I've don't recall seeing THIS aspect of castor/alignment covered before so here we go. When my OME was installed with CC the alignment report said I was at 3 deg. pos. It drove fine and still does. I had the alignment checked because of crazy tire wear recently and everything was fine, except the castor was now closer to 0. At the time I attributed it to sag.
Then tonight I had a kind of revelation while sitting in a meeting. How could my castor had become less positive if the springs were sagging a little bit?
I looked at some old pictures, and went out and snapped a picture. Accounting for tire wear a little bit, the profile views look the just about the same with respect to "amount of coil" visible on the front end. Even with tire wear, and the addition of slee sliders.
I had a thought cross my mind tonight about how to measure castor. I've seen the alignment ramp type lift at the shop, am I correct to assume that the ramps and table are level? I understand the concept of positive and negative castor. If castor is measured at the centerline of the axle, do they use the flat surface or the bolts on top of the knuckle as the centerline/level line of the axle. Is this surface perp to the driveshaft?
If all of my assumptions are true, then the higher the back of the truck is at the time of measurement, then the less positive and or more negative the castor reading would be.
Am I rationalizing this correctly?
I've read about alot of strange Castor readings in the past with different lifts. CC bushing are installed and folks Castor readings are all over the board. It seems like if my theory is how they measure castor is correct, then different weights on the same lift would vary drastically with respect to the castor reading. By the way, my rig does seem like it tracks slightly straighter with a little weight in the back.
PS I don't have an armored rear bumper.
Then tonight I had a kind of revelation while sitting in a meeting. How could my castor had become less positive if the springs were sagging a little bit?
I looked at some old pictures, and went out and snapped a picture. Accounting for tire wear a little bit, the profile views look the just about the same with respect to "amount of coil" visible on the front end. Even with tire wear, and the addition of slee sliders.
I had a thought cross my mind tonight about how to measure castor. I've seen the alignment ramp type lift at the shop, am I correct to assume that the ramps and table are level? I understand the concept of positive and negative castor. If castor is measured at the centerline of the axle, do they use the flat surface or the bolts on top of the knuckle as the centerline/level line of the axle. Is this surface perp to the driveshaft?
If all of my assumptions are true, then the higher the back of the truck is at the time of measurement, then the less positive and or more negative the castor reading would be.
Am I rationalizing this correctly?
I've read about alot of strange Castor readings in the past with different lifts. CC bushing are installed and folks Castor readings are all over the board. It seems like if my theory is how they measure castor is correct, then different weights on the same lift would vary drastically with respect to the castor reading. By the way, my rig does seem like it tracks slightly straighter with a little weight in the back.
PS I don't have an armored rear bumper.