Totally disagree. Due to sold numbers alone the 200 will stay up there and has potential long term collectors value like the 80.
Also most buyers, in the US at least, do not like small I-4 turbos or hybrid technology.
How is $60 to $70k on a used LC200 more than the new one at say 5 to15k marked up MSRP, as stated above?
View attachment 3578007
Once you chose the higher end model with desirable features, you could be over $80k and now Toyota is selling you a Prado for Land Cruiser 200/300 pricing. I guess good for profits and Toyota stock...
I think those dealer markups will yield to MSRP once the new 4runner hits showrooms, if not sooner. I expect that'll push 200s into the $40s or low or mid $50s for the best examples.
I don't see a turbo / hybrid phobia; US consumers are buying more of both than ever; it's modern power. And, I just don't see the 200 holding collector status anything like the 80, which with its coils atop rigid axles and three locking differentials was truly unique in the mechanical linage of US market Land Cruisers.
What I do see is Toyota having hoodwinked 200 buyers, and especially "heritage edition" buyers, who paid dearly for a presumably final US offering of the legendary badge only to relaunch that badge a few years later.
And I see that fact (and understandable hurt) clouding clear thinking about how the new better Land Cruiser (as will be perceived by most consumers) will sharply erode the value of the old used Land Cruiser that it replaces.
Last edited: