Hello—my 71 fj40 came without a fan shroud. I had another which I -thought- was from a 71 but when installed the fan would not clear it. Does anyone have a pic of the correct shroud for a 71? Or have an extra one they’d want to sell me, lol. Thanks!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Thanks!No I think I have the wrong shroud. I’ll get a photo of it and post. Don’t know which year it’s from!
Thanks!
If you have an "F" motor ( 1F ) , that shroud would be correct if everything is stock. If your 71 had a 2F transplant you should use the 2F shroud. The 2F usually used a fan clutch so the face of the fan moved and the shroud became shallower. The 2F fan will bolt to an early radiator support . Left /Right, Up/Down position of the motor didn't change so the center point position of either shrouds fan opening\
is the same. Specter does show two of the early fan shrouds, 1965-1968 and 1968-1974 but the fan is the same for both so the differences must be little. The fact that the 6 blade plastic became available in 73 leads me to believe that the fan diameter is the same.
The plastic fan was run with a spacer until the clutch was introduced
Here’s another angle. Doesn’t seem like it clears the fan if installed this way.
View attachment 2072679
Interesting. Never paid attention to the 25 shroud before, but it does look the same. And the fit with the other shroud was definitely off, and in the same way it would be off if had been designed for the taller F135 block.I’m wondering if the mystery shroud is from an FJ25? Found a link to a mud build with a photo!
View attachment 2073183
Crisis averted. In my pile of relatively organized cruiser parts, after looking like 5 times, I found the correct shroud. Still have no idea what year the other one is for—perhaps an older model? Anyway, thanks for all your suggestions.
View attachment 2073148