Looks like a good setup. Any recommendation for experienced installers around San Diego, Orange County area?
Bilstein 6112/5160 Installed (21 Viewers)
- Thread starter Robert B
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I’m in OC I’ve always had my suspension done by my Goodyear guys where I have lifetime alignment , no issues
Sac Cerevisiae
Reid
I recently had my truck in for a service and suspension check at Rock Solid Toys in Anaheim. Wyatt and his guys are great and are trying to do more service and install work for Land Cruisers.
Are you going for a level stance? I'm looking to lift the front ~2.0" but I don't want to raise the rear any.
I’m replacing the factory spacer with the 1” setting on 6112 I am not interested in going higher because my clearance is tight as it is for parking lots, ski lodges etc (with skis on top). Just looking for the better peformance. I think more that 1” will make the front a tad higher than the rear
Most people who level or lift just the front wind up realizing after that the built in rake is there to help posture and support when there is a load. Something like this - 2017 LC Upgrades: Order of Operations Questions
This is true, but not my application. I have had the factory spacer for 2 years and have not regretted the look and stance. I have seen the use of airbags to compensate when heavy loads in the rear are in place
Tommy Dwyer
SILVER Star
This. It kills me how many “lifted - leveled” pick ups I see around here that are driving around with a load in the bed...and the front end pointed skyward. If you intend to carry anything in your cargo area, leave some rake.
I have used these in other trucks...
timbren.com
Timbren SES Suspension Enhancement System SKU# TORLC2 - Rear Kit
The Timbren TORLC2 SES is a rear suspension enhancement system for the MODEL_NAME made between YEAR1 and Year2. Shop now.
timbren.com
I have used these in other trucks...
Timbren SES Suspension Enhancement System SKU# TORLC2 - Rear Kit
The Timbren TORLC2 SES is a rear suspension enhancement system for the MODEL_NAME made between YEAR1 and Year2. Shop now.
I used to install the Timbrens and Firestone airbags at a former employer. The airbags are a much better ride loaded than the Timbrens .
I’m toying with the idea of setting the front to 2” and just adding 1” in the rear
would this work?
1” rear coil spacer
or is there a better version?
would this work?
1” rear coil spacer
or is there a better version?
I am considering picking up this kit.
Front struts/coils: 47-273146
RR Shock: 25-285529
LR: Shock: 25-291810
Question: is it recommended to use the Bilstein rear springs also?
Rear Coils: 53-292018
I have a set of OME 2720 available I could use to save some money. I am only looking for ~1" lift.
Anyone have a suggestion on stone guards for the rear shocks?
Front struts/coils: 47-273146
RR Shock: 25-285529
LR: Shock: 25-291810
Question: is it recommended to use the Bilstein rear springs also?
Rear Coils: 53-292018
I have a set of OME 2720 available I could use to save some money. I am only looking for ~1" lift.
Anyone have a suggestion on stone guards for the rear shocks?
I would say yes to Bilstein rear springs. It'll give you the best chance at having a cohesive suspension "system".
When major companies and OEMs tune suspensions, they take into things like the natural frequency of each axle. Then the ride frequency, interaction, and balance between the front to rear axles so that a chassis can take a bump in unison. I'd imagine Bilstein to have mature methodologies in their development and tuning process, and the only way to get that is to utilize all parts of their suspension system.
If I'm not incorrect, Bilstein sets up the shock in an inverted orientation, meaning shaft up high and protected. It also uses a dust cover. Just as OEMs would set them up for longer durability. Another big difference over race shock configurations so stone guards concerns don't necessarily apply.
When major companies and OEMs tune suspensions, they take into things like the natural frequency of each axle. Then the ride frequency, interaction, and balance between the front to rear axles so that a chassis can take a bump in unison. I'd imagine Bilstein to have mature methodologies in their development and tuning process, and the only way to get that is to utilize all parts of their suspension system.
If I'm not incorrect, Bilstein sets up the shock in an inverted orientation, meaning shaft up high and protected. It also uses a dust cover. Just as OEMs would set them up for longer durability. Another big difference over race shock configurations so stone guards concerns don't necessarily apply.
Good point, the fronts are shock shaft on top, assume the rears are too.
Greetings. I recently installed this kit that the OP has. I did not have to mess with the KDSS shutter valves for the rear install, but I did loosen them to raise and lower the KDSS piston for the front swaybar to get it lined up with the passenger side control arm. Ride height is spot on all around with perch #5. Alignment came out well, and the truck certainly rides nicer than oem.
Edit for a few misc notes :
- I used a come-along to line up the rear member when reinstalling. I was afraid the lift would offset the rear by too much, but have found my thrust angle to be at 0.02 degrees. Good enough for me.
- fishing an adjustable wrench on top of the new rear bilstein shock to tighten the 21MM bolt without the shaft spinning was interesting and challenging
-
Edit for a few misc notes :
- I used a come-along to line up the rear member when reinstalling. I was afraid the lift would offset the rear by too much, but have found my thrust angle to be at 0.02 degrees. Good enough for me.
- fishing an adjustable wrench on top of the new rear bilstein shock to tighten the 21MM bolt without the shaft spinning was interesting and challenging
-
Last edited:
