HiPo 2f Dyno run in the works... (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Mace
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
- Thread starter
- #62
And the results..
142 HP and 221ft/lbs of torque at the rear wheels
By the time you figure in the power lost to the SM420/dual tcases/14 bolt I am easily at 220 if not more like 240 hp at the flywheel
And as for weight, 4260lbs..
MUCH lighter than I thought
I'll scan the sheets tomorrow
142 HP and 221ft/lbs of torque at the rear wheels
By the time you figure in the power lost to the SM420/dual tcases/14 bolt I am easily at 220 if not more like 240 hp at the flywheel
And as for weight, 4260lbs..
MUCH lighter than I thought
I'll scan the sheets tomorrow
orangefj45
Supporting Vendor
damn, off by 4hp and 130 lbs. 
Off by 2hp and 690lbs!!
man I was way off!.
pull that sucker out & lets get some flywheel #'s
I love webwheeling!!
what RPM's?
pull that sucker out & lets get some flywheel #'s
I love webwheeling!!
what RPM's?
Eskimo
SILVER Star
Were you serious about a propane bottle? I need a third soooo bad! (or at least a usable fuel level gauge assembly...
You rock, Mace...
BTW, congrats.. those #'s are good!!
You rock, Mace...
BTW, congrats.. those #'s are good!!
- Thread starter
- #69
lolEskimo said:
I did not mean a forklift bottle, I meant one of the little green ones
Although I might find something more usefull
I stopped at a bit over 4200. It was not making any more power.
BTW, with the 4.11's and 32 ish" tires 40 grand is 90mph
Eskimo
SILVER Star
LOL..I thought you were being waaaaay too generous.. but who was I to argue?
- Thread starter
- #71
I am actually wondering if the propane carb is limiting me..
IT seems like it hit 240hp (at the flywheel) and then no more power was created (although it looked like I was increasing boost.) that does not make sense..
Hmm..
IT seems like it hit 240hp (at the flywheel) and then no more power was created (although it looked like I was increasing boost.) that does not make sense..
Hmm..
Eskimo
SILVER Star
Could very well be your cam flattening out also... If you're running a 425 mixer, the mixer isn't holding you back...
You could also just be getting outside the efficiency range of the turbo, and just pushing hot air into the engine... especially without an intercoooler.
You could also just be getting outside the efficiency range of the turbo, and just pushing hot air into the engine... especially without an intercoooler.
- Thread starter
- #73
More likely it is the cam.
the turbo is a T04. I am probably under the proper operating range of that turbo.. It is big..
Intercoolers are a waste of time on these motors..
the turbo is a T04. I am probably under the proper operating range of that turbo.. It is big..
Intercoolers are a waste of time on these motors..
get one of those downery HP cam's mine made about stock bottom end (with work) but above 3k & up it screamed!
I think I paid $160 about 5 years ago.
I think I paid $160 about 5 years ago.
Mark W
Yep, I really don't really care that much I guess.
What are the specs of the cam that you are running?
Mark...
Mark...
- Thread starter
- #76
Bone stock
That is one of the things I like so much about this mod..
As it stands I have a bone stock 82 FJ60 motor with unknown miles on it pushing almost as much HP at the rear wheels (through a SM420/dual mini tcases/14 bolt) as it was rated for at the crank when it rolled off the showroom floor..
Imagine what it could be with a motor that was built for a turbo..
That is one of the things I like so much about this mod..
As it stands I have a bone stock 82 FJ60 motor with unknown miles on it pushing almost as much HP at the rear wheels (through a SM420/dual mini tcases/14 bolt) as it was rated for at the crank when it rolled off the showroom floor..
Imagine what it could be with a motor that was built for a turbo..
