I'm not sure I could disagree with you more. I've read a bit of Rand criticism, but I have to say this is the first time I've seen 'sophomoric' or 'banal' used to describe her ideas.
Clearly this is a 'to each his own' matter...
Rand is basically a soap opera writer. In my mind she was good at getting "grand ideas" out to the masses and to make sure that the people she created in her books were very interesting to anyone who thought that the lives they were living could be something else, something great and fantastical.
Rand was interested in making Roark look like this Thor-like god architect (with FL Wright as an imaginary basis) with Alan Greenspan geekness; Francon is a an archetype of the woman that mean "yes" when she says "no"--all the while with a golden spoon in her mouth.
Ironically, Greenspan is a huge Rand fan. And spoke as she did in cryptic language that debased the reality of a real working human being--out there, on their own, trying to earn a living.
Trust me, I'm not a Marxist, or a socialist, or even a liberal. I actually find--in my mind--what she proposes as being rather worthwhile in an alternate world where everyone wears white and the world is white. That's not our world.
I guess in the end, I liked what she said at a time in my life where I needed what she said. And that itself is worthwhile. Like I said, I think she is a great soap opera writer--she did do her best writing in Los Angeles.
The one book that I really love of Rand's and still do to this day is "Anthem"--where a man and a woman find out the word (yes, it is a word in Rand's world": "I" It's a dystopian book and a great read....you can do it in a night. It's a fun book. Read that and then watch George Lucas's USC Graduate degree film: THX1138... they are one and the same.
Anyway, I digress probably a bit too much for this crowd...
Where is the moonshine??
