Factory Lockers or ARB in the 80 Series.
and performance differences.
and performance differences.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Junk said:Factory hands down. I hate ARBs.
concretejungle said:I also agree with reffug (damn i'm doing that a lot lately) i think the splines are tighter and there isn't an actuator to bang-up.
robbie, christo????.......
cruiserdan said:I prefer the OEM locks to the degree that I retro-fitten them to mine using new parts.
Landpimp said:a smart shoper would have bought the 80 new in 93 with the lockers already installed![]()
cruiserdan said:A smart shopper did buy right (for the time-frame) There were NO deals to be had even for employees and they were 40+ G's. Mine was a brass hat from the Denver Region office. It was only 32 G's.....![]()
Landpimp said:would have sworn we paid $36K for moms 97 new in 97 with OEM lockers(traded a 62 Vette in on it
Brass Hat? demo? or dealer rep car?
your 93 must have been rear disc, FF and ABS to be able to add the OEM lockers.........either that or there is a 93-4 running around with Dans old rear end in it![]()
cruiserdan said:Yes, ABS and FFA. The ONLY thing it was lacking was lockers. Mine is a very early production vehicle (9-92), most of the first batch to come over was less locks. It was a factory-owned demo. It was still on an MSO when I got it.
97's were bumping 50k. 36k would be below invoice.
cruiserdan said:A smart shopper did buy right (for the time-frame) There were NO deals to be had even for employees and they were 40+ G's. Mine was a brass hat from the Denver Region office. It was only 32 G's.....![]()