Warm beer and cold women!
Hmmm... wait a minute
Hmmm... wait a minute
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
If the production model actually looked like this, it’d be on the short list of replacement options for me!Tangential, but the future is unknown to the public. They are releasing the first look at what their brainstorming behind the scenes for the next generation like this concept
![]()
In addition, we do know they are benchmarking alot of particle ev offerings from rivian and tesla and legacy oems. If one direction of LC will include evs, we should see some mules (if you when were to look) similar to how they were testing the 300 series chassis in the south west under 200 series cabins.
Now that I have you, have you heard of the church of 5w30?This is probably the wildest thread out there now. Went from 200 series vs. 250 not being LCs (At least not with a PRADO label attached to it) to dog breeds to EVs to real LCs have tail gates to easy women in America. Can't wait to hear whats next...![]()
There it is! On a long enough timeline all threads lead to 5w30.
It's a shame that Toyota had to make decisions based on EPA regulations and whatever else,
From an emissions perspective, the government had everything to do with it.Dont think epa had much to do with it. They decided to make it a luxury vehicle, and price in the stratosphere.
Hence why you only see LX600 and not LC300 in the USA.
it is spendy, but that's not necessarily why the LC 300 never made it here.Dont think epa had much to do with it. They decided to make it a luxury vehicle, and price in the stratosphere.
Hence why you only see LX600 and not LC300 in the USA.
This is likely the most straight forward explanation. CAFE and all its consequences.From an emissions perspective, the government had everything to do with it.
From an emissions perspective, the government had everything to do with it.
Yes, but as you said above Toyota decided to stick with luxurious and they did not want to keep running two luxurious pricey SUVs, as they were doing before. On top of that, they (smartly so) created a big momentum/deal about the LC being killed in the US and used that to fool the US market into a new "Land Cruiser" which is in fact a PRADO, knowing the shopping moms would not care about the LC300.How does a 3.5TT in a LC300 have different emissions than the same 3.5TT in a LX600?
Bottom line is if an LX600 can come to the USA market, an equivalent LC300 could have also.
Same here. Most of them are replacing 5th gen 4runners and GX 460s.I’m already seeing more of the hybrid Landcruisers driving around than I ever saw 200s during its whole lifecycle. We all know it’s about the money.
Amen on all of this.I’m already seeing more of the hybrid Landcruisers driving around than I ever saw 200s during its whole lifecycle. We all know it’s about the money.
Theres another thing too, in America we have plenty of financing and leasing options. So it encourages consumerism and disposable cars. Toyota doesn’t run any decent lease programs, because with the resale value of a Land Cruiser they really could. So you’re faced with financing $85,000 Toyota vs a $0 down $1000 lease (pre covid craziness) on an X7 with a 500 horsepower v8, 400+ miles of range, all the new tech, much more friendly to drive.
Where the 200/300 is popular, I would wager most of them are bought cash and will be kept in the family for many years. In this use case people can easily see money well spent.
This is exactly who the 250 is for.Same here. Most of them are replacing 5th gen 4runners and GX 460s.
I take issue with the luxury vehicle part, as I posted previously in this thread. At least the earlier 200's were not overtly luxury, not at all when compared to the 80's and 100's. Regarding the higher price, the vehicle was overbuilt and joyfully bought by those in the know. If you want a luxury SUV go buy an Escalade or Navigator, neither of which are built as well and cost much less.Dont think epa had much to do with it. They decided to make it a luxury vehicle, and price in the stratosphere.
Hence why you only see LX600 and not LC300 in the USA.
I’ve noticed this my way as well. I counted three gx550s and five LC250’s in Costco parking lot yesterday.I’m already seeing more of the hybrid Landcruisers driving around than I ever saw 200s during its whole lifecycle. We all know it’s about the money.
Theres another thing too, in America we have plenty of financing and leasing options. So it encourages consumerism and disposable cars. Toyota doesn’t run any decent lease programs, because with the resale value of a Land Cruiser they really could. So you’re faced with financing $85,000 Toyota vs a $0 down $1000 lease (pre covid craziness) on an X7 with a 500 horsepower v8, 400+ miles of range, all the new tech, much more friendly to drive.
Where the 200/300 is popular, I would wager most of them are bought cash and will be kept in the family for many years. In this use case people can easily see money well spent.
Funny.I think the perceived prestige is what the 200 was lacking, at least with regards to the general population. Those that know understood, but how many times have you had someone compliment your 200 by calling it a Sequoya or Highlander?
Most folks that spend $90k on a car want their neighbors to know they spent $90k on a car. Most folks that bought new 200 series from the dealer probably DIDN'T want their neighbors to know they bought a $90k vehicle. Or at least knew what they were buying and didn't care whether or not anyone else thought it was a Highlander.