ryanjl
SILVER Star
Did you drive the 4Runner? I've been in one and what caught my attention immediately is the lack of 'off-road friendly' ergonomics; i.e. visiblity over the hood, out the back, etc.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
fzj said:o.k. bad religion, and I'm being serious because I love the new UZJ100's, tell me where all of the difference in build quality is, I know the interior feels more solid and is nicer, but as it has been discused on this site, the 4.7 liter engine the cruiser has in now in the Sequoia, Tundra, and the 4Runner, I believe the tranny and transfer cases are also shared on some of these models(correct me if I'm wrong), so you see, 10 years ago, I could tell people why they should drop the extra money for a LC over the rest of the Toyota line up, let's take say 95, the Landcruier came with optioal front and rear lockers, full floater rear axle, 212 hp straigh six, and larger and stronger overall running gear! Now it is hard to explain to people because(once again tell me if I'm wrong) the LC shares most of it's running gear with other Toyota rigs, so you no longer have this Flagship with the masive off road ability and the abilty for almost anyone to crawl under neath one and see exactly just how different it is from the rest of the trucks!
Cruisin'Carolina said:Since this is sooooo chat anyway.....
I think FZJ is really FSIMIG in disguise...