseam.) The lowest seat height on my 4Runner is quite a bit lower than the lowest on the LC. I'm in more of a sedan type feet out in front of me in the 4Runner, and more feet down like in a van in the LC. Probably something I could get used to, but it felt like a kid sitting at the big table. The seat is much stiffer and full compared to the 4Runner, too. The 4Runner is more concave like a sport seat.
Getting back in the 4Runner and driving the 90 minutes home was a mixed bag. It was suddenly noisy and jarring again, and a more confined cockpit. But the seats in the 4Runner gelt great after the LC. Sure they are more broken in, but I only have 34k on the 4Runner, so a long way from broken down.
And, just like the rest of the electronics, both have crappy audio. I was disappointed in the JBL system, and Deb wasn't far off when she said it sounded like the stereo in her 1977 Camaro 40 years ago.
We've got some pondering to do. I haven't quite convinced Deb that technically, a new LC200 would cost us only $150. I put $150 into an AAPL piggy back back in 1993, and can break it open and pull out a new LC today. She doesn't see it that way...
Anyway, those are my observations of a first drive. No questions; simply thinking out loud, as it were.
BTW, I couldn't figure out why a barely used Land Cruiser ended up in a Ford used car lot in pretty rural Ohio. That is, until I walked in the showroom and realized I was in a toy shop. It was filled with Porsches, Ferarris, Lamborghini, Bentley Continental GTs, Audi R8s, Vipers, custom Jaguar, etc. The LC was the cheap car in this place!
Last edited: