mike_az said:
Hi Claudia,
I am collecting parts for the swap and thought I needed a proportioning valve for two main reasons. Disks require much greater pressure than drums, given the lower surface area present to apply the friction. So all else being equal the valve must shunt more pressure to the disk axle than the drum axle.
Second, equal pressure should not be applied to both axles. Even if the disk brakes were designed in such a way (e.g. size or mechanical advantage) that results in equal friction w/ the drum axle, you still need a valve because the front axle does more stoppping than the rear as the front axle loads up and vehicle rear lifts up during stopping. This second condition will only exacerbate the former problem. I supposed these were the reasons every vehicle I have owned w/ disk/drum setup had proportioning valve installed at the factory. That’s why I thought to just grab one off a disk brake 40 and have the factory-like setup.
Please let me know if I don't need the valve. It very well may be the case the mini-truck swap just happens to work well w/o the valve given this particular case (load distribution, wheelbase, calipers etc.)
thanks
Here's the deal, having converted my '40 to 4-wheel disk:
1. Drum brakes have a residual pressure valve (in order to prevent the springs in the drum to pull the shoes too far from the drum) - not to be confused with a proportioning valve. Disk brakes (in most cases) won't need the residual pressure valve, actually, you'll wear the pads quickly by having them too close to the rotor. But there are many combinations out there, some vehicles combine residual/prop (e.g. 1/2-ton Chevy), others have them separate (e.g. load-sensitive prop valves on higher-rated pickup trucks, etc.)
2. If you convert the front to disk, the residual pressure valve in the front brake circuit at the master cylinder needs to go. It's behind the big fitting that holds the brake line.
3. If you convert the rear, ditto. The residual pressure valve needs to go, rear circuit at the master (I hope you have a dual circuit master for safety reasons; if not, I'd sure get one).
4. The brake system needs to be calibrated so that the front brakes lock before the rear brakes do. In a disk-front-drums-rear setup, the front will lock before the rear without any prop valve, due to the superior stopping power of disk brakes.
5. Once you convert the rear brakes to disk as well, it was our experience that the rear will lock up way before the front brakes do - this was with a dual circuit master and no modification other than taking the residual pressure valves out of both circuits.
6. To correct this - i.e. to make the front lock before the rear does - we needed a proportioning valve that decreases fluid delivery to the rear and therefore brake power to the rear. We used a Wilwood valve, installed at the Master in the rear circuit outlet with a series of fittings (to go from NPT via -AN to Toyota metric inverted flare). I believe you can get a similar valve a bit cheaper from Summit Racing, and you don't need the -AN etc. fittings if you know how to make a double flare for a brake line; the Wilwood valve is for standard 3/16" brake line inverted flare, and it needs to mate up with the Toyota metric 10mm x 1.0 inverted flare threads.
7. The rear does not need more flow, and it doesn't need equal flow, it needs less.
8. We dialed in the setting on the prop valve simply by going on a dirt road and check which axle locks up first when braking from about 10mph, then adjusting the valve until we were satisfied with the setting. Without the valve (or in our case with the valve fully open), the rear axle would lock up on dry pavement. Drums were not even close to that kind of stopping power, it's not even funny. In addition, disks don't fade - if you've ever driven a trail like Hell's Revenge in Moab, you'll know what I mean by fade.
If you need more info or part numbers for the fittings, feel free to PM. If you want to see the prop valve setup, you may have to ask Tools for a picture....
