Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Which reminds me, I'm curious what happened with that 80 loop failure - any pictures? Seems like one description was the loop failed, then another said neither the bolts, the weld, nor the loop failed. Which?
DougM
And yes, I'd STILL like more details or pics of the only 80 tow point ever reported failed. Thanks.
I am sure the engineers wouldnt have put them there if they couldnt handle the weight of the truck!!
![]()
There are several vendors that sell the bolt-on brackets and you can use your own D-shackles. Most prefer the screw in pins over the cotter pin style.
-B-
What I don't like about the point Walking Eagle shows here is that it's designed to mount on a flat face and the breaking strength will rely solely on the fasteners. Unless you've got a large and thick flat plate to mount it to (such as you'll find on bulldozers and construction equipment), bolts will tend to deform (which instantly weakens the mount) the surface and perhaps pull right through it on the next pull. A thick metal plate welded across the frame horns that faced straight down could be a way to turn this into a mount exposed only to shear forces, and it would double as a skid plate and frame horn reinforcement.
yes, and in the back, I can only use one of the hoops (left IIRc) with a shackle cuz the hitch receiver is in the way...
True, but the receiver hitch makes a good recovery point.
As for Walking Eagle's implication that 18,000 lbs working force is somehow light... Dude, thats 9 tons working. Yield is generally 5x working with deformation > 2x. For perspective the some of the 4 bolt versions put forward by vendors here that are used and abused regularly are only rated for 6,000 lbs pull.