Differences between 100 series and FJ Cruiser

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

There are quite a few of us now going from FJCs to 100 series.

Yep, seems like it...Probably a market development Toyota did not anticipate.

Certainly one of the market angles was to get FJC buyers in the fold and buying Toyotas...But with the lofty price tag, of the 200 series, we certainly did not turn our next purchase to another new Toyota 4x4..

Bring us the 70 series in the US market and that would certainly change, imo.
 
It's pretty cool to see all of the familiar names from com. =]
 
I've had the same experience. Built Fj cruiser, built 80 (for sale), and now looking for a 100.
 
I am pretty sure that 100 series is the real deal. It's the pinnacle of the land cruiser brand.

FJC is more of a trendy plastic-mobile. ...like a Pontiac vibe. Just dont see the trend lasting very long. :popcorn:
 
I've had the same experience. Built Fj cruiser, built 80 (for sale), and now looking for a 100.

Exactly what i did, haha.

I honestly feel like the 100 is better suited for my needs. The FJ was a great vehicle, just needed some more room. It didn't hurt that my 100 was over $10K less than what i sold the FJ for.
 
Exactly what i did, haha.

I honestly feel like the 100 is better suited for my needs. The FJ was a great vehicle, just needed some more room. It didn't hurt that my 100 was over $10K less than what i sold the FJ for.

Nice!

My 100 was 9k less then my 07 4Runner and after I totaled it and got my insurance check, I had 21K to spend on the 100 and only spent 19. So I didn't do as well as you did...I know I paid a bit more then average for an 01 but mine was so clean and only 74k miles, I didn't mind.
 
Jumping in the discussion late but, like many here - a former FJC turned 100 guy. I like my FJC for a long time... then it started to wear on me. Too loud, too "tinny", cramped backseat... just wanted something a bit more substantial.
 
Best post I have ever read! "retard posters", that's classic.

Retard posters, classic? No. Tasteless? Yes.

Yep, seems like it...Probably a market development Toyota did not anticipate.

Certainly one of the market angles was to get FJC buyers in the fold and buying Toyotas...But with the lofty price tag, of the 200 series, we certainly did not turn our next purchase to another new Toyota 4x4..

Bring us the 70 series in the US market and that would certainly change, imo.

I considered a Tacoma crew cab as well, TRD. Very difficult to find one with reasonable miles for less than $25k or so in the Southeast. When I did it was a Prerunner. That said I wanted to stay with Toyota products. That and the Tacoma was still tight on space with 2 kids, a dog and gear.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the fj has three windshield wipers, this should have been discussed. At last check, my 100 only had 2.
 
I like reading this thread. Have wanted an FJC since they came out and sometimes I still wish I had one, then I read this again. Love the 100 although not the "fun" factor any longer.
For those that do not like $ in the comparison, it has to be there.
Do I want a much more newer and pricer used FJC rather than my 12 year old vehicle (2000 100)? If so, it Has to be substantially better and from those "in the know" in this thread the answer is NO. And to that I say thanks.
 
Here is something no one has really said. The FJC is more of a trail rig, like a Heep, small and made for having fun.

I think of the 100 as more of an expedition rig, its built for going on extended trips to east bumblef**k.

Thats not to say that they are not capable of performing either role.

I think a built 100 (lockers FR/RR, all the armor, 35s, etc) will go anywhere an equally built FJC will go. Mods for the FJC are more abundant and usually cheaper, but i probably see 20 modded FJCs for every modded 100 i see.

Lastly one is a LAND CRUISER, the other, well isn't. Even my friend that has a built FJC (mhslacrosse22 on here and the blue forum) admits to this.
 
Having driven, and wheeled all dinominations of 100 we get here, the FJC for 2 up is more fun, and doesnt really miss out on many creature comforts here, though we only get the 11 model.

The 100 is clumsy, not nice in the front, tends to understeer, and isnt as nice to drive with similar mods on, or off road, its weight in slippery conditions makes it worse.

The 011 FJC is 150 series platform here, is shorter, and better approach and departure angle, 250kg lighter [500#] factory locker standard, rear parking sensors, reverse camera, and the mirror shape works very well for me. When Im loaded I cant see out the back of the 100, or FJC, the FJC has better equipment to cope with this std.

4X4 Australia mag just awarded it 4x4 of the year, using independent judges, over the 200 series, new Jeep GC, g-wagen, RR vogue, saying "fj's fun factor and simplicity of design won the judges over".

It was a shock result for 4X4 Aust mag, after the judges voted independently, after a week of testing, with 3 1'sts, 2 second places and a 3rd from 4wders, a couple of writers, editor.

Its a fun, love it or hate it car, the FJC, and the more I drive mine, the more I like it. When I heard it was coming, I decided against building a trick 100.

Im within a couple of inches of travel of my slinky long travel 80 set ups with IFS, and has more than our slinky long travel 100 set ups.

fjcramp.jpg


Its a fun, lighter, shorter, better handling, faster, car, if thats what your into.

fjccarvingbeach.jpg

fjcbeachphotoshootfronttwisted.jpg

rayroberts100bpking3inchslinky35s.jpg

autocraftbashplate100ifsfromfrontdsoffset.jpg


I dont have kids either, so could consider the FJ, and its great door set up for 2 up touring, rather than go with the leather elbow patched cardy wearing 100 drivers set, who, going by some posts here, look at the FJ, and think mmmm, if only, just a little, for a second, before coming back to reality, of back seat occupants, more gear for them, wifes prefers the 100, yes, I have to like my hundy...
 
[QUOTE="pman

Lastly one is a LAND CRUISER, the other, well isn't. Even my friend that has a built FJC (mhslacrosse22 on here and the blue forum) admits to this.[/QUOTE]

The Hilux isn't technically a LC either unless I' m mistaken but it's a legend around the world
 
my wife just bought a '12 FJ and loves it. She prefers it over her SC430 and my '99 LC. I like it more every time i drive it, too. As agile as the LC and the visibility isn't as bad as everyone says if you take the rear headrests out. We keep them in a tote in the back. My only real complaint is the back seats don't fold down flat. Nor will those on the 100. I can almost sleep in the back of the FJ and can't begin to in the 100. She didn't get the TRD model and the struts are a little soft for my taste. Drivetrain is almost as smooth as that on the 100. JBL radio has great speakers but lacks power(compared to the aftermarket Kenwood in my tacoma). Fuel tank needs about 5 more gallons capacity with the disappointing mileage. 17 to 22 is what we are seeing with it. The 22 was in Big Bend National Park with 45mph speed limit. Average is about 18.5 to 19, same as the Tacoma. on long trips i carry one of those flat, 3 gallon gas tanks on the roof rack. I also wish the rear door opened down rather than out and the rear window would retract into it. Pop up style rear window is useless. All said, we are quite pleased with it.
 
Interesting read as I am considering moving to a 100. Almost got a '00 over the summer but the deal went south. Still looking for a really good deal as I'm pretty patient on my search.

I wouldn't even consider the move if it was for having two little kids getting bigger and the suicide doors being a pain. Yes it is doable, but it's beginning to annoy me.

What keeps me from selling my FJ is that I really enjoy driving the thing. It's got a lot of character and I know it's going to last a lot longer than anything made here in the states (including Toyotas built here)

I'm sure a 100 would be step up in quality, but it could be a con if you do go wheeling. All that niceness would get all messed up after a few real wheeling trips.

Another thing I've considered is the overall cost of maintenance and upkeep. Parts are probably more expensive on a 100 over an FJC. Hey, these things were very pricey when new, so I'm sure replacing components would cost a lot more than a FJC.

Also wondering how much a stealership would charge for a 90k service for an FJC versus a 100. I'm sure the 100 would be a lot more.

I would keep my FJ and buy a 100, but that isn't an option for me, so it's been pretty tough making this type of decision.

Nice points made by everyone who posted their observations.
 
Interesting read as I am considering moving to a 100. Almost got a '00 over the summer but the deal went south. Still looking for a really good deal as I'm pretty patient on my search.

I wouldn't even consider the move if it was for having two little kids getting bigger and the suicide doors being a pain. Yes it is doable, but it's beginning to annoy me.

What keeps me from selling my FJ is that I really enjoy driving the thing. It's got a lot of character and I know it's going to last a lot longer than anything made here in the states (including Toyotas built here)

I'm sure a 100 would be step up in quality, but it could be a con if you do go wheeling. All that niceness would get all messed up after a few real wheeling trips.

Another thing I've considered is the overall cost of maintenance and upkeep. Parts are probably more expensive on a 100 over an FJC. Hey, these things were very pricey when new, so I'm sure replacing components would cost a lot more than a FJC.

Also wondering how much a stealership would charge for a 90k service for an FJC versus a 100. I'm sure the 100 would be a lot more.

I would keep my FJ and buy a 100, but that isn't an option for me, so it's been pretty tough making this type of decision.

Nice points made by everyone who posted their observations.

It's only a matter of time G.... muahhhaaaa
 
At the end of day, both vehicles are Toyota, and they both are built with serious engineering and reliability. Both vehicles are pinnacles of the 4wd community. I would not be afraid to take either around the world into any element.

Cargo and passenger dictates one over the other.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom