- Thread starter
- #101
I've found this page: http://www.4x4review.com/tech/fj80-3Link.asp
That's more or lesso what I wanted to do.
Francesco
That's more or lesso what I wanted to do.
Francesco
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Here I am again, this time with some good news and bad news...let's start with the good one!
The car is almost complete: the weldings are done, I've got only the last things to do (rear bumpstops, silencer etc.) but the car is already able to run.
These are some pics from a little test I did in the garden of my house; the first three are about the rear axle; as you can see it has a good ride and I can see that the work came out fine (the ride of the shocks is about 33 cm/13": is 4,5 cm fully compressed and 38 cm fully extended):
![]()
![]()
![]()
And now the bad news: the front axle is quite stationary; the ride of the front shocks is less than 15 cm/6":
![]()
I think that the the problem is due to the links of the radius arms: they tie too much the movement.
Now, the solutions could be two:
- the first is to modify these links, maybe putting round uniballs instead of the rubber (uniball like these:)![]()
- the second is to change radically the arms system: leave the radius arms but cut away the front bolt and add an arm on the top of the axle, building something like a 3 link.
Now, what do you think about these suggestions? Can you tell me other options (please consider that the whole work is done and I wouldn't change it too much...).
Please help me, once again!
Francesco
Do you think so? My fear is to penalize travel too much.
Maybe the problem is the pression of N2 in the shocks, too low; in effect, sunday when I tried the car I wanted to high a little bit the pression but at the end I didn't do it, maybe I should...
Francesco