They have quite a bit different offset from the stock 18s and will make WORSE tire clearance.
I'm on stock 18s (2011 6-spoke) and running 265/70r
18 tires (Defenders). There is a tiny bit of rubbing only when backing AND turning. I could eliminate it with a bit more heat gun massaging, but it's so minor I don't care. I have zero lift, zero chopping, zero hacking. Some minor heat gun work and honestly it didn't do much.
IMO the perfect "everything else stock" tire size is 255/70r18. On every generation of GX to my knowledge this will clear with no rubbing and it's 32" tall.
When I looked into dropping down to 17s on TRD wheels, I decided it wasn't worth it. Here's why:
- TRD wheels with their wider stance (less positive offset) actually reduce tire clearance by increasing scrub radius. Stock 18s are +25mm offset wheels while the TRDs are only +4mm. That means you will shift the wheel out nearly an inch just swapping to the 17s. This is why I have no body mount rub with 32.5" tires while many running smaller tires have had to chop the body mount. If you want maximum possible tire clearance, you need to stay with the stock +25mm offset or VERY close to it. With 265/70r18s, I still have a good bit of clearance (about 3/4") to the UCA.
- I personally wanted to run the I could fit with no chopping whatsoever. So my first inclination was to do a 235/80r17 E rated tire. Most of these are right at 32" or just under. They are nice and narrow. But they are HEAVY because they are E-rated. The AT4w in this size is 47# per tire! Not only are E-rated tires porky overweight, but because they are rock hard they tend to really suck off-road with airing down making almost no difference. There are no 235 wide tall AT tires that are NOT E-rated, so I would have had to step to a 245 wide tire. The problem is that the 245 width in a 75 series is *also* e-rated, so you have to drop down to a 245/70 to get out of porky 50#-per-tire range. Unfortunately, the 245/70r17 is only 30.5" tall, which is what my bone stock 18s are. So after all that fiddling with 17s, I ended up gaining no height and only losing a tiny bit of width.
- Why would I spend money in TRDs and be limited to a 245/70r17 in a non-E-rated tire when the stock 18s will let me run a 255/70r18 which is still narrower than stock 265 while being nearly 2" taller?
- If you look at the total number of sizes offered, 18" is now more popular than 17". Yes, a 17 gets more you more sidewall, and that's really nice to have. But it's only 1/2" more than an 18, and I was able to get the same increase in sidewall by going taller on 18s.
If I was willing to do an E-rated tire, I would have absolutely considered the 17s and going with 255/80r17. This is sort of the ultimate pizza cutter. It is a legit full 33" tire and only 255 wide and on T4R TRDORP wheels (the 7spoke "gear" wheels) it fits with no BMC.
But in the end, I figured the 17s still weren't worth it to gain merely a 1/2" taller tire that is 10# heavier.
By staying with stock wheels and going with 265/70r18 Defender MS2s, I got a 32.5" tall tire that fits with no lift or chop and the most minor of minor rubs. And the tires themselves are lightweight at only 40# each (compared to 56# each for the E-rated variant!). The ride quality is fantastic, they are super quiet and I can get 20mpg highway with these large tires.
I couldn't possibly be happier with my choice in tires and what staying with the stock wheels got me.
View attachment 3897369
Nothing impressive, but with this amount of flex I had ZERO rub:
View attachment 3897371