If it was presented as one man's opinion, that wouldn't be a problem. Instead, John's 'opinion' is presented as incontrovertible fact, and anyone listening to him would believe that the 100 series is the only truck to buy, if you buy anything else you and your family's lives are in immediate danger, nothing ever breaks or needs maintenance on a 100, and baby Jesus will start crying if you even contemplate buying a lesser vehicle. What's worse, though, is that he WILL NOT shut up about it until everyone involved in the conversation gives up on it. Extolling the virtues of the 100 is great, pointing out the advantages (we all know there're no disadvantages) can be helpful to someone interested in buying a Landcruiser, but there's no need to beat the horse to a pulp. (I almost laughed myself to tears when at one point in this thread he offered me 'the last word'. As if.)
Apparently it's not permitted to have an opinion that is contrary to Shotts', and God forbid I actually ever decide to seriously argue with him. I refrain because I don't believe it's polite to do so on a forum, but IMHO that restraint should apply to both sides.
I like John as a wheeler, and enjoy talking to him in person. I dislike John the rabid 100 defender, and pretend that they are different people.
So BMan, tell me what to do. When John starts ragging on anything that's not a 100, should I just ignore him and keep quiet? Is that fair to the original poster?
For Chrissakes, he quoted your admonishment and used it to get in one more comment about how wonderful the 100 is. He tossed in a

, and then you complimented him on his 'fortitude'.

Gag me with a torsion bar.
-Spike