No surprise, there's a contingent of heritage die-hards. They relish and trade in tradition and long established value metrics. If given the option, would probably buy a brand new 80 or 70-series, rather than the likes of a 300-series. A Rivian or EV anything is just too much progression. Or heck, AHC suspension or Lexus features on an LC, that's already enough to have some screaming blasphomy. Even though much of that same broadly applied technology is what makes the 200-series so great.
Of course, that's not everyone here. There's just as many that value technology. Or the special mix and balance of technology, quality, and design found only in the 200-series. Interestingly, one of the raved upon qualities of the Rivian is the suspension. Hydraulic, cross-linking, adaptive damping, ride height adjustable....hrmm, where have I seen this before? Components supplied by Tenneco? Oh, the LC has had this tech since the 100-series in both LX and LC, and now exclusively in the 200-series LX (at least in the states). But of course, many LC owners won't give credit to Toyota. Nor much of the popular media which likes to sell it as a unique first, or liken it to superlative brands like McLaren.
There's just as many progressive and like minded here that have had the luxury of sampling other brands and cutting edge technology. Some that's been here more than 10 yrs now and has helped with enough understanding that EVs are truly the future. Because ICE cars simply can't keep up. It doesn't matter whether it's our generation that buys into these new fangled things anyhow. The new generations will decide. For performance, capability, etc., but perhaps other things that our generation can't adapt to or haven't valued enough like sustainability.