if you raised your child right, they would never do such a thing., such as trading it in for a used 250Prado.![]()
If you raised them right, and they still did, that behavior should lead to disowning.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
if you raised your child right, they would never do such a thing., such as trading it in for a used 250Prado.![]()
The only 200 series I got to drive when I was 16 was a $200 Ford Tempo.There is only one appropriate vehicle for a teenager's first car, and it doesn't matter whether the teen turns 16 today or in 2055... the vehicle is always a 1999 Civic.
First cars are always disrespected, raced, beat to s***, unmaintained, with unmentionable things happening both inside and outside (sometimes simultaneously). A 200 series is way, way, waaaay too much for a first car. The 200 will also set unrealistic expectations for future vehicles.
Kids got to start on the low end of the vehicle spectrum. Cheap, economical, slow as hell, reliable, and borderline disposable. Work their way up from there using their own money. Give em something to aspire to, and a sense of achievement & progress when they upgrade. If the 200 series is not needed, sell it and put the cash away into a guaranteed investment vehicle, then gift it to the kid when they are older, wiser, and have achieved something in life.
wow that was pricier than my 1981 Subaru DL Wagon that was bought in exchange for a 6 pack.The only 200 series I got to drive when I was 16 was a $200 Ford Tempo.
Safety and reliability are good main concerns, but also factor in money. Considering gas, insurance, maintenance and the occasional repair, a 12 year old LC could be quite a financial burden for a young guy just starting out in life. I’m glad my 2 sons started out with a used Honda CR-V and a used Honda Civic respectively. Those vehicles didn’t hold my sons (or me) hostage to high fixed and operating costs. I still miss my 80 and my 100, but I think it was a good decision to sell them rather than pass them along to young budgets. And of course I’ll make arrangements to be buried in my 200.Okay, I realize this is sort of a loaded question, or really just a way to justify to myself that I'm making the right choice.
So I think I've decided to move on to the dark side (well, not really dark side, since I'm still staying in the Toyota family), and have been kicking tires to get an LX 600 F-Sport in the next couple months or so. I would absolutely get a LC 300 if they brought them to the US, but that's not an option, and I really kind of hate the new LC, so the LX it is. Believe it or not, I actually think the F-Sport looks pretty sweet with the right wheels and tires...but that's beside the point. My real question is what to do with my 2013 LC. I really don't want to get rid of it, so my wife and I were discussing giving it to my son when he turns 16. I had originally considered letting him drive it before, but then I started thinking about how bad the gas mileage is (for a teenager), how large it is to drive, and is it really an appropriate vehicle for a teenager...meaning is it just "too much." We had thought about getting him a used Tacoma or 4Runner, but dang, no shocker, but the prices on those are crazy high. So he's now been driving for a few months now, and has surprised me with how well he drives, so it kind of brought me back to thinking that maybe the LC would be a good option after all. My two main concerns are safety and reliability, and of course we have two check marks there, and he doesn't seem too bothered by the size, but I guess I'm having a little hang up about giving a kid what was originally a $70,000 car...and yes, I realize it's old and not worth anything close to that now, but it's still something I think about.
So I guess I'm really looking for your thoughts and opinions on what I should do here. Anyone of you in a similar boat or done the same thing? If you think I'm being stupid for doing this, or even just overthinking it, let me know...I promise you won't offend me!![]()
The best thing about Subaru ownership and 200 ownership is both need HG replacement. I have been teaching my kids the HG replacement, so they will be ready.We got our kid an old Subaru when she came of age for driving.
200 insurance is dirt cheap and with gas prices - means your teenager will not go anywhereThe gas and insurance on a 200 would be crushing.
The right answer is some generic four door, fully depreciated, that gets 35 mpg and has a bunch of airbags in it. Insurance will be cheap, gas will be cheap. And it will probably last long enough they mishaps to bridge to the next.
Compared to a newer Outback, Corolla, or anything modern an LC200 is not ‘safe’. Safety systems on a 2013 are ancient compared to anything newer. The brakes are nowhere near as a good as a lighter car. I have driven Land Cruisers for 40 years and would not choose one for a kids first car (at least in an urban or high speed driving environment). I bought mine a new Subaru Crosstrek and a new Mazda CX5. I am the first to understand that not everyone can afford new cars for their kids but anything built in the last 10 years will be better for a young driver than a LC200, IMHO.You already own it and it’s incredibly safe. Plus more $ for gas is less $ he can spend on drugs and booze.
We bought a ‘97 Legacy for her in 2014, when she was 16. I finally sold it last year. It was a great car, never needed anything besides brakes and a starter. Of course, we don’t drive a helluva lot of miles around here.The best thing about Subaru ownership and 200 ownership is both need HG replacement. I have been teaching my kids the HG replacement, so they will be ready.
guess my kids will be dead then in their unsafe vehiclesCompared to a newer Outback, Corolla, or anything modern an LC200 is not ‘safe’. Safety systems on a 2013 are ancient compared to anything newer. The brakes are nowhere near as a good as a lighter car. I have driven Land Cruisers for 40 years and would not choose one for a kids first car. I bought them a new Subaru Crosstrek and a new Mazda CX5. I am the first to understand that not everyone can afford new cars for their kids but anything built in the last 10 years will be better for a young driver than a LC200, IMHO.
See? I knew I'd eventually get a logical suggestion on here. Ferrari it is!get your kid an Escalade or Ferrari.