Chris -
Oh shoot, a 100-series tank, really?
That tank appears to me to be the one used on the 105 (the straight axle version of the 100). I have a pix in my files labeled "105 subtank" that is identical to the pix you posted above.
Well that stinks, sounds like I will have trouble with the straps then.
When I originally did this mod (many years ago...), I tried to use this 105 tank. The tank fits into the space on the 80 with no issues, but the 105 tank straps are too long by just a bit to fit in the prescribed location (i.e., the holes used for the proper 80 series tank and straps). To try to shorten the straps seemed to be too much of a PIA, so I gave it up and sourced an 80 tank and straps.
BTW, I did not have 80 straps available at the time, so I don't know what the outcome would have been using them on the 105 tank.
Additionally, I'm not certain that the proper 80 subtank pickup tube, and gauge sender and level switch will fit in the 105 tank ports. I'd have to think about that a bit to be sure...
Cheers, R-
PS: There are other issues with the tank you have pictured Chris.
This so-called 100/105 tank (if that really was its application) was designed for a submersible, in-tank transfer pump. The port for the pump (larger hole) is approx 107mm (from my notes) with a 6-hole pattern. The 80 series tank I am familiar with was designed for use with an external transfer pump, using a pick-up tube in that port position that measures 83mm with a 5-hole pattern.
Additionally, the 80 v. 100 fuel gauge sender that fits in the other port may have slight differences in the float arm length between the two tanks... which might result in fuel gauge accuracy issues.
FWIW, now I recall why I gave up on that tank. Yes, it fits ok... but it would have required one kludge after another to get all of the slightly different parts working together. R -