Dusty said:
scott I didn't use rubber isolators on the earls cooler because I surrounded the entire cooler in an alum box so there is no conflicting tension on the tabs. vibration may be an issue.... but I might as well take the thing off because I honestly didn't see any diff in water temps with this cooler-and a good cooler it is (yes 10an/5/8 line) That said I havn't run the mojave pass in the summer since the install and I dont have forced induction (yet)
The tensioin isn't what causes them to fail, it's vibration, this is a known issue Dusty. My suggestion is two fold on the oil cooler. First, take it away from the fan, mount it in natural airflow, so it's only cooling when moving, faster speed = more cooling. Second, find a thermostat that opens at 100C, that's the optimal oil temperature. The problem with most sandwich coolers, is that they are meant for race cars, so thermostats are set at 175 or 190 so they are fully open at 210. It appears you don't need your cooler to operate that much. So open it at 210, so it's fully open at 220.
this past summer I also did weeks of testing with cardboard over the cooler and again I didn't see any significant diff in oil or water temp. im sure the cooler makes a diff in race cars and may make a diff w heavy loads or forced induction. it probably makes more of a diff as the engine/oil/water temp gets hotter because there is more room for heat exchange but still, my expensive experiment (n=1) didn't indicate the cooler makes a diff at temps bw 200-210
You really don't want it to either. Dusty, every single factory turbocharged audi from 1982>today has a thermostatically controlled oil cooler from the factory. Every single one of these applications (1mm+ production cars - no exceptinos) also has 2 noticeable features with them: 1) a 100c thermostat and 2) no fan attached to it. I've experimented with 80 and 87C thermostats in them, and actually gotten oil blowby because the engine never got hot. Hence, my claim that cooler running engines isn't necessarily a better thing, without a definition. I target all my machines (race, street, offroad, etc) to hit 100C, then stay there, at all costs. Including attaching 48 and 60 row oil coolers...
I support these opinions and my experience with these SAE references:
880258 - which speaks to breakdown of oils running too rich a mixture
860103 - which speaks to temp stability and heat buildup on force inducted engines
970922 - "Development of Modern Engine Lubrication Systems" - which addresses ideal temps, pressures, saturation and aeration of oils.
The risks of too cold are well documented, oil blowby, premature bearing wear because no oil vaporization, cold/enriched ECU timing and fuel, emissions issues, oil saturation, oil areation and engine thermo inefficiency.
Change the need with a heat pump, or hot climes, or hot towing, the oil cooler will be your most effective weapon in the heat arsenal. I wouldn't ditch it quite yet, maybe change it's location to be away from the fan, or put in an electrically operated fan.
Scott Justusson