Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I believe the RW is 24 lbs...not certain the weight of the 2016 wheel but I know someone on here will
Bump, anyone have weight on the 2016+ stock wheels?
Bump, anyone have weight on the 2016+ stock wheels?
Sorry to hijack this thread but was wondering if the 2017 Tundra TRD Wheels with a P275/65 R18 Tire fit the LX 570 without any rubbing issues? It looks like the overall diameter is only 2.8% different...Also, how hard is it to transfer the TPMS and fit this sized spare under the truck?
Sorry to hijack this thread but was wondering if the 2017 Tundra TRD Wheels with a P275/65 R18 Tire fit the LX 570 without any rubbing issues? It looks like the overall diameter is only 2.8% different...Also, how hard is it to transfer the TPMS and fit this sized spare under the truck?
I think 285/65/18 is the size you want, 32.6" compared to the popular 285/70/17 size at 32.7". And you should probably go with LT tires for their higher specifications than P-metric.
I'm with Chocolate for the 285/65/18. Just for a bit more height and maintaining at least stock width. I know everyone is focused on straight line traction, but going down in width gives up braking and cornering performance. Especially when lifting and going to an A/T tread/compound already further compromises that.
I can weigh my take offs then subtract the posted weight of the AT23s. Unfortunately I'm on business travel so it won't be for a couple of weeks.
Just to follow up on this, I actually sold the tires off my stock wheels (I know, I was surprised someone wanted just the tires, too). I weighed the bare rim and it came out to just about 33 lbs so the RW saves 11 lbs without rigs and 9 lbs with. In this context that's huge.
Subscribed. Awesome question, and you sound like you're thinking the same thing I am, so I'm curious what you end up doing and what the impact is. My lean currently is either:
Icon 17x8.5 +25 wheels with 285/75R17 Nitto Ridge Grapplers
RW 17x8 +50 wheels with 285/70R17 BFG KO2s. Or the above Nittos if I use 1" spacers.
Fuel Anza 18x9 +20 wheels with 275/70R18 BFG KO2s
I like the Icons (Slee has them on the LX), but they're lug-centric and I don't know the hub bore so no idea if there's a hub ring that would work with them.
I like the RWs and I'd like the extra offset for the look and possibly UCA/suspension clearance since at the moment I'm not lifted. But RW availability is spotty, and I'd prefer not to deal with spacers if I didn't need to.
I like the Fuel Anza, which looks similar to the Icon, but there's a limited number of tires available in 285/70R18 as you've noticed.
17" tires are a lot heavier, and other than the RW I'm curious how wheel fitment will impact any brake upgrades. i.e. with the 17" Icon wheels could you still upgrade to the 2016+ LC or the 2007+ Tundra front brakes which are a few mm wider circumference IIRC.
So yeah I'm very curious how higher offset affects handling. Personally with the stock +60 wheels I feel like the handling is loose or sloppy, particularly on the highway where I feel like the LC wanders more than my 3rd gen 4Runner or 2nd gen MDX did.
Just to follow up on this, I actually sold the tires off my stock wheels (I know, I was surprised someone wanted just the tires, too). I weighed the bare rim and it came out to just about 33 lbs so the RW saves 11 lbs without rings and 9 lbs with. In this context that's huge.
Really? I weighed my stock wheels from my 2013 and they were 26 lbs IIRC. Definitely not >30
Linuxgod, you had mentioned "sloppy handling" on your stock set up. Did your new set up alleviate this it does it still exist? Thanks