Not sure I agree with jag666’s math, last time I checked the sbc 350 put out more torque at an even lower rpm than the stock 6 cylinder???
Jim;
I picked-up your gauntlet and dug into the various specs of the three engines in question.. A Toyota FJ40, A Chevy "Small Block" and, of course, the Cadillac 429cid V-8.
As I have a 1973 Toyota "F Engine" service manual, I used the specs from that book, to wit:
Toyota FJ40. Circa up to 1973.
Max HP: (SAE Gross): 155HP at 4000rpm
Max Torque: (SAE Gross): 230 Ft Lbs at 2200rpm
Comp Ratio: 7.8:1
CID: 236.7 Cu In.
From "a' Toyota on-line site:
FJ40, 3.9L Inline Six (F and F2 spec)
1960-1974 HP: 125hp @3600RPM.
1975-1983 HP: 135hp @3600RPM.
1960-1974 Torque: 209 Ft Lbs @2000RPM.
1975-1983 Torque: 210 Ft Lbs @1800RPM.
Chevy V-8: (limited to the 327cid and 350cid "street car" engine as likely to be most easily obtained from salvage yards) circa 1962-2003
Power Output: 110-475hp.
Torque Output: 215-400Lb Ft. (Note: Includes the 400cid V-8 and DOHC 4 Valve V-8's).
NO RPM Rating Listed for ANY SBC, BUT specs DID note: "Redline: 6500rpm"!!
Also, Street Car Engines ran at lower HP/RPM and CR Levels. I say this as most Chevy V-8's used in "engine swaps" have a high probability of being "wrecking yard picks", thus: worn-out street cars! (albeit rebuilt!)
Cadillac 429cid V-8:
Stock Power Output: 340HP @480 Ft Lbs Torque at 4400RPM with 11.5:1 CR.
So, in part you are correct.. Chevy DOES put-out more torque at "up to" 400FT Lbs. BUT, the ONLY RPM Level
I could find was listed as: "A 6500RPM RedLine".. Don't know what you think, but, to me, that's twisting the hell out of an engine. (tho I built and campaigned an AMA Pro GP RoadRacer with a powerband of 3000 to 9000rpm and ran against Yamaha's with a powerband of 12000 to 12500rpm.. They could NOT keep-up with me!)
As to your comment of: "...the sbc 350 put out more torque at an even lower rpm than the stock 6 cylinder", the (above) fact shows the Toyota Six Cylinder puts out 230lbs of max torque at a rather low 2200RPM while the "SBC" puts out it's MAX Torque of 400Ft Lbs (twice as much), but HAS to spin at 6500 RPM (THREE TIMES higher than the stock FJ-40!! AND nearly twice that of the Caddy V-8) to do this.. The Facts do NOT jive with your statement!!
Which goes back to my original comment that the SBC Engine IS "an RPM Engine".. and, in my opinion, not really suited to be fitted into a ground-grabbing, rock-crawlin', hill climbing, "Get-Down Grunt" Four Wheel Drive Vehicle!
Charles 1974 FJ40.