- Thread starter
- #81
Cool, the multi-matic units are nice
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Did you tune it yourself or take it somewhere?Hahaha! Actually that’s pretty cool. What did you get?
I’m running an old (probably early 2000’s) Miller Synchrowave 250. But it’s tuned up good and runs great on DC, plus the water cooled torch makes a HUGE difference
Did you tune it yourself or take it somewhere?
Do you do much to keep it in tune?
My sits as is did from the auction. I’ve checked a few things but never adjusted anything.
I figure my limiting factor is dipping my tungsten.
My miller w250 torch looks similiar. I’ve never known anything different.The only thing I've really found with those tig welders need is an occasional point adjustment if starts start to get hard.
The most helpful thing I have found to improve weld quality is a solid, nice torch and good consumables. I run a CK 20 water cooled on mine. So much lighter and it fits in so many places so much better. I also run a tig button for AC and really weird spots. They has been a super nice upgrade for cages and having to shove my head in places or run on my back.
I think it starts fine. Points look good.Yeah, @DangerNoodle is right, when I say “tuned” the points is the big thing, and using good consumables. I also think in addition to hard starts, that the arc gets a bit unsteady/unstable if the points need work. The machine I’m using sat for years, and the points needed a serious cleaning
Would LOVE a torch with the push button start for cage work or being horrible contorted somewhere but that’s not in the cards quite yet.
@Ditcherman, have you tried running a gas lens on your setup? It won’t help keep the tungsten out of the puddle but they make a big difference in gas diffusion and how “clean” your weld looks afterwards.
I usually buy most of my torch consumables from Jamie’s Weldmonger store. This is a very basic cup and gas lens set, think I’m running a #7 glass lens currently: WELDMONGER® Furick Jazzy #10 Combo Kit - For 17/18/26 Style Torches - https://weldmongerstore.com/collections/gas-lens-kits-and-accessories/products/furick-10-ck-worldwide-combo-kit-for-17-18-26-style-torches
Hi pinion ride on the drive side of the gear like a rear does, the convex side like the last pic. Pinion looks a little deep to me.Couldn’t leave well enough alone. Pulled another 2 thousandths out of the pinion depth, this looks good. If I’m understanding reverse rotation the “drive” side of the ring is the concave side. Now it’s time to pull it all back apart and replace the setup bearings
View attachment 3848850
View attachment 3848849
Convex side? Ok. I guess I thought since it was reversed it’d be opposite.Hi pinion ride on the drive side of the gear like a rear does, the convex side like the last pic. Pinion looks a little deep to me.
Are the OD of the bearing races the same? I have seen different pitch and number of rollers over the years but the OD of the race was the same. Are you putting shims under the inner race? or under the pinion bearing? 60's can be a pain. Once you get all that, you have to shim the outer pinion for bearing preload.... All axles are different. I just finished setting up two sets of 80 series gears with E-lockers. All had different shim packs.
After thinking about it, in a front application it would ride on the drive side of the gear. In a rear, it would be the coast side, unless you are using special gears like in a High Nine or maybe a Gearworks, where the gear is made different to be in the rear and ride on the drive side. So I guess if they are stock gears then the concave side would be the drive side. Sorry for any confusion.Convex side? Ok. I guess I thought since it was reversed it’d be opposite.
Yes, on the upper pinion bearing, the OD of both the outer race and bearing is much larger than a standard 60 and I guess that’s a Teraflex mod or strength improvement. I could take some quick measurements once my setup bearings come out.
Pinion depth shims go under the lower pinion bearing just like a normal 60 and it’s currently set with the bearing preload correct, just everything with setup bearings. I’ll have to verify everything again once the new earrings go in.
And I completely agree, all these axles are different to some degree, this Teraflex is just REALLY been different when it comes to shimming it
Ok, we are on the same page. It’s goofy trying to keep track of whether it’s in the front axle or the rear. I’ve second guessed myself repeatedly. From what I understand, that’s why no OEM uses a high pinion rear since the drive force is applied to the coast side which is something like 30% weaker. But in a D60 under a relatively light rig it should be fineAfter thinking about it, in a front application it would ride on the drive side of the gear. In a rear, it would be the coast side, unless you are using special gears like in a High Nine or maybe a Gearworks, where the gear is made different to be in the rear and ride on the drive side. So I guess if they are stock gears then the concave side would be the drive side. Sorry for any confusion.
That is a crazy housing set up. think I will stick with a stock hp housing....Another TeraFlex oddity, the threaded pinion seal retainer. This is why I needed a really large adjustable spanner to torque it
View attachment 3852724
Retainer, pinion seal and forged 1410 yoke are in, just not torqued yet. Couple more things down tho
View attachment 3852725