FJ60 Recalls?

[JLH911]

I found two recalls for my 87 FJ60 by googling it as such.

I was wondering about the two listed for my year.

There is one for the infamous fuel tank replacement and yet another for the rear lap belts.


Rear Lap Belt Recall: 1987 Toyota Land Cruiser Recalls & Problems at Automobile Magazine

Here's a LINK for both of them:

Auto Recalls: TOYOTA - LAND CRUISER - 1987 -- Nolo

Anyway, I was wondering how one can find out if any of these have been done? I'm thinking maybe giving Toyota a call to find out.

I don't think the rear lap belt issue was taken care of yet because I've noticed my rear lap belts suffer from this problem.

Is there an expiration period on these recalls? I wouldn't think so since they're safety related.

Thanks

 

[NocalFJ60]

You can call Toyota and they can tell you if the work has been done. You are right there is not a expiration on a safety recall.

 

[Bookseeb]

Just checked on my 86' today for the fuel tank. All you do is call the service dept. at your local Toyota dealer and they'll ask for the vin.#. From that on there computer they can tell when and where if it has been replaced on your vehicle.

 

[JLH911]

Just checked on my 86' today for the fuel tank. All you do is call the service dept. at your local Toyota dealer and they'll ask for the vin.#. From that on there computer they can tell when and where if it has been replaced on your vehicle.

You can call Toyota and they can tell you if the work has been done. You are right there is not a expiration on a safety recall.

Awesome...I'll do that as soon as I can.

Heck, free stuff!

 

[mtb_rider]

Yep, pretty easy. The parts guy at my local dealer was actually even to look it up for me one day when I went in to pick up a part. Just took him a minute. He was even able to tell me the date and at what dealership the work was done.

 

[OCHO4I]

Has anyone actually had their 87 FJ60’s gas tank replaced recently pursuant to the recall? I plan to look into whether mine’s was ever replaced when I return to the states next month and my mechanic, who also owns an 87’ FJ60, told me that when he took his 60 in to his local Toyota dealership in Chino about two years ago to get the tank replaced, they told him that although his tank was never replaced, the recall had expired. (Perhaps they were trying to avoid having to eat the labor cost on a 26 year old recall?)

 

[Tvaldriz]

My 1987 FJ60 tank replacement

Ocho:

The recall still is valid. I called my local Toyota Service department
(Toyota of Walnut Creek, CA). They asked for my vin# and they looked it up. It had been done by Heartland Toyota in Washington
State.

I believe the recall # for the 1987 is 32329.


They still do it if it has not been done prior. The issue was pressure
buildup, from what I gather.

Tom

 

[RredFJ40]

I had the tank replaced on my 82 last year. They HAVE to do it. If they raise a fuss ask for the name of their regional corporate representative, that ought to get their attention.

 

[jvazquez53]

That fuel tank is about the only brand new part on my 60. The dealer treated my so good that I have taken a few customers to them. They replaced the tank and the rear lap belts in one day. All I did was make the phone call.

 

[cr cruzr]

I Guess I May Join The Ranks

RredFJ40 said I should have gone to Toyota, in the first place, when I had my fuel tank issue. Maybe I should have done some more research (for any used vehicle, I guess we should always check for recalls).

Anyways, after seeing this discussion - one more time - and seeing the specific reasoning for the recall, I'm inclined to set up an appointment. I wouldn't really have given it much thought, but I have noticed a fuel smell.

Just this past Sunday, at my brother's place, as we unloaded a huge TV, we both smelled it. I thought I had smelled it before (but, had some doubts). Checked for leaks, but have seen none. Now, after seeing the recall is for a "leaking" tank (and not a "rusted" tank) I will see what they have to say.

But, here's the kicker; I initially went to Toyota, when I was trying to get this pig back on the road - and they never mentioned it. Yes, they even mentioned the rust in the fuel tank. But, they also mentioned it would cost me thousands for them to service everything.

So, after their "straight-shooting" talk and non-service, I'm kinda ticked. The mechanic had to have known about this. The service manager had to have known about this (both of whom I spoke with in great detail).

I wasn't looking to get something for free, but the tank I purchased was "used". Then again, I wonder why the guys (owner) at the large after-market shop (in the SFV) didn't tell me about the recall - when they sold it to me.

I would venture that nobody on this site would disagree that he wouldn't have known. He could have saved me $125. Instead, he sold me a used tank - that in all likelihood is defective.

You live and you learn (RedFR40 sounds like my dad). But it sucks when those with a lot more knowledge than you play "dumb".

We'll let you know how it turns out.


note; Anyone have an idea on the following;

Will Toyota return the tank? Likely no, right?

Do they replace the sending unit, as well? It seems logical, but...

 

[Dynosoar]

No, you don't get your parts back on a recall campaign, and no, the sender is not replaced. Yes they are supposed to change the vent hoses with the recall. Marv is the business to make $, he does not know if your rig has been recalled or not. Not to come down hard on you, but there is a TON of information available here, and if you had searched or even asked someone would have said something to you. Remember your truck may have been in for the recall already so maybe your $125+sender was a good investment.


Dynosoar

 

[RredFJ40]

In all fairness, i wouldn't expect the dealership service department to keep up on 2 recalls for a twenty year old vehicle. Half the techs in the dept. probably weren't even alive when 60's were still new.

If your dealership is anything like mine Toyota isn't the only marque they sell. At my local dealership the techs have their hands busy with Mopar stuff. I'm sure those recalls are quite enough to deal with

Dynosoar might be right on, you won't know if the tank had previously been replaced until you give toyota your VIN. Maybe it was already done.

PS - you'd have to be pretty young for me to be your dad

 

[CodeRed]

Thanks for the info

I just looked it up for my 89 and yep, there it is!

 

[cr cruzr]

Let's agree to disagree

Thanks for the positive information about any returned parts. As I stated originally, I should have done more research. However, had the only Tech in the Toyota-Only dealership mentioned it, I might have found out (where I took the vehicle for an inspection in the first place).

From what I can find out, this recall appears to list every (gas) LC from 1981 through 1990. In fact, it is the only significant recall for this rig. Yes, there is the seatbelt issue. And, yes, there was another recall for the front suspension. But the single-biggest issue was the fuel tank. In a nutshell, it's the only recall for the life of this LC.

Something that I would expect a Technician to know - when they are discussing fuel tank problems with the owner. By the way, this Tech was no kid - he was the oldest (and only) Tech that was able to work on this truck.

And while being in the business to make money is the American way, I - again - question why someone with such a vast knowledge of this vehicle never mentioned the recall.

It won't be the first time someone has claimed I was foolish. But it won't be the last time someone sits in heir armchair and opines.

I stand by my original assessment. It would help anyone, that those in the know, to let others in on something can affect their pocketbook - not to mention their life.

 

[GAS-A-LOT!]

WOW!!!! I would have never known...... my 60 is an 85.... recal applies? I'm going to call my local yota dealer.... It's funny though. Toyota central is locally known to be sharks. You could be unemployed and losing your home and they will still push you to buy a car.... NICE aint it?

 

[mtb_rider]

Thanks for the positive information about any returned parts. As I stated originally, I should have done more research. However, had the only Tech in the Toyota-Only dealership mentioned it, I might have found out (where I took the vehicle for an inspection in the first place).

From what I can find out, this recall appears to list every (gas) LC from 1981 through 1990. In fact, it is the only significant recall for this rig. Yes, there is the seatbelt issue. And, yes, there was another recall for the front suspension. But the single-biggest issue was the fuel tank. In a nutshell, it's the only recall for the life of this LC.

Something that I would expect a Technician to know - when they are discussing fuel tank problems with the owner. By the way, this Tech was no kid - he was the oldest (and only) Tech that was able to work on this truck.

And while being in the business to make money is the American way, I - again - question why someone with such a vast knowledge of this vehicle never mentioned the recall.

It won't be the first time someone has claimed I was foolish. But it won't be the last time someone sits in heir armchair and opines.

I stand by my original assessment. It would help anyone, that those in the know, to let others in on something can affect their pocketbook - not to mention their life.

I totally understand your frustration. However, as RredFJ40 said, it is a twenty-something year old recall, and it's not like these guys are working on old LC's on anything resembling a regular basis. And without knowing the tech's history, it's unfair to jump to conclusions that he intentionally ripped you off. We have no idea how long he has been a Toyota tech, or what his background is. A lot of techs bounce around from brand to brand, and maybe even the all-around, independent shops in-between, many times throughout their careers.

 

[fjdemon]

Do a search on here, this has been covered a million times. Lots of useful info. in past threads

 

[MT-PTK]

In all fairness, i wouldn't expect the dealership service department to keep up on 2 recalls for a twenty year old vehicle. Half the techs in the dept. probably weren't even alive when 60's were still new.

If your dealership is anything like mine Toyota isn't the only marque they sell. At my local dealership the techs have their hands busy with Mopar stuff. I'm sure those recalls are quite enough to deal with

Dynosoar might be right on, you won't know if the tank had previously been replaced until you give toyota your VIN. Maybe it was already done.

PS - you'd have to be pretty young for me to be your dad

Yup.

I saw this thread on Friday and decided to call the local Toyota dealer. When I got a tech in the service dept and asked about the two recalls, he had no idea what I was talking about and started to dispute the fact that a 20+ something recall would still be in effect. I assured him it was and he passed me on to the manager who hadn't heard of it either. After spending a few minutes researching it he confirmed that it was valid and then asked me for my vin#. He was able to tell me when and where the work was done to correct the tank & belt issue. He apologized and then chuckled that none of the techs in the place were around that long ago. Heck, here in the NE they see old FJ's about as often as they see flying pigs...which is about never.


MT

 

[JeffJ60]

Called my shop on Friday too... We'll call the service manager "Bob" since that's his name. Good dude and knowlegable on 60's. He called a few folks then called me back and ordered the parts same day. As soon as they arrive the work will be done.
His only beef was that if they need additional parts (clips, etc...) to perform the recall work, that cost is mine to bare. I would think they would have had to honor all parts to perform the recall completely.

Thoughts?

 

[Tvaldriz]

Seems to me that the parts needed to do the recall will be covered by Toyota. The dealer can talk to Toyota ahead of time to see if
there are any non-covered parts and advise you before you go forward. Get a written estimate of "non-covered parts and labor"
if it becomes an issue.

Tom