Want lift with OEM ride

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Maverick - help me, please...I've ordered the Bilstein 6112 with 2.2 inch lift and 1.25 inch spacers on factory wheels. To run 295 tires, I expect to remove the mud flaps, minor trim on front fender lip, and use a heat gun to reshape the inner well but have not heard anyone say that new UCAs are required for clearance.
You may not need aftermarket UCA’s. I absolutely consider them a must when I run bigger tires and a lift on the 200. However, you may not need them with spacers and also for the fact you may never go off-road or at the most 1x per year and I’m assuming it’s nothin you can’t do if the 200 was bone stock. I am just going off what you said at the beginning of your thread post “rarely go off-road“. Personally, you might be better off going with a smaller tire 285/65r18 SL rated Falken WP. It’s the only tire “pricey” in this load rating. The tire is a big factor in ride quality and E-rated tires are less forgiving. They do have benefits on our 200 in terms of on/off road protection. But if you’re 99% driving highway in Washington, SL is the way to go. I lived in Seattle and never once thought “boy, sure wish I had E-rated tires“ and I’ve taken my SL tires on some fun”easy-moderate“trails around Mt. Baker, etc.
 
You may not need aftermarket UCA’s. I absolutely consider them a must when I run bigger tires and a lift on the 200. However, you may not need them with spacers and also for the fact you may never go off-road or at the most 1x per year and I’m assuming it’s nothin you can’t do if the 200 was bone stock. I am just going off what you said at the beginning of your thread post “rarely go off-road“. Personally, you might be better off going with a smaller tire 285/65r18 SL rated Falken WP. It’s the only tire “pricey” in this load rating. The tire is a big factor in ride quality and E-rated tires are less forgiving. They do have benefits on our 200 in terms of on/off road protection. But if you’re 99% driving highway in Washington, SL is the way to go. I lived in Seattle and never once thought “boy, sure wish I had E-rated tires“ and I’ve taken my SL tires on some fun”easy-moderate“trails around Mt. Baker, etc.
Awesome point. Wish there was a non-E, 285-70-18 all terrain tire?
 
Maverick - help me, please...I've ordered the Bilstein 6112 with 2.2 inch lift and 1.25 inch spacers on factory wheels. To run 295 tires, I expect to remove the mud flaps, minor trim on front fender lip, and use a heat gun to reshape the inner well but have not heard anyone say that new UCAs are required for clearance.

With a 1.25" spacer and 295s, you should have no issue with clearance to the OEM UCA. The primary driver for UCA is caster if you're lifting more than ~2".

I'm a proponent of less suspension lift and larger tires. The 200-series handles large tires with great manners, and IMO has better handling with mild suspension lifts that keep geometries in the sweet spot.
 
Has anyone had experience specifically with these two? Maybe a comparison.
General Grabber AT 275 70 r18 SL rated
Falken Wildpeak AT 285/65r18 SL rated
after reading all the threads I think for me being primarily on road driving and not wanting to get new UCA and trim it’s in my best interest to go with one of these sizes in an SL rated tire and unfortunately there aren’t many choices in 18”.
 
Has anyone had experience specifically with these two? Maybe a comparison.
General Grabber AT 275 70 r18 SL rated
Falken Wildpeak AT 285/65r18 SL rated
after reading all the threads I think for me being primarily on road driving and not wanting to get new UCA and trim it’s in my best interest to go with one of these sizes in an SL rated tire and unfortunately there aren’t many choices in 18”.
General Grabber recently released their ATX all terrain in SL load rating. The ATX gets solid reviews, I thought it was a good tire with solid road manners for an AT tire. I would go with the ATX over their APT as the APT isn't severe snow rated in the SL rating for 275/70r18, if that is a priority for you too.

 
General Grabber recently released their ATX all terrain in SL load rating. The ATX gets solid reviews, I thought it was a good tire with solid road manners for an AT tire. I would go with the ATX over their APT as the APT isn't severe snow rated in the SL rating for 275/70r18, if that is a priority for you too.

Thanks @TLC2013 good to hear positive feedback as I think this size would look best as well.
 
I agree, and after experimenting with different PSI's I now run between 36-39 psi with my LT275/70r18, significantly smoother ride. Tire wear is still even and high speed handling hasnt been impacted.
Circling back to this, while it was nice enjoying the smoother ride I ended up bumping up the PSI. After around 2,500 miles I started noticing unusual tread wear with cold PSI around 36. I do drive some miles of winding backcountry roads which I think compounded the issue and led to some "heel toe wear" on both front tires. The rears were still wearing normally. On the front two tires the outside lugs were wearing with a sawtooth pattern. Running your fingers over the tread and sipes you could feel the low and high spots. After checking alignment and doing a rotation I bumped up the cold PSI to 41 and the wear is slowly being corrected/evening out, should be back to normal in a couple more tanks of fuel.

20230219_140325.webp


20230219_140311_resized.webp
 
I'm not sure if this is the correct thread but it seemed like the most recent to share. I'm also more of a learner on this forum vs. poster but I've very much appreciated the amount of information that helped make my final decision. I also wanted a lift that did not require new UCA's etc. while trying to maintain as much of a stock oem ride as possible while getting rid of nose dive and lean as this is my DD and 95% road use. Anyway several threads and members eventually led me to the following decision for my '19 Base...

Pre-lift adds were....
-Front windows tinted as much as law would allow
-BBS wheels with HE inserts
-Toyo 285-60R18 XL
Lift
-Dobinson IMS59-60688 IFP Front Struts
-Dobinson C59-540 1.4" Front Coils (black) - thanks to @crikymike at Exit offroad
-Take off 2021 HE (2 row) springs - these are longer than the base and 3 row HE springs (red/white & red/orange marks) thanks to @Eric Sarjeant
-Everything was installed and aligned at H&H in Charlotte, NC - Great experience - Dean is very knowledgeable in all things LC. Highly recommend his shop.

Measurements from center hub to bottom of fender
Pre-lift: no idea on gas fill

Drivers Side
Front - 20"
Rear - 21-1/4"
Passenger Side
Front - 20-1/4"
Rear - 21-1/4"

Post Lift 1/2 tank gas
Drivers Side
Front - 22"
Rear - 23-1/4"
Passenger Side
Front - 21-3/4"
Rear - 23"

First of all, it's noticeably higher when I got in to drive for first time and it definitely drives different but in a very good way. Nose dive gone and lean/roll gone. I was surprised as it was slightly more lift than I thought (1.5") vs. (1.75" ish) but it drives so much better it's much more responsive and tight if that makes sense. For me going this route was 100% the right call. Now I just don't know what to do with larger tires as clearly they look tiny now and I don't want to run e -rated tires for fear of harsher ride quality. Not much to choose from unfortunately. It's either of these two unless someone else knows of other as I'm clearly not a guru.
-275 70R18 General Grabber A/T X SL rated (33.2 diameter)
-285 65R18 Falken Wildpeak A/T3W SL rated (32.6 diameter)

FWIW - I hope this helps others as they are navigating various options as much as they helped me! Thanks all.


Before & After

View attachment 3222981

View attachment 3222982


I think I’m going to do the same lift. What shocks did you use in the rear? And how do you like the setup now that 10 months have passed?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom