GX460 & GXOR B.S. thread (16 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Likewise, I almost went with ExpOne front and rear bumpers. Couldn’t get over the weights though. So I ended up with Victory 4x4 front and rear. I’m running a skinny 255/80/17 so it doesn’t eat up as much room.
The functionality is vastly superior to the victory one imo for the rear. Weights are within 5lbs with a single swing anyways. Not getting a front for a while. Plus I'm keeping air ride longer term with an airbag man setup eventually. Don't see a reason to convert to springs for me.
 
Last edited:
Likewise, I almost went with ExpOne front and rear bumpers. Couldn’t get over the weights though. So I ended up with Victory 4x4 front and rear. I’m running a skinny 255/80/17 so it doesn’t eat up as much room.
Which 255/80/17s are you running and how do you like them?
 
The functionality is vastly superior to the victory one imo for the rear. Weights are within 5lbs with a single swing anyways. Plus I'm keeping air ride longer term with an airbag man setup eventually. Don't see a reason to convert to springs for me.
Oh yea the rear is much more functional and weight difference is negligible. I don’t run low offset wheels and the victory didn’t stick out as much. Also the tire carrier can be added at any time which is nice.

Now though, the front weight was insane. 160lbs no bull bar. I went with the aluminum victory no bull bar at 70lbs
IMG_7810.jpeg
IMG_7807.jpeg
 
Oh yea the rear is much more functional and weight difference is negligible. I don’t run low offset wheels and the victory didn’t stick out as much. Also the tire carrier can be added at any time which is nice.

Now though, the front weight was insane. 160lbs no bull bar. I went with the aluminum victory no bull bar at 70lbs View attachment 3458259View attachment 3458260
Yeah the front I haven't found a ton of options I really like. ExpOne is one I don't like. For me I'd likely be between the victory front, coastal or trailready4x4. But that's down the road. Need to re-do my whole suspension next year. 150k and the stock one is getting a bit tired.
 
Which 255/80/17s are you running and how do you like them?
Falken wildpeaks, so far so good. Little bit of road noise intrusion. I’m still at stock height and all I did was massage the rear part of the fender liner. The front part was cut out for the bumper.

Gas mileage hasn’t changed for me much, but do notice it’ll downshift a bit more often on the hwy.

As far as off-roading I can’t tell you yet. But I ran 255/85/17 on my bronco and it did perfectly fine on all the trails and abuse I gave it.

Yeah the front I haven't found a ton of options I really like. ExpOne is one I don't like. For me I'd likely be between the victory front, coastal or trailready4x4. But that's down the road. Need to re-do my whole suspension next year. 150k and the stock one is getting a bit tired.

Wish there were more options out there but totally understand why there’s so little. Cutting bumpers is never precise and the slight differences in alignments make it harder too.

I’m getting ready to lift mine with Apache AX2 2”
 
Wish there were more options out there but totally understand why there’s so little. Cutting bumpers is never precise and the slight differences in alignments make it harder too.

I’m getting ready to lift mine with Apache AX2 2”
Curious on a review of those. Was eyeing them, but really kinda leaning towards Koni 82 or raid's and not having to worry about replacing anything for another 100k. My control arms are all rusted as well, so it's not just a swap for me. Going to need to remove everything and repaint/coat it all while I'm there.
 
A couple of times I've run into the following scenario:

Getting over some kind of "step" obstacle while on a steep incline. 4low, center locked, tried using MTS mogul, loose rock, and rock modes (no CC yet). The front tires climb right over, but then it feels like the rear axle immediately hangs up and just starts spinning both rear tires while the fronts aren't doing much but the rpm goes above the threshold for MTS to work. I need to give a pretty significant bump to get the back tires up and over. Is it possible that leaving the center unlocked would let MTS shift more power to the front and keep everything moving? Or do I just need to stop being a pansy and put the hammer down?
 
A couple of times I've run into the following scenario:

Getting over some kind of "step" obstacle while on a steep incline. 4low, center locked, tried using MTS mogul, loose rock, and rock modes (no CC yet). The front tires climb right over, but then it feels like the rear axle immediately hangs up and just starts spinning both rear tires while the fronts aren't doing much but the rpm goes above the threshold for MTS to work. I need to give a pretty significant bump to get the back tires up and over. Is it possible that leaving the center unlocked would let MTS shift more power to the front and keep everything moving? Or do I just need to stop being a pansy and put the hammer down?
As far as I know you don't get proper full atrac until it's locked. It's way more capable locked and I wouldn't even play around in dirt with it unlocked after a few hairy experiences with others driving.
 
  • Like
Reactions: r2m
A couple of times I've run into the following scenario:

Getting over some kind of "step" obstacle while on a steep incline. 4low, center locked, tried using MTS mogul, loose rock, and rock modes (no CC yet). The front tires climb right over, but then it feels like the rear axle immediately hangs up and just starts spinning both rear tires while the fronts aren't doing much but the rpm goes above the threshold for MTS to work. I need to give a pretty significant bump to get the back tires up and over. Is it possible that leaving the center unlocked would let MTS shift more power to the front and keep everything moving? Or do I just need to stop being a pansy and put the hammer down?
The Torsen will always go to the lowest common denominator of power or traction, even if the MTS intervenes I don't think it'll be enough.
 
A couple of times I've run into the following scenario:

Getting over some kind of "step" obstacle while on a steep incline. 4low, center locked, tried using MTS mogul, loose rock, and rock modes (no CC yet). The front tires climb right over, but then it feels like the rear axle immediately hangs up and just starts spinning both rear tires while the fronts aren't doing much but the rpm goes above the threshold for MTS to work. I need to give a pretty significant bump to get the back tires up and over. Is it possible that leaving the center unlocked would let MTS shift more power to the front and keep everything moving? Or do I just need to stop being a pansy and put the hammer down?
Maybe the front is getting light when the rear tires hit the obstacle? When in doubt skinny peddle for the win. But this is why they make aftermarket cases to isolate axles. Front to climb rear to push.
 
Maybe the front is getting light when the rear tires hit the obstacle? When in doubt skinny peddle for the win. But this is why they make aftermarket cases to isolate axles. Front to climb rear to push.
I just hold light throttle and let ATRAC do it's thing.
 
Maybe the front is getting light when the rear tires hit the obstacle? When in doubt skinny peddle for the win.
Physics agrees with that statement. In the most recent case, my buddies in a 2nd gen Tacoma and an FJ were in front of me on a fairly big pair of steps. The Tacoma guy just sends it all the time because he's a lunatic, and the FJ was rear+center locked and crawled over with a little bump. The front tires of the GX had the least drama, but then I got hung up the longest on the rear axle. It does occur to me that the GX has an extra1500 pounds over those 2 which doesn't help. Maybe I just need more lightbars.
 
Physics agrees with that statement. In the most recent case, my buddies in a 2nd gen Tacoma and an FJ were in front of me on a fairly big pair of steps. The Tacoma guy just sends it all the time because he's a lunatic, and the FJ was rear+center locked and crawled over with a little bump. The front tires of the GX had the least drama, but then I got hung up the longest on the rear axle. It does occur to me that the GX has an extra1500 pounds over those 2 which doesn't help. Maybe I just need more lightbars.
Tires and tire pressure can make worlds of difference, but I am pretty surprised what atrac can do with 35 psi Revo 3s
 
Tires and tire pressure can make worlds of difference, but I am pretty surprised what atrac can do with 35 psi Revo 3s
This was with my Pirelli ATs aired down to ~20psi and they are usually pretty sticky on rocks. I wonder if I should stiffen my rear shocks a couple clicks offroad. Maybe I need to trade some buttery smoothness to keep the rear axle + tire carrier hanging off the end from sinking down onto the bumpstops or something.
 
Rear locker helps tremendously, one of the only things I miss from my old Tacoma. The amount of peddle needed without it is hard, I prefer slow wheeling.
 
Tires and tire pressure can make worlds of difference, but I am pretty surprised what atrac can do with 35 psi Revo 3s
If you're doing that kind of off roading, you should be around 12 - 15 psi. Trust me, you tires can do it without popping a bead.
Let me qualify that statement with: do not go that low of pressure if you have wide wheels, larger than 8.5" wide and skinny tires. Wide wheels and skinny tires will pop a bead with low pressure, hence one always should run the narrowest wheels possible.
 
Falken wildpeaks, so far so good. Little bit of road noise intrusion. I’m still at stock height and all I did was massage the rear part of the fender liner. The front part was cut out for the bumper.

Gas mileage hasn’t changed for me much, but do notice it’ll downshift a bit more often on the hwy.

As far as off-roading I can’t tell you yet. But I ran 255/85/17 on my bronco and it did perfectly fine on all the trails and abuse I gave it.



Wish there were more options out there but totally understand why there’s so little. Cutting bumpers is never precise and the slight differences in alignments make it harder too.

I’m getting ready to lift mine with Apache AX2 2”

Did you have to re-gear? I am running 265/65/18 and I am seeing my GX having to downshift more frequently than before, even with the slightly larger diameter. Doesn't help that I have added a bunch of weight with the roof rack, sliders, bumper, winch, etc
 
Did you have to re-gear? I am running 265/65/18 and I am seeing my GX having to downshift more frequently than before, even with the slightly larger diameter. Doesn't help that I have added a bunch of weight with the roof rack, sliders, bumper, winch, etc
It's definitely the weight over the tires. You likely increased your vehicle weight close to GVWR between all the additions. The additional tire size isn't helping. I'd recommend going with a slight level for the front and an engine tune for the intermediate time. You can get better trans scheduling and a little extra umph down low this way. I've looked into Yotawerx and they have a pretty nice package for most people. A lot more focus on DD and trans scheduling that helps driveability over power/tq. For tires that small I wouldn't bother re-gearing until you're fully up in the 33.5"+ territory. I have rack, sliders, 32" and adding a rear bumper and it still drives good on highway. Around town there's some lashing points, but overall pretty stock still. The rear bumper might do something, but I doubt it since I have air ride in the rear to help with the weight.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom