>>moronic? thanks for the compliment.
Your wellcome!
>ferraris are POS? hmmm, thats interesting. yes they take tuning; most high >strung cars do. americans are used to mall cruisers so anything that requires >a bit of tweaking is a "pos" to a lot of folks.
I was thinking more along the lines of buring to the ground along the side of the road from electrical fires, using massive amounts of oil when new, countless tow ins to the dealer ship that were DOA, massive failures of major components, problems that techs can't troubleshoot or even begin to resolve, all the good crappy car stuff. How do I know? My friend worked for a Ferrari dealer for a few years before he walked off the job one day. He had 30 years of turning wrenches at VW and Benz and could not stand Ferrari - what does that tell you?
Not to mention the fact, that aside from making some really fast cars, they make some really lame cars for dentists to drive around in.
To put some Land Cruiser content in the post, I don't know how you can even compare a car like a Ferrari or a race car to a Land Cruiser. I really can't see how you can make a connection that because Enzo once used Webers that they would be great carbs. And, while we are on the subject, Ferrari put out a lot of cars with BOTH Weber and Dellorto...get your facts straight.
>of course there *is* my lotus seven with twin webers (spelling) but i wont go >into that.
OK, now we all think that you are the coolest guy ever!

That might impress some folks at the Land Rover board...
If you don't have any first hand experince with the subject matter at hand, I don't think you have much to offer with making references to things that are not relevent.