Thanks for chiming in, Christo! This will be the last comment I make on the subject and I'd like to state once more that I am not involved in the automotive industry specifically, nor do I have insight to Slee as a Corp. That being said, business infrastructure consists of common methodology.
I just want to clarify something here. We do not take orders for products we do not have in stock, or have in development / have delays in production. We offer the customer the choice that we enter a no obligation back order in the system to reserve a spot in line so that when the product becomes available, we will contact them and offer the product as a first come, first serve bases. We normally inform customers we will contact them when products are available. In the case of the LX570 sliders, they are not available yet, hence the lack in any communication. Since we do not have a hard delivery date yet, it would serve no purpose to contact customers since we have no updated information.
See my previous post
When you were given the information about a couple of months, that was indeed the case with promises from manufacturers, however there are reasons the product are not produced yet. Again, had we taken your money, or promised an exact delivery date based on product either being in production or at powder coat, we would have been in contact.
This is the exact reason why we are not even giving projected dates anymore due. Sometimes events happen out of your control. I apologize if you were mislead on the product availability. I just wanted to put this out there for people that are on our lists.
acknowledged
You are welcome to call me if you can provide me with any input on this. All I can say if this was so easy for a shop like us (with all the complexities of a brick and mortar store, shop for installs and large item shipment, I would not have lost $15k with a supposedly reputable e-commerce company that was not able to deliver a site in 24 months.
Christo, I helped a global retailer with over 500 brick and mortars transition between e-commerce platforms (much more difficult than building from scratch). I would need a lot more than what you paid and a quoted timeline. That being said, I am not a good resource for you - you could get it done cheaper than the $x.xx m I billed them in 8 months.
Questions I would ask:
Were your expectations realistic?
Did you run references on your implementation partner?
What software did they attempt to implement?
Were your supply chain channels fixed so that the platform could work?
Do you keep an accurate count of inventory for the database?
What database do you use? Did they offer a migration to something that "played well" with their platform?
and on and on and on and on.....
I am sorry to hear this. Has this poor customer service been an issue as well with any order or product delivered by us?
No! Other product I ordered from you were rather simple in comparison, though. When I'm looking at spending $10k+ in armor, I'm going to want to feel comfortable about it. What if a component suffered damage to the point of requiring replacement? Could I count on you to have inventory to rectify? What if a critical component was missing when I received the order?
That would hardly work when someone takes the time to drive to our shop and expect to be able to speak to a knowledgeable person regarding the truck they want to outfit.
Really? Did Akio Toyoda walk you through which options to select for one of your many cruisers? It's called delegation and it's critical to an organization's success. It's possible (common, even) to be knowledgeable without being technical.
Not exactly sure what this means? I have to hire people that are not technical to advise people on how to build their trucks?
In my world (software) they're called many things...Project Managers, Product Managers, Implementation Analysts, etc. The idea is the same. Yes, less technical individuals who know your product and the market/industry can absolutely act as advisors - it's common practice. Delegate so that more technical individuals can ease pain points or work on next phase of product.
On this one I would beg to differ. Ensuring the customer receives his product in good order is arguably more important than any pre-sales communications we have since that customer has already spent money and is entitled that we take the time to ensure proper service to them by having product delivered undamaged.
We can clutter this thread with a whole discussion about Slee's business practices. I would gladly communicate via email or PM on this, but I don't think this is the place.
What Jackson was trying to convey that we are working on the sliders, as fast as we can. This is one of the products we are working on for a subset (LX) of a subset (200) of a market. We are investing all the money up front with no ask from any customer. We are sorry it is late and he tried to convey that here. However in all this, we do not believe we have hurt anyone financially or otherwise.
We do take all comment re: customer service to hart and try to improve and create a better company every day. However we are still a small company with limited resources.
Ensuring a customer receives his product in good order is expected in today's marketplace and it's beneficial to the organization for retention and quality control amongst other things.
I would agree that I have not experienced any negative financial repercussion but I can not speak for the masses and neither can you. Our opinion does not matter, it's the opinion of your marketplace. How do you evaluate Opportunity Cost? Trips could have been missed out on, or...worse, someone ran with your blanket expectation on delivery and scheduled a trip anyway and, after months of preparation, decided to go regardless. Maybe they suffered damage to their rocker panel? Things you have to consider...
Therein lies the rub. There is always two sides to the story. However we do accept all comments, good or bad and use those to guide us in our day to day operations.
Yep, that's why I communicated it (and again with this message).