I would tend to agree. I believe the standard tire size has a lot more to do with the typical markets the 200 is sold into at volume - the gulf states and Australia. Both are regions full of sand, where wider tires would be beneficial. The US market for the 200 is too small to sell wheels and tires for our market specific.I’m not an expert on this topic at all. But I question whether narrow tires (with adequate load rating) would be a negative at all. Lots of large SUV’s (Suburban, Expedition, Tahoe) of similar weight, size and capacity come on more narrow tires than the 285/60r18 that the LC comes with. Virtually all half ton pickups come on significantly more narrow tires. I have not seen braking tests of different width tires on these vehicles, but (within reason) I doubt braking distance is impacted by tire width as much as it is from tire weight, diameter, or tread pattern. And no one is likely to be doing hairpin cornering in these large SUV’s.
Off road, I have read many reviews from off-road guys including off road racing teams that prefer tall but fairly narrow tires, for a longer contact patch but with higher pressure on the ground than a wider tire would deliver.
Again, I’m not claiming to be an expert but I think many people fitting wide tires are doing so for looks, not performance.
The LR Defender comes with 255s and it is similar in size and weight.